Samuel Eto'o

[Jusek 2,031]

Tancredi Palmeri ‏@tancredipalmeri15m

Each of Chelsea, Manchester United and Tottenham will meet tomorrow in London Eto'o agent, according to Sky Italy

Tancredi Palmeri and Sky Italy...

[Mouri_Matic 560]

Come on guys, he is NOT GOING to be throwing away £20m for nothing hahahahahahahahhhahahahaha

[Special Juan 28,124]

Tancredi Palmeri and Sky Italy...

Can't think of anything worse.

[cfcs most wanted 657]

look at his age, we need a striker which would last longer

[drog.ba 239]

look at his age, we need a striker which would last longer

not that old

we have Lukaku for the future, we need someone now, ideally we sign a younger player but there aren't many options

[ZanSnake 1,211]

What happen to that guy that was mentioned awhie ago Fernando Loorete torres or something?

Could he be an option?

[yuvala 2,167]

Seems like it might acually happen..

[Pizy 18,866]

If it comes to Eto'o or stick with who we've got I think we should pass on Eto'o.

I just can't see why we're after ONLY a striker though. Wish we were as dead set on getting a CM as we appear to be a striker. If we bought someone like Witsel or De Rossi and no striker before the deadline I'd be elated.

[Hutcho 8,443]

Eto would be a temporary option. One that we see us through until lukaku is fully ready. We don't need a long term option.

[Heisenberg 1,824]

Eto would be a temporary option. One that we see us through until lukaku is fully ready. We don't need a long term option.

Eto'o is too much temporary, his football is still acceptable but we'll still need a striker in the next season.It may fix our problem this year in attack, but we'll still need to spend when Eto'o finish his contract, Lukaku needs a big striker to compete with him for first place, we cant only rely on Lukaku for the next five or six years that is why Rooney is a better option than Eto'o.

[ChelseaFanUK 1,014]

Eto'o if he joins at say £5m, is good business. Providing his wages are dropped significantly. I'd bet good money he will be near the top of the scoring charts come May

[ANDRECHO 432]

he has 2 or 3 years to play a great level . Eto'o is world class ... rooney or Eto'o , any striker who really shot , shot , shot ....

[Hutcho 8,443]

Ignore this.

[Hutcho 8,443]

Eto'o is too much temporary, his football is still acceptable but we'll still need a striker in the next season.It may fix our problem this year in attack, but we'll still need to spend when Eto'o finish his contract, Lukaku needs a big striker to compete with him for first place, we cant only rely on Lukaku for the next five or six years that is why Rooney is a better option than Eto'o.

Ofc Rooney is better.

5 or 6 years seems extreme. You don't have to be 26 to be relied on. Of course he may not peak until then, but he can be a big time player for us before then. He may even have to be this year.

The problem with Eto is the crazy wages.

[Heisenberg 1,824]

Ofc Rooney is better.

5 or 6 years seems extreme. You don't have to be 26 to be relied on. Of course he may not peak until then, but he can be a big time player for us before then. He may even have to be this year.

The problem with Eto is the crazy wages.

Lukaku is definitely staying here for a long long time.He is a Chelsea supporter before being a player and he'll have plenty of chances to prove he's our main man, a la Rooney back in 2004 when he was playing with Ruud VN and Louis Saha, and through times he had to play with Ronaldo and Tevez & Berbatov and now Chicharito and Van Persie, we have to do the same with Lukaku.Always giving him a big name to compete with that's why I chose Rooney rather than Eto'o to compete with Lukaku, the Englishmen flexibility will help the Belgian a lot and still gives him competition to lead the attack.About Eto'o crazy wages, the board wont do crazy deals I feel.