Santiago. 1,500 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Except that it's worse for Sanchez. Schurrle is actually a starter at Bayer, Sanchez has started only 14 games at Barça this season. He has been absolutely dreadful usually falling out of the team as quickly as he gets into it. I've never seen a player blow hot and cold so rapidly. Though he always put 100% into every match, just a lot of the time his all isn't worth that much.Considering the fact he has changed his game dramatically since his move. No longer taking players on and his skilled dribbling ability, he's slowly adapting to their system which completely neglects his strengths.And to think Barca want Neymar. I know they have a tremendous record of Brazilians performing successfully, I just can't see it with Neymar. Doesn't fit them at all and I can't see him change his game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styles 9,790 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 I can't trust figures reported by the British media at all. They don't even bother to convert € to £ and lift reports from other places and just report the same figure. £20M = €23M €17M = £20MThere's clearly a difference so I don't understand why they continue to do this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 I can't trust figures reported by the British media at all. They don't even bother to convert € to £ and lift reports from other places and just report the same figure. £20M = €23M €17M = £20MThere's clearly a difference so I don't understand why they continue to do this.That's because they want to make us look like we're spending big bucks on players. The higher the price, regardless of currency, the better it is for them to say we're buying sucess and all that. Part of their agenda against us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styles 9,790 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 That's because they want to make us look like we're spending big bucks on players. The higher the price, regardless of currency, the better it is for them to say we're buying sucess and all that. Part of their agenda against us.True. I've already seen this Schurrle transfer reported as a 50m deal (adding wages). They really hate us don't they? It makes you wonder about other figures like £32m Hazard and £25m Oscar. Even Lukaku at £18m Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beepu 1,714 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 im pretty sure oscar was 25m eurosSchurrle wouldnt fill a need, but he offers something a bit different than what we have now. Im just glad KDB wont probably be involved Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 True. I've already seen this Schurrle transfer reported as a 50m deal (adding wages). They really hate us don't they? It makes you wonder about other figures like £32m Hazard and £25m Oscar. Even Lukaku at £18mI'm pretty sure Oscar was 25m euros.http://www.weaintgotnohistory.com/2012/7/25/3186785/oscar-may-not-have-cost-as-much-as-the-english-media-would-lead-you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styles 9,790 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 I'm pretty sure Oscar was 25m euros.http://www.weaintgotnohistory.com/2012/7/25/3186785/oscar-may-not-have-cost-as-much-as-the-english-media-would-lead-youThanks. The English press are the absolute worse football journos in the world. Maybe Torres wasn't 50m after all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 That's 22m euros firstly and there's also the fact Schurrle is very happy to do a job on the wing, contributes defensively and has immense work-rate as well as contributing offensively. He's also far more talented than Sturridge (just my opinion mind). Had Sturridge shown all of these qualities then maybe he wouldn't have been sold. So yes, nice job CFCSchürrle is more mature, intelligent than Sturridge, but Sturridge is far more talented and unpredictable. Still I'd rather have Sanchez, cos he is a little quicker, out and out winger, more experienced and skilled. Though it is not much a difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 im pretty sure schuurle is faster than sanchez but they are both fast. and im sorry but he pisses on sturridge. there is no way sturridge would of got 22 caps for germany if he was german Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluelsthecolour 61 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 im pretty sure schuurle is faster than sanchez but they are both fast. and im sorry but he pisses on sturridge. there is no way sturridge would of got 22 caps for germany if he was germanSchurrle isnt even that fast, no way near the pace of Sanchez.A little skeptical to this buy, would rather see a speedy winger that can beat his man with pure pace, like Moses but better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themightyblue 443 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Schürrle is more mature, intelligent than Sturridge, but Sturridge is far more talented and unpredictable. Still I'd rather have Sanchez, cos he is a little quicker, out and out winger, more experienced and skilled. Though it is not much a difference. Like I said, just my opinion that Schurrle is more talented.Daniel B. @dan_bu57mLeverkusen sporting director Rudi Völler is in London right now to negotiate the Schürrle to Chelsea transfer. Decision close. #CFC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backstreet09 499 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Like I said, just my opinion that Schurrle is more talented.Daniel B. @dan_bu57mLeverkusen sporting director Rudi Völler is in London right now to negotiate the Schürrle to Chelsea transfer. Decision close. #CFCAwesome mayne, that's just awesome XD. Oh and Sturridge is shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANDRECHO 432 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMxmmPkbmWk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace. 4,352 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 It makes you wonder about other figures like £32m Hazard and £25m Oscar. Even Lukaku at £18mAs some members have already stated, Oscar has been bought for 25 millions euros, not 25 millions pounds. I read on some brazilians site that his price was slightly over 60 millions reals. $R65m = €25m. So that makes sense (and £25m = $R77m...).On the other hand, Hazard price tag is truly £32m. He cost €40m. Though, his wage is “only” £110k a week, while they say £150+k. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bir_CFC 3,455 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 True. I've already seen this Schurrle transfer reported as a 50m deal (adding wages). They really hate us don't they? It makes you wonder about other figures like £32m Hazard and £25m Oscar. Even Lukaku at £18mAnd Lukaku as far as I recal was 10M + bonuses (which could increase it to 18). But if he turns out good enough to earn those bonuses then he's good enough to warrant that fee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 As some members have already stated, Oscar has been bought for 25 millions euros, not 25 millions pounds. I read on some brazilians site that his price was slightly over 60 millions reals. $R65m = €25m. So that makes sense (and £25m = $R77m...).On the other hand, Hazard price tag is truly £32m. He cost €40m. Though, his wage is “only” £110k a week, while they say £150+k.Yup. English media has brainwashed most people to believe that Hazard is on 175k p/w wages here when he's clearly not as the Belgian/French media has said he's only on 110k p/w wages(or somewhere around there). In fact, I even remember the English media going in detail and calculating the price of Hazard's entire contract which was just ridiculously mental! Anyway, between the English and French/Belgian media, I know who I would rather believe more in this situation given the latter knows much more about Hazard and especially the English media has an agenda against us and they don't usually have a clue what's going on with our transfers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANDRECHO 432 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGjUJsGyQ7Y Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amblève. 4,995 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 For 20 million, I'd take Sanchez over Schurrle.Schurrle's development has stalled at Leverkusen, he generally has 1-2 good games...then goes missing for a few games and then has another 1-2 good games.Exactly. He was an outstanding player for Mainz on their level (above average but not exactly very good) but ever since moving to Leverkusen he has remained that player. He hasn't had a real progress that would get you excited nor has he ever shown that he has the potential to become a guy who can put in world-class perfomances on a regular basis which is what I personally expect from a guy we pay 20m euros for. Right now he even struggles with playing well for more than 3 games. I'd much rather see us going for a proven player instead of Schürrle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGuerreiro 252 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Exactly. He was an outstanding player for Mainz on their level (above average but not exactly very good) but ever since moving to Leverkusen he has remained that player. He hasn't had a real progress that would get you excited nor has he ever shown that he has the potential to become a guy who can put in world-class perfomances on a regular basis which is what I personally expect from a guy we pay 20m euros for. Right now he even struggles with playing well for more than 3 games. I'd much rather see us going for a proven player instead of Schürrle.€20M is £17M. To expect a player coming for £17M to put in world class performances on a regular basis is way too optimistic. World class players (or players with the potential to become world class) cost a lot more then £17M in the current economy. Think you're in the wrong decade mate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amblève. 4,995 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 €20M is £17M. To expect a player coming for £17M to put in world class performances on a regular basis is way too optimistic. World class players (or players with the potential to become world class) cost a lot more then £17M in the current economy. Think you're in the wrong decade mate.If you wanna bold a part of my post then bold the whole statement.Exactly. He was an outstanding player for Mainz on their level (above average but not exactly very good) but ever since moving to Leverkusen he has remained that player. He hasn't had a real progress that would get you excited nor has he ever shown that he has the potential to become a guy who can put in world-class perfomances on a regular basis which is what I personally expect from a guy we pay 20m euros for. Right now he even struggles with playing well for more than 3 games. I'd much rather see us going for a proven player instead of Schürrle.You're welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.