Suarez bites Ivanovic

[The Mak 4,459]

Does anyone know if his 2 game ban for his 10th yellow card is inclusive in the 10, or will it be 12 in total? Because that would be hilarious.
It'd be even better if he appealed, only to get a lengthier ban!

[dumps 284]

Back of the net!

BEST. USER. EVER.

I look forward to EVERY post you make.

EDIT: this has really made me want to create a David Brent account and just stroll around these forums responding as he would if he were a CFC fan.

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

Does anyone know if his 2 game ban for his 10th yellow card is inclusive in the 10, or will it be 12 in total? Because that would be hilarious.

It'd be even better if he appealed, only to get a lengthier ban!

Just about to post this, I wish it will be 12..... LMFAO

[SinineUltra 1,170]

Looking at this from a neutral view and pretending he bit someone else not associated with Chelsea, all I've been thinking is the following:-

He was found guilty (if I remember correctly) for racial abuse towards Evra. The F.A. are clear that they have NO TOLERANCE towards racism.

He's now clearly been found guilty due to undeniable video proof from several angles that he's committed assault on a fellow professional. The F.A. are clear that they have NO TOLERANCE towards abuse & assault.

So my question is; If the F.A. have 'No Tolerance' like they claim, why is he just getting a slap on the wrist and a 12-game ban? I assume Liverpool will still pay him his wages throughout that time unless they specifically try and make an example out of him to try and prevent their club's image from falling any further, meaning he'll basically be getting an extended holiday!!

After 2 high-profile incidents in this league already and the Premier League clearly slowing down in terms of quality and being quickly caught up by the Bundesliga, surely, as harsh as this may sound, Liverpool should be forced to either sell Suarez to another league or release him from his contract? He is single handedly bringing down the league with; 1: Racism. 2: Assault. 3: His well documented diving. (Oh, and a few deliberate hand-balls along the way.)

That would be 'No Tolerance' and prevent other players from doing as he does as it would cut-short their time in the most watched league in world football.

As we all know, I guess the F.A. are just a joke, aren't they?

That's a bit too harsh in my opinion ( I don't mean the 10 match ban but forced to sell/release). It's not like he committed an act of cannibalism, this whole story is blown out of proportion. When it comes to your suggested punishment: I dread the day when the FA has a word in saying which players should the club sell or release. Not going to happen, he will miss the rest of the season plus next season's 6 opening games - a worthy punishment. As long as Suarez keeps single handedly dragging Liverpool through game after game, I can't see them giving a single fuck about it, unless a bigger club comes flashing money. Having him is a risk but with a strict, authoritarian manager, he is worth the gamble.

Like people above are mentioning - maybe even a 12 match ban plus if they appeal it can go 3 ways - reduce, leave it as it is or increase the length of the ban.

[manpe 10,861]

Tbf not all RAWK users are delusional. I caught this surprisingly sensible post:

I love Suarez. The lads a cracking good player, but at the end of the day, he acted the c*nt here. He let himself, his team mates and the club down big time. I mean, there really is no way defend him here. He took an opponents arm and bit it. The intent is as clear as day. You could probably defend a bad tackle on the grounds that he was going for the ball, or defend an elbow to the face on the grounds that he was jumping to head the ball, but there is absolutely zero ground for excuse here. None whatsoever. What he did was terrible. And when you consider that this isn't the first time that he has done this to an opponent then his defense just diminishes even further

Now I'm all for supporting our players through thick and thin. I supported him 100% during the whole Evra saga. But this is different. He really fucked up this time and there's no way to defend it. We can accuse the FA of corruption all we like. We can debate the 10 game ban and weather or not its severity is warranted until the cows come home. To me they are just asides. The real issue here is that one of our players acted in an inexcusable manner. I wouldn't even bother appealing the ban. In fact, I think it might be more prudent if the staff and management of the club focused on ensuring Suarez never does anything like this again. Like I said, I love Suarez the footballer. But he fucked up here. And he should be made realize it if you ask me, before he goes letting the club down again any time in the future

EDIT: One more

The whole purpose of banning a player is so it acts as a deterrent from him doing something stupid again. He got a ban for being a racist, and still played up in matches, including punching a player in an international match.

Then he goes and bites a player in a premier league match, an offence that he has previously committed. He got a lengthy ban for that, and it didn't deter him from doing it again.

Therefore, it makes sense to give him an even longer ban this time, let's just hope that it finally gets through to Luis and he can fulfil his amazing talent....

[Strike 7,474]

Just about to post this, I wish it will be 12..... LMFAO

i hope Liverpool appeal and make it 14

[TacticalBlues 2,817]

I hope the suspension clashes with a Chelsea game. It would be somewhat redunant for us as a club if he serves his suspension and comes back to play us (If he stays at all that is).

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

i hope Liverpool appeal and make it 14

That would be HILARIOUS!!!

TBH I think it should be 12. 10 matches ban is for this creepy biting incident, he should take responsibility of those 10 yellow cards which is 2 matches ban as well, it's not fair to other teams FA count them altogether.

[Amblève. 4,995]

Does anyone know if his 2 game ban for his 10th yellow card is inclusive in the 10, or will it be 12 in total? Because that would be hilarious.

It'd be even better if he appealed, only to get a lengthier ban!

Should definitely be 12 games. Those are 2 different bans so thinking about it logically the FA has to ban him for 2 more games. But yeah, logically...

[The Skipper 20,609]

HOW DELUDED ARE THESE BUNCH?

[Strike 7,474]

Should definitely be 12 games. Those are 2 different bans so thinking about it logically the FA has to ban him for 2 more games. But yeah, logically...

there is a date in april beyond which yellow-card bans are not counted. must be past it

[BlueLion. 21,491]

He won't get a ban for a 10th yellow. We've gone well past the amnesty date.

[Fulham Broadway 17,299]

Banned 18 times in total since joining The Victims.

Dignity and Respect as always at Shitfield

[Sheva. 5,373]

How can they even complain about this? when a player does something this stupid, he deserves whatever he gets.

[Amblève. 4,995]

there is a date in april beyond which yellow-card bans are not counted. must be past it

Forgot that. Thanks mate.