Eden Hazard

[edenhazard17 281]

[TrippingStep 336]

It seems it's hard in this topic to have a middle ground.

Either excessive praise or excessive criticism.

I don't undersdand how you can say he was poor for the majority of the season while he was very good the last 3-4 months with Benitez and was one of our best players in nearly every match during this period.

It's like the topic on Oscar where there are such extreme opinions.

It seems like the "non engish typical player" like Oscar Luiz Hazard attracts extreme diverse reactions.

I tink the problem we have in the chelsea squad it's that we half the players suited to a certain game style while the other is bad at this game style.

[edenhazard17 281]

Anyone know Hazard have some kind of tatoo in Japanese Katakana? Wonder what it means

[Pacquiao 1,834]

cant wait for the season to start! Hazard is ready to tear teams apart!

[pHaRaOn 2,131]

Anyone know Hazard have some kind of tatoo in Japanese Katakana? Wonder what it means

His son's name

[edenhazard17 281]

His son's name

Oh, I see..

[BlueLion. 21,491]

His son's name

I'm actually pretty sure it says "thank fuck I didn't sign for Arsenal".

[ZOS 580]

His son's name

his son have a paragraph long name? I thought each of these signs represent a word or two...

[Xtraxion 100]

Eden vs Roma.

[Mufassir08 2,400]

I am sorry but no way lucas is a better dribbler then hazard blue tinted glasses or not.Infact if anything it is lucas who relies a lot more on his pace for dribbling then hazard who uses pure skill more often then not.

[The Skipper 20,593]

I think Hazard is just as good as Iniesta when it comes to dribbling. Iniesta has a bit more finesse but Hazard makes up for that with greater balance, agility and pace.

[Mr_President 404]

I think Hazard is just as good as Iniesta when it comes to dribbling. Iniesta has a bit more finesse but Hazard makes up for that with greater balance, agility and pace.

And Hazard will only get better. He has all the natural talent, we can all see that, exciting times

[Chelsea? 892]

110% agree. Even Hazard's a better penalty taker. Mata's missed some while Hazard's taken most of his quite nicely.

This is irrelavant to the discussion

[Chelsea? 892]

Listen buddy, why don't you learn how to fully comprehend a post before you start deciding whether people are biased towards a player.

I said there's no reason to complain about his finishing, as he usually makes the most of the chances he gets in front of goal. Whereas Mata has so many goalscoring chances (created by himself or otherwise) he could take his goal stats up by several notches by finishing better (for example not hitting it straight at the keeper or generating more shot power)

You still sound like a Hazard Fanboy that probably think's: Hazard has the dribbling of Messi, Pace of Walcott, and finishing of Cavani. Hazard is a decent finisher but he's not better than Mata. your second post simply re stated what your first post said.

I'd rather Hazard focus on being more aggressive than worry about fixing his finishing.

[Chelsea? 892]

I am sorry but no way lucas is a better dribbler then hazard blue tinted glasses or not.Infact if anything it is lucas who relies a lot more on his pace for dribbling then hazard who uses pure skill more often then not.

we must have a different opinion of dribbling then, cause I most of the time Hazard beats his man, he gets underneath them and out runs them.

[hjperdeath 2,226]

This is irrelavant to the discussion

Irrelevant? from what I've heard penalties involve taking shots. Remember the miss against Birmingham? Munich? . it's 50% shot taking, and 25% decision making and 25% attitude.

[Coop 114]

Irrelevant? from what I've heard penalties involve taking shots. Remember the miss against Birmingham? Munich? . it's 50% shot taking, and 25% decision making and 25% attitude.

Not with Hazard, he does not look at the ball, he looks at the goalkeeper, when the goalkeeper makes a decision he has no time to look at the ball but knows where the ball is and knows where to hit the ball.

[hjperdeath 2,226]

Not with Hazard, he does not look at the ball, he looks at the goalkeeper, when the goalkeeper makes a decision he has no time to look at the ball but knows where the ball is and knows where to hit the ball.

Exactly. Though mostly it comes to down to character and on the spot thinking ability, there is a considerable amount of technique you need to make sure the ball reaches the back of the net. but now that's going off the topic. Mata is capable of scoring a lot more goals if he can improve on it.