Eden Hazard

[Unionjack 7,531]

Not a thing said about Eden today. Shock!

[Vesper 28,772]

15 minutes ago, Unionjack said:

Not a thing said about Eden today. Shock!

 

[Unionjack 7,531]

2 minutes ago, Vesper said:

 

Meant here in his thread Mrs

[Vesper 28,772]

2 minutes ago, Unionjack said:

Meant here in his thread Mrs

[robsblubot 3,502]

Went missing against Arsenal. No excuses: false nine, Sarri BS.

He saw a lot of the ball while playing false nine and then when back in a free role. Held to the ball too long, did not pass quickly enough and always looked for the dribble.

He is our most important player and we need him to step up in these games. This was not it.

 

 

[Kajo 176]

He is our best player and he shouldn't be playing as a false 9 it simply doesn't work. Seems like Italians got a thing for that.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

[Unionjack 7,531]

8 hours ago, Robchels said:

Went missing against Arsenal. No excuses: false nine, Sarri BS.

He saw a lot of the ball while playing false nine and then when back in a free role. Held to the ball too long, did not pass quickly enough and always looked for the dribble.

He is our most important player and we need him to step up in these games. This was not it.

 

 

Look even if he detested the position and he stamped his tiny feet and held his breath till he turned blue and sqweamed and sqweamed every curse word under the sun he should still do the nest job that he could and I dont see that he's tried.

Its as clear as the grimaces on our faces hes off and we should have had all this sorted a year ago. But we have to NOW seriously get into the market for a replacement.

Do we go for a LW or a RW and put Pully over o LW?

Whether one way or the other we got options like  Coutinho,Chiesa,Isco,Werner (striker yeah but also LW) , Suso,Malcom,Lozano,Thauvin,Bailey, Coman,Hazard.Bertrand Traore, and probably another 20 that Mz @Vesper will add on.But we do need to do it now,

Whats your options guys?

[Superblue 6,370]

19 minutes ago, Unionjack said:

Look even if he detested the position and he stamped his tiny feet and held his breath till he turned blue and sqweamed and sqweamed every curse word under the sun he should still do the nest job that he could and I dont see that he's tried.

Its as clear as the grimaces on our faces hes off and we should have had all this sorted a year ago. But we have to NOW seriously get into the market for a replacement.

Do we go for a LW or a RW and put Pully over o LW?

Whether one way or the other we got options like  Coutinho,Chiesa,Isco,Werner, Malcom,Lozano,Bailey, Coman.Bertrand Traore, and probably another 20 that Mz @Vesper will add on.But we do need to do it now,

Whats your options guys?

The club would be silly to try and replace Hazard directly just like when they needed to replace Lampard, we brought in a completely different player and changed the approach. I think for the club to adequately replace him, it needs two players to be purchased.

I don't see anyone else that can replace the chance creation and dribbling ability of Hazard being able to conjure something out of nothing.

I do think though that there are wide players who are quicker, can play in a more direct way rather than feeling the need to drop deep and are more comfortable and prepared to press high and aggressively. There are players who can operate out wide also who may not be as creative but can offer similar or potentially better goal outputs.

For me the club would need to concentrate on buying a goal scoring winger who plays more direct than Hazard and would replace his goal output and a much more creative player to play the central midfield role who would in theory take over the creative output that you lose from Hazard.

[Unionjack 7,531]

5 minutes ago, Superblue_1986 said:

The club would be silly to try and replace Hazard directly just like when they needed to replace Lampard, we brought in a completely different player and changed the approach. I think for the club to adequately replace him, it needs two players to be purchased.

I don't see anyone else that can replace the chance creation and dribbling ability of Hazard being able to conjure something out of nothing.

I do think though that there are wide players who are quicker, can play in a more direct way rather than feeling the need to drop deep and are more comfortable and prepared to press high and aggressively. There are players who can operate out wide also who may not be as creative but can offer similar or potentially better goal outputs.

For me the club would need to concentrate on buying a goal scoring winger who plays more direct than Hazard and would replace his goal output and a much more creative player to play the central midfield role who would in theory take over the creative output that you lose from Hazard.

Names! Easy to say goal scoring winger.

And we NEVER did replace Lamps. Never even got close to a similar type. If we had one now then we wouldn't be in this much shite.

[Special Juan 27,424]

11 hours ago, Unionjack said:

Not a thing said about Eden today. Shock!

Fucking garbage like the rest.

[DDA 9,690]

Eden was awful yesterday. Again we will have to see the Hazard fanboys defend him with their lives because he couldn't possibly dribble unnecessarily into dead ends, make the wrong runs or make the wrong pass over and over again. Not Hazard, no! On a positive note, I don't think I saw him make one ridiculous backpass yesterday. 

[OneMoSalah 8,776]

11 hours ago, Unionjack said:

Not a thing said about Eden today. Shock!

Because if anybody dares to criticze Eden certain members pop up saying that it is controversial of wrong to criticize him or have some excuse.

Has been the same shit for years, folk act as if hes the only ever top player to have pulled on the shirt for us (hes not, he could be one of the very top top ones but I dont even think he will be in the Lampard, Drogba, Cech, Terry bracket because those guys were world class, never lost their desire, won trophies during the club's most successful period). Although if Willian, Pedro, Alonso, Jorginho, Azpilicueta, David Luiz, Morata or whoever play like Eden has done at times the last few years theres a virtual pitchfork mob trying to chase them out the club. 

Eden is world class but you wouldnt think that at all recently. Needs a rocket up his arse. He may not like playing false 9 but instead of acting like a baby, constantly swinging his arms up to complain or that in games, he has to work, do the job and do it well. End of story. Same with everybody else in the team.

[Unionjack 7,531]

On 1/20/2019 at 1:50 PM, OneMoSalah said:

Eden is world class

When HE wants to be. And thats been the same with him since we first bought him.

I've said many times theres not a better sight in football than WHEN Eden shows up and hes doing his shit.

But then theres the weeks on end that he offers nothing much at all.

He should be able to reach deep down and lead by example.

I'm not getting on only at him as we have been in this situation every other year and even on those good years have a spell like it.

Apart of course years when we FTW!

Ahhh! Maybe one day again!

 

[Superblue 6,370]

34 minutes ago, Unionjack said:

Names! Easy to say goal scoring winger.

And we NEVER did replace Lamps. Never even got close to a similar type. If we had one now then we wouldn't be in this much shite.

Exactly my point we replaced Lampard with Fabregas - a completely different player but changed the style and approach to his strengths rather than Lampard's and we've won 2 league titles since then.

With regards to names I'm not sure, I don't watch the amount of European football i wish I could when i was younger but City brought Sane, Liverpool brought Mane and Salah. There are players out there who would suit the system we're trying to play with the characteristics we're looking for. The scouting department need to pull their fingers out.

Or we convince CHO to stay and give him that opportunity.

[Vesper 28,772]

35 minutes ago, Unionjack said:

Names! Easy to say goal scoring winger.

I don't care how crazy it sounds, but we should have a go at Mbappe. I already showed how to pay for both him and Icardi and have hundreds of millions of quid left over to further boost the squad all over.

Oki, now back to the reality of our fucked up board

the main wingers we should be targeting (I am listing every single one I rate for us)

and this is with CHO and Eden leaving

 

LW

Vinícius Júnior (try to force a swap for Hazard, probably zero chance RM goes for it, who knows, I would so so accept him plus £50m for Eden at thsi point)

Hirving Lozano 

Marco Asensio

Thomas Lemar

Thorgan Hazard

Ismaïla Sarr

Steven Bergwijn

Mikel Oyarzabal

Kingsley Coman

 

youth

Rodrygo (same as Vinícius Júnior, but still in Brasil, Real already bought him too (over £40m)

Willem Geubbels

Justin Kluivert

Javairô Dilrosun

 

 

 

RW

Nicolas Pépé

Suso

Leon Bailey

Federico Chiesa

Malcom

Florian Thauvin

David Neres

Federico Bernardeschi

Iñaki Williams

Wilfried Zaha

 

youth

Samuel Chukwueze

Ferrán Torres

Reiss Nelson

Yann Karamoh

 

feel free to add, I think that if ALL of these were removed from any chance or us buying

we would BE FUCKED

 

[Shakez 755]

Welp, Hazard stating what we've known all along...

[whats happening 1,525]

i dont get this quote, what is he trying to say

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

After the match yesterday, got the feeling 99% he will be leaving in the summer, no matter who we buy now and later or what we achieve this season. “Can’t wait to see Pulisic and Hazard playing” not going to happen imo. The good thing is that I think we have already got his replacement in Pulisic.

Just spent the rest of the money we got to buy 1-2 more players Sarri needed. I hope I am wrong, and he surprised me by signing the extension though. The thing I could only see 1% chance it would be happening at the moment.