Eden Hazard

[Roquila 1,335]

1 minute ago, Polo7 said:

Costa's attitude had a negative effect on Hazards morale today. Thats the only explanation for the shit show he had today. Or can we used tiredness? 

If this is Sarcams than i'll bite. 

Does this qualify as an excuse in 2016 now ?? 

No excuses, he was shit. Di Maria at United shit. Torres shit. Akinfewa shit.

[MefiX19 1,092]

He was really bad, but he had the ball near his feet like 2-3 times in the first half and Costa was selfish

[Adnane 1,101]

Gotta love people here slagging off Eden with Cahill's topic inactive since July 30  

 

[bababoom 4,478]

Always bottles one on ones, every time... 

[Sir Mikel OBE 4,920]

1 minute ago, Adnane said:

Gotta love people here slagging off Eden with Cahill's topic inactive since July 30  

 

Oh we'll get to him.

[Stingray 9,441]

Mmmm. Some cursed me on here when KDB came up as possibly the better talent. Eden started ok, but the game got to him and he underperformed. Both him and KDB need a good vibe to perform. If the vibe is good, they are world class. If their team is into a downfall, they go down with them. #belgianissues #pussies

Verzonden vanaf mijn iPad met Tapatalk

[Stingray 9,441]

If this is Sarcams than i'll bite. 

Does this qualify as an excuse in 2016 now ?? 

No excuses, he was shit. Di Maria at United shit. Torres shit. Akinfewa shit.

Nowhere near Torres shit tbh [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]

Verzonden vanaf mijn iPad met Tapatalk

[TheIceMan 596]

The Old Hazard's back!!!

[Adnane 1,101]

Wow. 

He litterally was nowhere as bad as you guys suggest. 

Easily created our best movements, should have got a couple of assists and maybe a goal if he was more clinical on his one on one. 

One average ( not even bad ) performance and people are already claiming he is back to last season ? 

You guys are UNBELIEVABLE. 

[MrExcalibur100 7,124]

When Hazard isn't involved earlie in our attacking play, (no thanks to Costa and especially Oscar), we struggle to win football matches. And it's not for a lack of trying. He was making a lot of runs off the ball in this game but those two aforementioned players hardly ever passed him the ball.

The first goal was them failing to clear their lines. Second goal, off a deflection. 

Chelsea = no Hazard / no party. This is blindingly obvious. 

[Jase 43,479]

Bottled that one-on-one...

[Eidur the Spider 4,515]

He bottled the one on one for sure

But Costa also angered me too seconds later trying to get a free kick by diving rather than going in for the kill. Pretty embarrassing bit of play for all involved I think. I was fucking furious so God knows what Conte has to say about it. Someone's waking up with a horses head in their bed.  

[Johnnyeye 7,462]

2 minutes ago, Jason said:

Bottled that one-on-one...

more than once, he didn´t take on defenders as much as he should, its a shame, because he has that ability and more.

[Mufassir08 2,400]

Not a vintage Hazard performance but bar the last 5-10 mins, he was still pretty decent. Also, whenever Hazard is gonna have an off game, are we gonna say stuff like "he's back to his last years form" and what not? Eden was brilliant during the first 3 games, let's not jump the gun and claim that he's back to his 2015 self. That said, He really should've taken the shot instead of passing it to Diego as he was in the better position to score and the angle did not suit Diego at all.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

The haters already creeping out of their hideouts I see...

[Jase 43,479]

1 hour ago, MrExcalibur100 said:

When Hazard isn't involved earlie in our attacking play, (no thanks to Costa and especially Oscar), we struggle to win football matches. And it's not for a lack of trying. He was making a lot of runs off the ball in this game but those two aforementioned players hardly ever passed him the ball.

The first goal was them failing to clear their lines. Second goal, off a deflection. 

Chelsea = no Hazard / no party. This is blindingly obvious. 

Think that couldn't be more obvious in the last 10-15 minutes or so. Everyone's first option to pass to was Hazard.

Honestly, based on what we have seen so far, if we don't have Costa, Hazard and Kante, we are going to be so screwed!

[kellzfresh 7,229]

1 minute ago, Jason said:

Think that couldn't be more obvious in the last 10-15 minutes or so. Everyone's first option to pass to was Hazard.

Honestly, based on what we have seen so far, if we don't have Costa, Hazard and Kante, we are going to be so screwed!

Exactly Willian, Oscar and Matic are average Joes. Kante, Hazard and Costa are the main guys 

[Jase 43,479]

53 minutes ago, Johnnyeye said:

more than once, he didn´t take on defenders as much as he should, its a shame, because he has that ability and more.

Disagree about him not taking defenders on.

He bottled that one-on-one but on the other hand, he saved our ass (IIRC) by committing a tactical foul when Swansea countered and could have been free on goal.