Roman Abramovich Thread

[BlueLyon 9,359]

3 hours ago, Vesper said:

big spending Chels is a myth (except for first two years)

 

here is our net spending under Roman

Transfer spending under Abramovich (net)

2003-04: £151.4m
2004-05: £146.8m

NO MORE BIG SPENDING

2005-06: £51.7m
2006-07: £32.2m
2007-08: £13.8m

2008-09: £12.7m PROFIT
2009-10: £23.6m
2010-11: £94.5m

here is the last 8 years

2011-12: £57.7m
2012-13: £75.8m

2013-14  £47.6m

2014-15  £6.4m PROFIT

2015-16  £2.7m

2016-17  £21.9m

2017-18 £54.1m

2018-19 £75.1m (partial)

total

£328.5 for the last 8 years (365.8m euros)

that's almost a BILLION LESS than the article >>> ( https://www.talkchelsea.net/news/chelseas-spending-since-2010-has-been-revealed-and-its-ridiculous/ ) states

£41.1m per year net spend on average

 

total £829.8 m over 16 year time frame that Abramovich has owned us 

works out to around £51.9m NET per year

36% of ALL money net spent was in the first 2 years

take away those first  2 years

the average net spend over last 14 seasons (per year) is £37.8m 

Its good that we sell many players to keep net spending low. But that doesnt change the fact that we fork 200+m every year on new players and generaly do it very bad.

For example two summers ago, we spend 260m on new players. Sure net spent was 60m, because we generated 200m from player sales.

BUT we still spent 260m, we had 260m to spend on new players. And what did we spend 260m on? Bakayokos, Morata, Drinkwaters. 

 260m, we could get top tier player or two.

Im not arguing about our net spend which is very very good. But about the fact we have 200m+ to spend per season and we dont show for it.

[Vesper 30,083]

42 minutes ago, BlueLyon said:

Its good that we sell many players to keep net spending low. But that doesnt change the fact that we fork 200+m every year on new players and generaly do it very bad.

For example two summers ago, we spend 260m on new players. Sure net spent was 60m, because we generated 200m from player sales.

BUT we still spent 260m, we had 260m to spend on new players. And what did we spend 260m on? Bakayokos, Morata, Drinkwaters. 

 260m, we could get top tier player or two.

Im not arguing about our net spend which is very very good. But about the fact we have 200m+ to spend per season and we dont show for it.

The players we buy mostly turn out either blääää or are shown to be instant or eventual shit. Our success ratio is horrendous. Many of the good ones we end up selling for far too low.

Drinkwater is the first type.

KdB the second.

[mccg 1,528]

Chelsea fans sent worrying Roman Abramovich transfer message by Sky Sports man

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/756696/Chelsea-transfer-news-Roman-Abramovich-Maurizio-Sarri-Sky-Sports

[DDA 9,924]

3 hours ago, mccg said:

Chelsea fans sent worrying Roman Abramovich transfer message by Sky Sports man

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/756696/Chelsea-transfer-news-Roman-Abramovich-Maurizio-Sarri-Sky-Sports

Nothing we don't know already, although I would like to remind everyone that we broke the World Record fee for a GK only in the last window.

[Unionjack 7,531]

10 minutes ago, DDA said:

Nothing we don't know already, although I would like to remind everyone that we broke the World Record fee for a GK only in the last window.

Its just a load of old tosh created to stir shit and give clicks!

[OhForAGreavsie 6,057]

15 minutes ago, DDA said:

Nothing we don't know already, although I would like to remind everyone that we broke the World Record fee for a GK only in the last window.

Exactly, this can only be news for non-Chelsea fans. That said I think the report is probably inaccurate to say Roman won't sanction big money signings. It's more likely true to say that he won't sanction unfunded spending and that's pretty much been the case for a while. Years in fact.

[Unionjack 7,531]

1 minute ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

Exactly this can only be news for non-Chelsea fans. That said I think the report is probably inaccurate to say Roman won't sanction big money signings. It's more likely true to say that he won't sanction unfunded spending and that's pretty much been the case for a while. Years in fact.

What he should be doing is sanctioning the selling of our own Ikea store so we can put that money to good use instead of it bleeding the bank thru paid wages, losing  value and getting rusty and useless.

He should be getting us a real DOF!

[Vesper 30,083]

Roman supposedly will not sell to any British buyer (buried in the Kepa story)

WHAT THE FUCKERY

https://blogs.elconfidencial.com/deportes/a-mi-bola/2019-03-04/abramovich-kepa-chelsea-sarri-venta_1858210/

Abramovich and the sale of Chelsea

The most curious of all is that Abramovich also has put on sale to own Chelsea, for an amount that exceeds 2,500 million pounds and one condition: that the London club does not fall in any case in the hands of an English buyer . As is well known, the Russian tycoon lost his British residence by not renewing his special residence permit as a prominent investor in the United Kingdom and has taken up residence in Tel Aviv . Like all Jews, and Roman is, he is entitled to Israeli nationality by the so-called Law of Return . The Hebrew press was the first to report that the owner of the Chelsea lodged the application with the Israeli Embassy in Moscow and a few days later he was a citizen there.

[Nicco 927]

1 hour ago, Vesper said:

Roman supposedly will not sell to any British buyer (buried in the Kepa story)

WHAT THE FUCKERY

https://blogs.elconfidencial.com/deportes/a-mi-bola/2019-03-04/abramovich-kepa-chelsea-sarri-venta_1858210/

Abramovich and the sale of Chelsea

The most curious of all is that Abramovich also has put on sale to own Chelsea, for an amount that exceeds 2,500 million pounds and one condition: that the London club does not fall in any case in the hands of an English buyer . As is well known, the Russian tycoon lost his British residence by not renewing his special residence permit as a prominent investor in the United Kingdom and has taken up residence in Tel Aviv . Like all Jews, and Roman is, he is entitled to Israeli nationality by the so-called Law of Return . The Hebrew press was the first to report that the owner of the Chelsea lodged the application with the Israeli Embassy in Moscow and a few days later he was a citizen there.

Saudi Arabia has hit a roadblock with Glazis who don't want to sell United just saying Roman if you want to sell it to someone 

[Vesper 30,083]

Just now, Nicco said:

Saudi Arabia has hit a roadblock with Glazis who don't want to sell United just saying Roman if you want to sell it to someone 

from an oligarch chased planet wide due to the yanks v Putin to head.chopper trillionaires

we would retire the most hated owners trophy on a perm basis!

[Romans disciples 26]

Roman is the most admired owner in world football .

[Vesper 30,083]

26 minutes ago, Romans disciples said:

Roman is the most admired owner in world football .

lol, based off WHAT???