Jump to content

Hazard or Maoura or both?


 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

HAHA I thought the topic was 'Hazard or Malouda' :lol:

Hazard though, I haven't seen any of Maoura... and his name is too much like Malouda :lol:

His name is spelt 'Moura'. The title has his name mispelt. Moura is pronounced like 'More-ah' so it sounds nothing like Malouda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't matter they will benched by Kalouda :Goober:

Hazard easily if i am honest.

For me i am not sure if Lucas will be a world beater or be like Angel Di Maria. He can be a headless chicken at times.

I would say Lucas probably has a higher ceiling, because of his close control and dribbling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for me Moura is half Ronaldinho (dribbling, creativity, odd skills) half Valencia (powerful, bullet shooting, lightning quick)

for guys who keep saying 'not proven in Europe'.... every damn guy doing business knows THE HIGHER THE RISK THE HIGHER THE REWARD, yet it depends on the guy WHO HAS THE BALLS FOR IT...!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Lucas does join us,he will leave us after a few years for Inter and Hazard would do the same but only for Madrid.Better idea would be to play KDB, a true Chelsea fan who will probably pledge his future here for a long time.Commitment just brings out more energy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THE HIGHER THE RISK THE HIGHER THE REWARD

Oh so you mean like £50 Million Torres?.........

If Lucas does join us,he will leave us after a few years for Inter and Hazard would do the same but only for Madrid.

You and other people need to stop thinking like this. Who knows who appealing Madrid or Inter will be in a few years? Inter may not improve or be even worse in a few years. The next Liverpool. We may win alot and become one of the best sides in the world again and maybe Madrid won't be. Not every player will want to leave for another club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh so you mean like £50 Million Torres?.........

don't be so dumb, are U want me to make a lecture on BUSINESS RISKS or what?

Torres was a typical of what I was talking about... Chelsea board did not want to take a risk like they did with Sheva so they went for Torres, who is a PROVEN striker in the Premier League and paid the price, whereas Liverpool went with Suarez - half the price but double the risk & the gamble paid off....! The Chelsea ppl did not just have the balls for it

we could hv had Suarez + Ba + Cisse for 50m

P.S I love Torres the most (but only after he joined us, earlier he was topping on my hate list along with Rooney)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You