🇳🇱 Nathan Aké

[BlueLyon 9,359]

4 minutes ago, Iggy Doonican said:

Don't think that's true at all who exactly ?. Lukaku might well have felt aggrieved being kept out of the side by Eto and especially Torres. No footballers enjoy sitting on the bench apart from Winston Bogarde.

Lukaku wasnt better than Etoo at that moment. He wasnt. And he decided to leave the year we bought Costa.

Generaly there are many who didnt want to stay little longer here. Sturridge then, now Solanke. Mata too but he isnt exactly youngster.

Im only saying they must earn starting place. You dont just play them week in week out so they can get their feet running and hit form. Its one or two games, if coach is happy they will play. Unless we want to be like Borussia and sacrifice the results.

Rashford is staying put at United. He knew his chances will be limited and he didnt push for move. Neither did Martial. And Martial had much better season last year than Lukaku at Chelsea.

Martial could get realy pissed and move out when they signed Ibra. And Im sure Luaku would be throwing tantrums if he was in Martial's position. But he stayed.

Either our youngsters dont have the character or the talent.

Back then Lukaku had almost no link up ability, which is crucial for top team. I understand he was kept out by Etoo and then by Costa. But he wanted to play week in week out, how is that Chelsea fault for not giving him play time? He wasnt good enough, simple as that.

[Iggy Doonican 4,186]

10 minutes ago, BlueLyon said:

Lukaku wasnt better than Etoo at that moment. He wasnt. And he decided to leave the year we bought Costa.

Generaly there are many who didnt want to stay little longer here. Sturridge then, now Solanke. Mata too but he isnt exactly youngster.

Im only saying they must earn starting place. You dont just play them week in week out so they can get their feet running and hit form. Its one or two games, if coach is happy they will play. Unless we want to be like Borussia and sacrifice the results.

Rashford is staying put at United. He knew his chances will be limited and he didnt push for move. Neither did Martial. And Martial had much better season last year than Lukaku at Chelsea.

Martial could get realy pissed and move out when they signed Ibra. And Im sure Luaku would be throwing tantrums if he was in Martial's position. But he stayed.

Either our youngsters dont have the character or the talent.

Back then Lukaku had almost no link up ability, which is crucial for top team. I understand he was kept out by Etoo and then by Costa. But he wanted to play week in week out, how is that Chelsea fault for not giving him play time? He wasnt good enough, simple as that.

Whether you think Eto was better than Lukaku is one thing but a raw kid instead of Torres leave it out. Mourinho just doesn't trust youngsters any other manager and Lukaku would have started more. Mata? he never asked for a move think you're rewriting history a bit mate.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

52 minutes ago, Iggy Doonican said:

Whether you think Eto was better than Lukaku is one thing but a raw kid instead of Torres leave it out. Mourinho just doesn't trust youngsters any other manager and Lukaku would have started more. Mata? he never asked for a move think you're rewriting history a bit mate.

Lukaku simply wasnt good enough. Or had poor mentality, didnt convince Mou on training. Conte isnt playing Bats either for example. Dont you think its weird that Conte insisted on playing Costa despite being out of form? And only gave chance to Bats once our title was more or less secured? I certainly trust Conte, despite all talent Bats had, he was not mentaly on the level to lead our line. The boy has alot to learn, but he must take every chance he gets. I hope we keep him as our second choice this year tbh. Lukaku was pretty much the same, but he decided to leave.

Rashford is playing well and enough at United under Mourinho. Meanwhile Shaw and Martial are not, basicaly because of their attitude, despite they have talent. Mourinho clearly gave chance to players that are actualy level headed, like Varane at Real, Rashford at United. He might not be the best man for youth, he is pragmatic first, but those who truly show it, they play. 

Under Mou, I see Lukaku as immature boy, trying too hard, instead of keeping head down and learn. At one point he had enough and decided to leave, which was best for his career. But who knows, if he is as good as some say here, if he stayed, he might as well be a starter at Chelsea past season.

I absolutely agree about Torres tho, he should left or got benched long time before it actualy happened. 

About Mata; 

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/715399/Jose-Mourinho-Juan-Mata-Manchester-United-Chelsea-transfer-news-gossip

"He was the one wanting to leave", Im not making it up.

 

[Iggy Doonican 4,186]

15 minutes ago, BlueLyon said:

Lukaku simply wasnt good enough. Or had poor mentality, didnt convince Mou on training. Conte isnt playing Bats either for example. Dont you think its weird that Conte insisted on playing Costa despite being out of form? And only gave chance to Bats once our title was more or less secured? I certainly trust Conte, despite all talent Bats had, he was not mentaly on the level to lead our line. The boy has alot to learn, but he must take every chance he gets. I hope we keep him as our second choice this year tbh. Lukaku was pretty much the same, but he decided to leave.

Rashford is playing well and enough at United under Mourinho. Meanwhile Shaw and Martial are not, basicaly because of their attitude, despite they have talent. Mourinho clearly gave chance to players that are actualy level headed, like Varane at Real, Rashford at United. He might not be the best man for youth, he is pragmatic first, but those who truly show it, they play. 

Under Mou, I see Lukaku as immature boy, trying too hard, instead of keeping head down and learn. At one point he had enough and decided to leave, which was best for his career. But who knows, if he is as good as some say here, if he stayed, he might as well be a starter at Chelsea past season.

I absolutely agree about Torres tho, he should left or got benched long time before it actualy happened. 

About Mata; 

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/715399/Jose-Mourinho-Juan-Mata-Manchester-United-Chelsea-transfer-news-gossip

"He was the one wanting to leave", Im not making it up.

 

The words Daily Express and gossip are from gospel truth son. Don't follow the comings and goings of Man United so I can't comment on that. The Bats one is an odd one granted, personally I think given time he could come good. But it's all getting a bit predictable Bats will go on loan have a great season elsewhere and sit on the bench for us the following season.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

2 minutes ago, Iggy Doonican said:

The words Daily Express and gossip are from gospel truth son. Don't follow the comings and goings of Man United so I can't comment on that. The Bats one is an odd one granted, personally I think given time he could come good. But it's all getting a bit predictable Bats will go on loan have a great season elsewhere and sit on the bench for us the following season.

I know Mou can talk bs, but I would believe him on that one.

It makes sense why we sold him so quickly. 

[Strike 7,489]

14 hours ago, BlueLyon said:

I tried ti quote you in another thread but then couldnt find the post, anyway its basicaly same topic so I will just quote you here...

I dont think we are as bad with youth as some imply. Yes we messed up with KdB big time and maybe Bertrand, but thats about it. 

I dont get this; player should get chance. They do get chance. But its not like they will play 10, 20 games in season. 

We apparently had so many great youngsters we didnt give them chance. I dont buy it. They are simply not good enough. Doing it in youth levels is entirely different than senior level. They are average on senior level, thats why they dont and didnt play more for us. Its the sad truth.

We loaned several players out, to foreign leagues, to championship, to PL. Several didnt even get to play regular football. And we are to blame for loanining them out instead of giving them a chance? If they were good, they would play, they would play well and return here. And continue playing. But most didnt play on loan or played very average, thats why they got sold and we hear almost nothing about them. 

Lahm was loaned to stuttgart and played well. He returned to bayerna, got a game and played well. He didnt get 30 games to catch form. RLC is getting playtime and he is absolutely average most of time. How can someone keep giving him playtime? Mceachran, Boga, Solanke, Lukaku...they were loaned, but never made any serious waves. We cant just give them playtime. And when they sit on bench, they start complaining like they are the biggest stars in football. We are not ideal club for youngsters indeed, but if there was world class talent here, they would play. Again, only one of such calibre was KdB, in this case the board made big mistake. 

With Ake, its different, he was good but we are simply stuffed in this department. Christensen will get that role. Then there is Zouma. We all know Ake might be realy good one day and if that clause is real, we can easily get him back. 

The best example is Courtois clearly. He was loaned, he took his chance and he is now playing here because he is top player. Christensen has potential to be similar. 

I agree with RLC and Zouma getting chances and Courtois and Eden's quality was evident when they were 20 itself. 

But consider KdB, Bertrand, Lukaku, Sturridge, Not all world class but certainly top talents the club didn't handle well. The club should have a plan or a policy to integrate youngsters, like this season, I hope Christensen is given a chance to establish himself and Virgil or whoever is not bought for 60 million. 

[mccg 1,528]

CHERRIES CONFIDENT ON AKE

Bournemouth are increasingly confident that they are close to agreeing a deal to sign Chelsea defender Nathan Ake, according to Sky sources.

Sky Sports News HQ understands Southampton and Leicester are also interested in signing the 22-year-old centre-back.

Ake, valued in the region of £20m, spent the first of last season on loan at Bournemouth before being recalled in January. 

Grrr And double Grrr

[mccg 1,528]

Only a guide but ffs , i'll be suprised if Ake dosn't go!

Nathan Ake Loan deals do count

Bournemouth 1/10

Watford 20/1

West Ham 20/1

Everton 20/1

To Stay at Chelsea (Does not include returning on loan following a permanent deal elsewhere) 6/1

Nemanja Matic Loan deals do count

[Special Juan 28,141]

He's simply not going to get game time here. We are supposedly close to signing VvD, even if not him, it will be someone else. We have Cahill, Luiz, possibly AC coming back from Germany and even the left side is covered with the possible arrival of Sandro and Alonso as back up.

20M is good money for a player that probably wouldn't kick a ball but for League Cup games.

[Magic Lamps 11,692]

But he is so versatile. He can play LB, LWB, DM and CB. 20m would represent a very good return on investment given we paid like 6m for him. Probably too much to turn down if all he would do here is to make up the numbers. 

[Fernando 6,585]

12 minutes ago, Magic Lamps said:

But he is so versatile. He can play LB, LWB, DM and CB. 20m would represent a very good return on investment given we paid like 6m for him. Probably too much to turn down if all he would do here is to make up the numbers. 

Sometimes selling them can do good to them. They will feel settled. 

This is what Real Madrid does, but the best thing is that they put in a buy back clause. 

They did it for Carvajal, and Morata recently. It's about time we do the same and if the players improve in two season we just buy them back. 

[xPetrCechx 13,571]

Buyback  

[mccg 1,528]

V.Sad to see him go if he does , another massive backward step for our academy, loan army process imho , good enough for 1st team, with champions league footie and law of averages injuries/suspensions player fatigue, plenty of opportunities for Ake this season.

[xPetrCechx 13,571]

Buyback  

[akgw13 867]

"Will demand a buy-back option" Most important words, with those it is essentially a loan deal in my eyes if the player lives up to his potential. Ake wants to be there and play, we want Ake to play and develop, Bournemouth wants a young good CB. All parties win. Go and play young man and be so good we are killing to buy you back!

[OhForAGreavsie 6,075]

On 25/06/2017 at 7:59 PM, Iggy Doonican said:

Don't think that's true at all who exactly ?. Lukaku might well have felt aggrieved being kept out of the side by Eto and especially Torres. No footballers enjoy sitting on the bench apart from Winston Bogarde.

Hello Iggy,

You made a brilliant point. Players have been unhappy to be left out, naturally, but who has whinged? No one to my recollection. Don't agree with you about Winston Bogarde however. Bates & Hutchinson treated him badly. They shamefully vilified and scapegoated him for something that was entirely their own fault.

Bogarde was lured to the club by the offer of a contract that clearly overpriced his value to the team. That contract employed him be a professional footballer, with all that entails; train right, eat right and play to the best of his ability whenever selected. Winston did all of that. He kept his side of the bargain. He was entitled to expect Chelsea to keep theirs.

The problem, of course, is that Winston's abilities were not good enough. That, quite openly, was the opinion of Luca Vialli, yet our Chairman & CEO proceeded with the deal. I think the plan was to bring him in on a free, then sell him on at a profit. They could see choppy financial waters ahead so, tempted by the lure of a quick and easy profit, they gambled. Unfortunately they shot themselves in the foot by offering too big a pay packet to a player who simply wasn't worth it. Luca knew it, all the clubs to whom our leaders would later try to palm off Bogarde knew it, even you and I knew it.

Ken did some things for which Chelsea fans should respect him, but his treatment of Winston Bogarde was dishonourable and he should apologise. It's by no means the only mea culpa he owes but he has form, so we know he won't be paying up any time soon. 

[Tomo 21,751]

20 hours ago, Iggy Doonican said:

Whether you think Eto was better than Lukaku is one thing but a raw kid instead of Torres leave it out. Mourinho just doesn't trust youngsters any other manager and Lukaku would have started more. Mata? he never asked for a move think you're rewriting history a bit mate.

I don't think many manager's aiming to win the league would have a 20 year old leading the line, especially when the attacking midfielders were also early 20's. We probably wouldn't have got top four with that combination and certainly wouldn't have gone near the title.

[Tomo 21,751]

8 hours ago, Strike said:

I agree with RLC and Zouma getting chances and Courtois and Eden's quality was evident when they were 20 itself. 

But consider KdB, Bertrand, Lukaku, Sturridge, Not all world class but certainly top talents the club didn't handle well. The club should have a plan or a policy to integrate youngsters, like this season, I hope Christensen is given a chance to establish himself and Virgil or whoever is not bought for 60 million. 

KDB and Sturridge ill give, but what could the club have done differently with Bertrand and Lukaku? Bertrand's level is a squad player at a top club or a starter at a mid level one, he wanted the latter. Lukaku wouldn't accept number two behind Costa so he left.

[Strike 7,489]

1 hour ago, Tomo said:

KDB and Sturridge ill give, but what could the club have done differently with Bertrand and Lukaku? Bertrand's level is a squad player at a top club or a starter at a mid level one, he wanted the latter. Lukaku wouldn't accept number two behind Costa so he left.

Bertrand - When Cole's form tailed off, and Jose played Azpilicueta there, it could have been Bertrand getting a run at Left Back. When Lukaku was initially loaned to WBA, there was Torres and Ba at the club but yeah, Lukaku threw his toys out the pram.

I know, players have huge expectations of their role in the team but before sending out on loan, transfer, it would be good to give them the opportunity, especially when they have the potential of a KDB or a Sturridge. Three of the four were rightly frustrated I feel and a lot of it was down to Mourinho so I am hoping Conte changes that.

 

[Tomo 21,751]

46 minutes ago, Strike said:

Bertrand - When Cole's form tailed off, and Jose played Azpilicueta there, it could have been Bertrand getting a run at Left Back. When Lukaku was initially loaned to WBA, there was Torres and Ba at the club but yeah, Lukaku threw his toys out the pram.

I know, players have huge expectations of their role in the team but before sending out on loan, transfer, it would be good to give them the opportunity, especially when they have the potential of a KDB or a Sturridge. Three of the four were rightly frustrated I feel and a lot of it was down to Mourinho so I am hoping Conte changes that.

 

Lukaku wasn't ready for Chelsea in 2012, heck even West Brom he was often used more from bench. Azpi was brilliant as a left back, admittedly it should have been more a short term move but he was head and shoulders above anything I ever seen of Bertrand, who by the time he left was ridiculously overrated, probably more so than anyone on our books bar Torres (that fact not everyone thought he was total and utter shit makes him overrated by default).