Krypt 241 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 if they don't care about winning then what do they care about?Their Paycheck ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manpe 10,861 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 Their Paycheck ?I thought Terry was the one who had "match highest earner" clause in his contract, was he not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin_3d 1,140 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 Yes.Every single word he says will be twisted by the media, and once you break that silence.. there is no going back. I doubt he would be able to tell us anything Buck & Gourlay couldn't anyway. So it would be rather pointless, and would only make us look like a club in crisis.Interesting, but City owner came out and back Mancini and stated their goals.Then media just back of them.I don't think it might be that different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaJosh 45 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 You've put me in an awkward situation.I don't want to tell you that you're wrong, but you're clearly not very right... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 The players that original poster said don't care about winning also happen to be our best players. Therefore, if my calculations are correct, we're fucked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 Interesting, but City owner came out and back Mancini and stated their goals.Then media just back of them.I don't think it might be that different.Roman has been quiet for too long though, we don't want even more attention on him, it's bad enough Sky/BBC would rather show us multiple shots of Roman’s reactions from his executive box than the game itself. Roman is responsible for the manager merry go round, and blamed for every bad signing, whereas Mansour is relatively new on the scene. Breaking silence during a crisis season will only feed the press, and leave the fans wanting more. Besides, AVB has already confirmed that sealing a CL spot is the minimum requirement, so we already know Roman's amended objectives for the rest of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 Roman has been quiet for too long though, we don't want even more attention on him, it's bad enough Sky/BBC would rather show us multiple shots of Roman’s reactions from his executive box than the game itself. Roman is responsible for the manager merry go round, and blamed for every bad signing, whereas Mansour is relatively new on the scene. Breaking silence during a crisis season will only feed the press, and leave the fans wanting more. Besides, AVB has already confirmed that sealing a CL spot is the minimum requirement, so we already know Roman's amended objectives for the rest of the season.I've always imagined Mansour to be much more naive and immature than Roman. They both may be mega rich now, but how they gained their fortunes and how situations they grew up in couldn't be more different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiaretta985 131 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 after re-reading all of this, I take back whatever I said before! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,591 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 The English press hates Chelsea; they're extremely biased towards them. Every week there is the same rumor about AVB getting the axe.True Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,591 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 This post has some logic and some contradiction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beirut_Blues 306 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 therefore they should play. Our current coach and youngsters: Mata, Ramirez, Lukaku, Josh, Luiz etc, don't care about winning because they haven't been here for a long time. Chelsea's young fans also don't really care about winning because they haven't been here for a long time. People that have been here a long time have every right to complain about their bosses publicly because they are the only ones that really care about winning. I mean think about it: the only people that have Chelsea in their hearts are people that have been here a long time.How about u think about why Mata, Luiz, Ramires, Torres joined Chelsea.... not to lose believe me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beirut_Blues 306 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 Their Paycheck ?It's in their interest to play well and deliver... Just look at Torres, Del Bosque dropped him from the national team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson 358 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 This thread is confusing. And shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capriccioso 2,545 Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 I've always imagined Mansour to be much more naive and immature than Roman. They both may be mega rich now, but how they gained their fortunes and how situations they grew up in couldn't be more different.I know Roman had to work his way up from the gutter, did the Sheikh inherit his fortune? I like to think the Sheikh is like Yusuf Amir from GTA IV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 I know Roman had to work his way up from the gutter, did the Sheikh inherit his fortune? I like to think the Sheikh is like Yusuf Amir from GTA IV The United Arab Emirates are just a collection of Constitutional Monarchies and Mansour is royalty. In the UAE seven families rule over the country and the Al Nahyans (Mansour's family) rule over the Emirate of Abu Dhabi ( an Emirate is equivalent to Kingdom). The AL Nahyan's have a sum of about $USD 150 Billion.Think of it as if the Queen and British Royal family were the Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and every other high ranking MP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary gordon 1,777 Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 This thread should be a sticky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krypt 241 Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 It's in their interest to play well and deliver... Just look at Torres, Del Bosque dropped him from the national team.At the end of the day Torres has enough money to retire and do what he wants , it depends how much a player cares about football some players (not saying Torres) Probs dont care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kojo 4,676 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 I don't agree with this, but with a lot of young players coming in there could be some trouble. It might be wise to keep some players such as Malouda because we cannot change the team completely. Our attack is very young and new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 see no reason this thread has been bumped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneMoSalah 8,887 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Dont want to be honest, but I'm going to anyway. What the fuck are with these threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts