francozola 2,040 Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Just because Arse bought Mertesacker doesn't mean they don't need another CB lol. I don't think we'll get him tbh, we might try for him but at his age he'll probably want to go somewhere that will give him regular football Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanicus 5,208 Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 Chelsea 'set to pip Arsenal and Spurs to Gary Cahill transfer'Read more: http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/876907-chelsea-set-to-pip-arsenal-and-spurs-to-gary-cahill-transfer#ixzz1ZS0vRrbq Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
termninja 5,290 Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 AVB and Coyle are great friends so we may have an advantage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeB 1,281 Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 ^^ Ooh fuck We are gonna see this WE how unfocused, how average he is... especially since the start of the season...I don't worry about the transfert, the friendship between Coyle and AVB and the betting odds are two points who make the rumours proliferating Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starfluida 0 Posted October 6, 2011 Share Posted October 6, 2011 Modric first... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amblève. 4,995 Posted October 6, 2011 Share Posted October 6, 2011 We don't need Modric! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaoulQuaresma7 16 Posted October 6, 2011 Share Posted October 6, 2011 We don't need Modric!yes we do, modric will be a great player for us, and he can replace lampard within 2 years, and lampard will be a great tutor to him! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krypt 241 Posted October 6, 2011 Share Posted October 6, 2011 yes we do, modric will be a great player for us, and he can replace lampard within 2 years, and lampard will be a great tutor to him!Im not saying we need Modric but we need a player similar , the creative flair is what we need. Though getting back on Topic , im not sure getting Cahil will help our academy players getting through. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whinni09 37 Posted October 6, 2011 Share Posted October 6, 2011 yes we do, modric will be a great player for us, and he can replace lampard within 2 years, and lampard will be a great tutor to him!Lampard being a tutor to Modric? Don't think so since they have a different playing style, Xavi would be a great tutor to him but unfortunately we dont have him in our team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted October 6, 2011 Author Share Posted October 6, 2011 coughGaryCahillcough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson 358 Posted October 6, 2011 Share Posted October 6, 2011 coughGaryCahillcough.Who? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shak 22 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Alex will probably be sold at the end of this season. I dont think Gary Cahill is the solution for Chelsea's defence in the short term & in the long-term.I'd prefer to see how much Jeffrey Bruma learns/improves on his loan-spell at Hamburg as-well-as Hutchinson's miracle-comeback before we think of splashing the cash on Gary Cahill... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 The problem with Gary Cahill is that he is one part of the second worst defence in the League. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaoulQuaresma7 16 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Lampard being a tutor to Modric? Don't think so since they have a different playing style, Xavi would be a great tutor to him but unfortunately we dont have him in our team. not the same, they both attack, and im not talking about learning how to pass the ball or something, but mentaly and his lifestyle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeB 1,281 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 The problem with Gary Cahill is that he is one part of the second worst defence in the League.The main reason for the amount of goals conceided is that the midfield is over-exposed (it's the danger when you play in a 4-4-2) and that Knight, Steinsson and Robinson are shite this season. But the fact remains what you said, Cahill is part of that worst defense and the less we can say is that he is not well commited to his task !He is a little bit stupid, he had to confirm this season he could have the envergure to play in a top 6 club and in the same time prove people and Capello that he can be part of the squad for the Euro... He started badly the season, we can't rely that on the team's form, we can expect for a player with such ambitions to be better than that and show some good influence on his partners.But anyway he will be part of the England squad for the EC and it surely won't be the case of Dawson, Dann or Johnson... and even if his season performance will be average... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Chelsea 'set to pip Arsenal and Spurs to Gary Cahill transfer' Read more: http://www.metro.co....r#ixzz1ZS0vRrbqDoes ANYONE take Metro seriously???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shak 22 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 The main reason for the amount of goals conceided is that the midfield is over-exposed (it's the danger when you play in a 4-4-2) and that Knight, Steinsson and Robinson are shite this season. But the fact remains what you said, Cahill is part of that worst defense and the less we can say is that he is not well commited to his task !He is a little bit stupid, he had to confirm this season he could have the envergure to play in a top 6 club and in the same time prove people and Capello that he can be part of the squad for the Euro... He started badly the season, we can't rely that on the team's form, we can expect for a player with such ambitions to be better than that and show some good influence on his partners.But anyway he will be part of the England squad for the EC and it surely won't be the case of Dawson, Dann or Johnson... and even if his season performance will be average...I'd take Dawson & Dann (if both are fit and doing well for Spurs & Blackburn respectively) instead of Gary Cahill to Euro 2012... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krypt 241 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 I'd take Dawson & Dann (if both are fit and doing well for Spurs & Blackburn respectively) instead of Gary Cahill to Euro 2012...I think time will tell , im not convinced with Dawson , Dann is a great prospect and will be wasted playing at Blackburn. if we are to invest in Cahill , then i think he will be a capable signing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eldo 868 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 yes we do, modric will be a great player for us, and he can replace lampard within 2 years, and lampard will be a great tutor to him!26yo needs a tutor? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krypt 241 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 26yo needs a tutor?Maybe he is no good at Maths ? an established international needs tutor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.