Jump to content

Romelu Lukaku


Jose M
 Share

Recommended Posts

Some food for thought!

Romelu's career stats in official games:

2009-2010 - Anderlecht: 33 (competition games) 15 goals / 11 (european games) 4 goals => 19 goals

2010-2011 - Anderlecht: 37 (competition games) 16 goals / 11 (european games) 4 goals => 20 goals

2011-2012 - Anderlecht: 2 (competition games) 2 goals

2011-2012 - Chelsea: 08 (competition games) 0 goals => 0 goals

2012-2013 - West Brom: 35 (competition games) 17 goals => 17 goals

2013-2014 - Chelsea: 2 (competition games) 0 goals => 0 goals

2013-2014 - Everton: 31 (competition games) 15 goals => 15 goals

2014-2015 - Everton: 28 (competition games) 7 goals / 8 (european games) 7 goals => 14 goals (and counting)

The kid just proves he's an absolute solid goalscorer wherever he plays! Then to know that during the 2011-2014 seasons we were desperately in need of a scoring striker!!! :doh:

Really hate the Chelsea figures in these stats!!!!!!

The Chelsea figures are important. Scoring goals at West Bromwich Albion, Anderlecht and even Everton, to some extent, is in some ways easier. The team is effectively set up to play to its primary strength, i.e. its strikers, whereas at Chelsea there is no individual strength that it promoted or highlighted in any way. It is harder to score goals as a forward for Chelsea because of the primacy of its midfield players. The great strikers in that time period; the Drogbas, the Anelkas and the Costas (and even the Kalous) still managed to find the back of the net. Okay, Romelu barely had a sniff, but no goals in 15 senior appearances for the club is indicative of his struggles here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Chelsea figures are important. Scoring goals at West Bromwich Albion, Anderlecht and even Everton, to some extent, is in some ways easier. The team is effectively set up to play to its primary strength, i.e. its strikers, whereas at Chelsea there is no individual strength that it promoted or highlighted in any way. It is harder to score goals as a forward for Chelsea because of the primacy of its midfield players. The great strikers in that time period; the Drogbas, the Anelkas and the Costas (and even the Kalous) still managed to find the back of the net. Okay, Romelu barely had a sniff, but no goals in 15 senior appearances for the club is indicative of his struggles here.

Sure I can follow what you're saying. But we also have to take a blame here... We really didn't give him a proper chance (15 apps but 80% of the times he came in as a sub after 80 minutes).

I just think it's fair to say we (as a club) are the ones to blame in the Romelu case. I'm very sure with proper confidence and game time he would easily be scoring the same amount of goals for us.

But in dutch we say: Figs after Easter!! Which is also a nice proverb to use these days :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some food for thought!

Romelu's career stats in official games:

2009-2010 - Anderlecht: 33 (competition games) 15 goals / 11 (european games) 4 goals => 19 goals

2010-2011 - Anderlecht: 37 (competition games) 16 goals / 11 (european games) 4 goals => 20 goals

2011-2012 - Anderlecht: 2 (competition games) 2 goals

2011-2012 - Chelsea: 08 (competition games) 0 goals => 0 goals

2012-2013 - West Brom: 35 (competition games) 17 goals => 17 goals

2013-2014 - Chelsea: 2 (competition games) 0 goals => 0 goals

2013-2014 - Everton: 31 (competition games) 15 goals => 15 goals

2014-2015 - Everton: 28 (competition games) 7 goals / 8 (european games) 7 goals => 14 goals (and counting)

The kid just proves he's an absolute solid goalscorer wherever he plays! Then to know that during the 2011-2014 seasons we were desperately in need of a scoring striker!!! :doh:

Really hate the Chelsea figures in these stats!!!!!!

Not as simple as that, last season for example Eto'o was much more suited to us. It's not as easy as saying Lukaku would score goals and would have won us the league, there's also factors like general play, for example Hazards 2nd vs Newcastle last season would have never happened if Lukaku was playing instead of Samuel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure I can follow what you're saying. But we also have to take a blame here... We really didn't give him a proper chance (15 apps but 80% of the times he came in as a sub after 80 minutes).

I just think it's fair to say we (as a club) are the ones to blame in the Romelu case. I'm very sure with proper confidence and game time he would easily be scoring the same amount of goals for us.

But in dutch we say: Figs after Easter!! Which is also a nice proverb to use these days :)

He got chances but he didn't really take them and decided to leave.

Look at Harry Kane, he was only getting games in Europa early this season, but he was happy to go to Timbuktu and prove his worth, and is now reaping the rewards.

Either way, what's done is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everton just 6 points clear of the relegation area. Their league performance of this season is so bad and of course he is also part of that.

He scored 17 goals this season which is not bad. Everton don't really work this year and it's hard to score goals for a team like that.

I think Lukaku will play for a top side in a year or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Chelsea figures are important. Scoring goals at West Bromwich Albion, Anderlecht and even Everton, to some extent, is in some ways easier. The team is effectively set up to play to its primary strength, i.e. its strikers, whereas at Chelsea there is no individual strength that it promoted or highlighted in any way. It is harder to score goals as a forward for Chelsea because of the primacy of its midfield players. The great strikers in that time period; the Drogbas, the Anelkas and the Costas (and even the Kalous) still managed to find the back of the net. Okay, Romelu barely had a sniff, but no goals in 15 senior appearances for the club is indicative of his struggles here.

While I partly agree with both, and exactly thats why I dont know why its such shame to see KDB do well in wolfsburg. The kid would NEVER be as good here as he is there even with regular play time. Mourinho tactics, his role, pressure, difficult schedule, no way would KDB perform this great for us. So far he is big fish in small pond, lets see how he does in bigger team first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everytime I see him play I think thank fuck we sold him. He scored 17 goals, great. Does that include the 5 against Young boys? Does that include penalties? Dont believe he is good enough for Chelsea. His first touch is still shocking, looks like a pass at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He scored 17 goals this season which is not bad. Everton don't really work this year and it's hard to score goals for a team like that.

I think Lukaku will play for a top side in a year or two.

Yeh..and that side will most likely be Wolfsburg. They play at a good tempo & he's got enough pace and strength to worry most Bundesliga defenders..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You