Term-X

Is Eddie Newton going to follow him?.. I had a look at our site (after being told he still works for us with the youth team) but that's not the case.. where is he?

1. Arsenal - never met one Arsenal fan in real life or the net that I liked, hate their holier than thou attitude. 2. Man-City - The new City fans are delusional and the older ones are bitter. Most United fans aren't that bad, 'in my experience'... give it a few years and they'll become bitter with this new situation though.

^ If true, you can bet that new contract wasn't much of an improvement, the board are not idiots.. they know who's in the managers favour and who isn't.

Another angle of the 'incident'..

So fans who have different opinions or don't attend every game are not real Chelsea fans. Interesting theory.

Roman's son.

Pictures from after the game..

Let's enjoy the 'luxury' of having him while we can, it's the goalkeeper equivalent of Costa getting injured and having Falcao on the bench.

Well, surprise.. surprise.. Guess what image the daily mail chose to use for the headline; one that makes it look like Jose is punching Wenger and not the push.

Mourinho's suit game is the best it's ever been. Or at least a very close call between this and the CL one for Inter.

The best thing about the win is that last time Arsenal fans had an excuse.. i.e 'we had 10 men', this time they have no excuses. Even the Cahill incident is countered by the fact they should have had 2 sent off.

If Wenger doesn't get a touchline ban, pft.. double standards galore.

He's getting more of a rest between games this season, thanks to how competitive the squad is now, and it shows.

Jose wanted the result to do the talking, and after what happened with Tito/Barca he's rightfully taken the high road, those days are gone. Hope Wenger gets a touchline ban after that.

nvm.. got a sky stream now http://firstrows.biz/soccer/chelsea-arsenal-frsfg3ca

Is this being shown on Sky, I only have an NBC stream.. anyone got the Sky/BT Sport stream?

Ivanovic has naked pics of Jose, so no surprise Luis isn't starting.

Not enough to justify the £20m difference, what it comes down to.. is the fact Etihad are basically from the same family as the City owners, so they are practically sponsoring themselfs. *That £50m per season does not include the training complex, other companies are coming in for that.*

Nah, they are also getting extra revenue from separate sponsors for the training complex. In the same exact deal (shirt+stadium) Arsenal only get £30m per season, and they are more established as a brand and have more fans than City.

City will now be getting double what we're gonna get from Turkish Airlines.. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-city-set-400million-jackpot-4377857#ixzz3FGj4WLBb £50m per season, corrupt bastards.

^ Can someone please tell me what that post has to do with Luke Shaw, because I'm not sure even zolayes himself knows.

Thanks for that Liquidator, great post. Since this won't be on FFP books, it's up to Roman in regards to the cost.. if he's willing to do it then money isn't an object.

He's on 50k pw, before he signed.. the papers said he 'demanded' 100k+. You don't sign a 29 year old for £15m as a bench player. I'm sure if the club knew about the naked pics Ivanovic has of Jose they would have pushed for Shaw's signature; much better to have a youngster bide his time on the bench.

It was all an act for us.

Those wages proved to be bollocks, he's on far less than was reported.