killer1257

Schürrle,Cahill Instead of giving young,hungry kids a chance,Mourinho gives Schürrle,our worst offensive player, a chance.I can´t believe it

yes, it is called "i do not have balls philosophy"

I hate Mourinho´s youth system integration philosophy

I think that he just wants to rest Ivanovic

Please no,We already have Mikel... Khedira is always injured,is not able to dribble past opponent players and is passing skills are not that great.

So that means that we will have no live streams? If that should be the case,I hope that Mou will not play any of our young stars because if there are no streams,I will not be able to see our young stars play. I only see our young boys maybe once or twice the year playing in the first team,so it would be sad not to see them.

Maybe he is frustrated

I do not think that Hummels is one of the best centre backs in the world.He makes just too many mistakes. Cahill should have been sent off and he does not simply deserve to start the next 3 matches.Just give Zouma a chance.Maybe he plays good

Can I expect so see RLC or Boga on the bench?

I watched the game,but somehow I only focused on Cahill and Iva´s horrible performances.Did he play well?

Maybe because Iva is a weapon to defend corners and to score some goals from setpieces

I highly doubt that Reus will leave Dortmund in January

Hm,I think that we need him in the big games because Matic can´t to everything on his own.We need someone to help him.Somehow,Ramires is still not ready,so Mikel is the only solution we have

There is no reason for Hazard to sign a new contract.Chelsea can guarantee him nothing

I am quite sure that RLC,Baker,Boga and the others will also end like this. I hope that we will have a buy back clause because Thorgan always played good for them.If the buy them,I am sure that they will use him as an AM

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/417604/Newcastle-Moussa-Sissoko-Arsenal He says that he does not want to leave.

In my opinion,he was better than Ashley in his last 2 years.Ashley was nowhere near his peak and Bertrand had everything to replace him,but Chelsea did not give him enough minutes.Ashley did a lot of defense mistakes,which caused that we drpped a lot of points and offensively,he wasn´t great either.He was not the best LB in the PL anymore.Why not give Bertrand a chance,who has more stamina,is faster and better at crossing?Still Chelsea did not manage to give him a chance.Like you said,it is always about the manager.If he likes the youth,he will give you a chance.If he loves experience,you can simply leave the club. Everytime he played,he played good.I do not remember a bad game from him.At least he won the CL and I think that he deserves that.At least he got one good memory for him at Chelsea. Great guy,great character and he still said that he likes Chelsea,even though we treated him badly.

In my opinion,he should leave because he deserves a chance to play regular football every week.He will not be a starter here because Azpi is simply the best LB and he deserves something better. He loves Chelsea,but he once said that Chelsea always lied to him when it came about getting games at Chelsea.He said that the management always said to him that he will get his fair chance,but in the end,we know that he did not get his fair chance. It is what it is.Bertrand was maybe to patient.He should have left us when he was 22 or so.

I have seen them both for a long time and in my opinion,they both are overrated.They both have good shooting skils and maybe they are fast,but that´s basically it.They are quite limited players to be honest.Chelsea overpaid for Schürrle

I respect your opinion,too. I think that if we loan them out and we buy Barkley,they will have a problem after 3 years of loan because Barkley will already be a part of the starting line and it is hard to replace a player,who has already made good appearences for the club. Also,loaning out players is a way to develop players but is it the most succesful one?KDB did not make it,even though he destroyed the Bundesliga(he started to destroy the Bundesliga again),There was just one successful loan and that was Courtois.He made it because he was the best in the world and he kicked us out in the CL. Chalobah had one great season at Watford,had a very good pre season and Mou decided to loan him out to another club and this loan destroyed his developtment. RLC and Baker could easily end in the same path as Chalobah.The coaches do not have to play the loaned out player because some of them think about the long term situation of the club and long term wise,giving a loaned out player a chance is not thinking in the long term.Using him as a squad player like Mönchengladbach does itwith Thorgan makes sense.The only clubs that will give our players a chance are Vitesse and Besiktas and those leagues that they are playing are not even close to the PL. Matic made it here because there was no similar player at Chelsea and he did not have even a to fight for his place because there was no other player,who could compete for that role because noone was able to play the Makelele role apart from Matic.He had it really easy,while RLC and Baker will struggle fighting with Barkley because he would be an integral part of Chelsea.Mou is not even a coach that changes that much.He plays Iva,even if he plays 5 bad games in a row.He knows that Iva can be a big player when he needs him.Mou is not a coach who risks that much.That is way he did not give our youth team players a chance.He does not want to take that huge risk and nothing is wrong with that.Guardiola for example knows that he has less pressure than others and gives Gaudino a lot of playtime. You also talked about them being kids.Yeah,they are kids,but Messi,Ronaldo,Rooney etc. were also kids they played at top clubs.If we had Messi,we would loan him out three times and then,if he really impresses at those loans,maybe we will give him a chance.Even KDB did not make it,which is quite funny because he is much better than Schürrle. We had the chance to give RLC some minutes against Sporting and we did not give him these minutes.We could have given some minutes to Boga and Boga has some potential to become a great player.Why not give him at least a little bit of experience.I do not think that one CC match will destroy his career,even if he plays bad.Even Messi plays sometimes bad.That is normal. Some people in this forum said that even our worst players are better than Boga.Even if Boga is that bad,can he realy peform worse than Schürrle yesterday?Do you know how difficult it is to play worse than that?I do not say that Boga should have played yesterday,but he could have already made a debut this season Why did we buy Salah?Is it so difficult to give Boga a chance?Could not Boga play that kind of role? Chelsea always find a way to not integrate a youth team player.Maybe it is our phylosophy to not give a youth team player a chance.Barcelona,Bayern and other great clubs have the aim to produce great talents and then to give these players a chance. Chelseas last product was Terry and maybe he will be our last product for the next 10 years,which is quite ridicilous.

Ohh sorry,it seems that I have not read your last sentence.Yes,you are absolutely right.We just overpaid for him,but I still think he was a great left back,which would have been a real alternative to Azpi.The problem is now that he just got useless.He played yes,but not that much in the PL,which is the big thing for him in order to adapt.CL games will not make it easier for him to adapt to the PL. He needs games,but Mou did not give him enough playtime in the PL and now has become more or less useless.The thing he could do best was his crossing.We could see that many times,but now he did not have enough play time,so he can´t even do that. According to Spox(german football source),we paid 25 million € for him,which are around 20 mio pounds,according to google. BBC claims 16 million pounds,so yes,you are right again because bbc is more reliable

Why should it improve anything? Barkley would just get their position. 4-3-3 Cesc-Barkley ------Matic BU:Ramires,Mikel and Oscar No place for RLC or Baker.They would just get loaned out,maybe they play very good,come back again with a lot of hope,Mou does not play them and they will get sold because Barkley at that time would be already a part of the squad,so it is hard to win that battle. After one or two seasons,Chelsea will have lose a part of their identification because Terry will not be in the starting line up anymore,so no former youth team player in the Chelsea starting line up,which would be really sad,at least for me. Investing millions in an academy,producing good talents and then to buy players for millions of pounds,instead of giving the produced talents a chance is just wrong.

Why did we buy him if we do not want to give him a run of games?30 million for a squad player?Was Ashley not enough to be a squad player?Bertrand? Chelsea just wasted 30 millions on him.

If Barkley comes,RLC and Baker can say goodbye to their Chelsea career

A little bit too late,lol