nyikolajevics

We can do them simultaneously Making money from young players can help us finance new players.

Why not? We made a lot of money with signings like him.

Gignac signed for Tigre(Mexico). Surprising, I thought he would end up in the Premier League.

I think we should sell him this summer. Many teams are interested in him which increases his prices. I highly doubt he would be a starter here under Mourinho. Wolfsburg, Juve or Atleti would be nice for him,.

What? Really? How?

I am. I'm not saying that he will be as good as Messi or Ronaldo, but he is definetly the best U21 player in the world, he is English and eager to leave his club. His dribbling is outstanding, he scores and assists a lot, he is agressive and energetic, I think we should definetly go for him. He has his mistakes(finishing for example) but he could improve a lot at Chelsea.

Yes, it's possible and understandable. Austin would face the same situation though. He must be dreaming about playing for England too, I'm not sure if he wants to come here. If he wants play in France next year he should join Castle or Liverpool.

Why do we need 2-3 new strikers every fucking years? Please don't sell Rémy. Costa-Falcao-Loic would be amazing. Willian could play more behind the striker and Rémy in the right.

I don't know why people call him overrated. Just look at the numbers, he is clearly the best young player in Europe. The 20 year old Cristiano Ronaldo was just like him.

Grealish enjoying his holiday http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10265~4794710,00.html

There are dozens of players that are better than Willy in attack. Mata and De Bruyne are clearly better attackers, but Mourinho prefers hard workers with three lungs.

#TeamKevin

Coventry also:

Too bad Mexico won't play this year. They should be a part of Copa America.

Why not? He is turning 30 soon, Chelsea might be his last chance to play for a European top club. He has only played 8 Champions League matches, he probably wants to prove his class. He can definetly earn buckets of money in Qatar/US/Australia/whatever.

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/21476/9878613/danny-ings-why-do-liverpool-have-to-pay-a-fee-for-the-burnley-striker

Falcao is not even in

On the 4th of July, but Colombia might finish it earlier.

If true: good luck for Atleti to buy him back, it won't be cheap. One week ago he didn't look that unhappy. Also, he wouldn't have a chance to win anything at Atleti, why would he go back?

Assisted a goal then got injured in the 27th minute. It was his last match in this loan spell, I wonder what's next for him.

Well, according to Sky there are several other clubs.

Falcao has been on his way to Chelsea for 2009. Sign him already and get over it because I'm sick of the constant rumours.

That's why we love him

Good point. True, but we have Costa and Rémy, I don't think we should buy a 32 million pound striker.