Fernando

He says yeah a lot. lol

I think he might get in trouble. You can just see it coming. It would be amazing if he doesn't get a silly red card this whole season.

My word!

Why hasn't the game started in Chelsea TV? Are they behind or something?

As a super sub. So what about capital one, fa cup, when a striker gets a red card. And truly I'm I the only that feels like Costa might get a red card here and there? Hence Torres is the second men till DD gets into rhythm. And that might take a couple of months.

DD not getting ahead of Torres for a while. He needs to regain match fitness. Took a lot for Eto'o and he was a bit younger. So as it stands he's our second striker....

I was confused by this friendly because of the both teams playing back to back. But as always Talkchelsea staff giving the right info. Thanks guy. :tophat:

Because he's going on a 6 month loan. We did not sell him like we sold Mata. Selling a legend to a direct rival now that would be preposterous. It was best decided that Lampard should go, because he still want to remain competitive and at Chelsea we have other players that will take his spot and can't promise him first team. So he move to MLS to play regular, at City he will not play regular....well we will have to see about that.

Don't think Zola would have even made it with Mourinho at helm giving that Zola was a similar type of player in the style of Mata.

Weak mentality. Don't want such people at this club.

Yeah I'm definitely excited to see how they fare. They might be this new season what Liverpool was last season, but not for the tittle just top 4 contenders. Expect Liverpool to fall apart without Suarez. I do expect Arsenal to make it as always. So that battle for 4th spot will go between those of Liverpool, Tottenham and United. Everton won't be as good as last season I think.

Was reading Barcelona comments on Suarez supposed Bite clause. lol that's so funny. That there's no such thing and what was very interesting is what he said about Suarez: "We didn't rethink the decision (to sign him) and we told Luis after the bite. He knows he did wrong. "He apologized. That's very important for us." It's very good to hear that Barcelona see this as a wrong thing and that Suarez had to admit. That's always the step in going to help an indiviual for his mistake not act like his the victim. Like it has happened at Liverpool and many Uruguayans players and people.

If I'm not mistaken most people case for Mikel is to be a back up not a starter. We all know Matic is the best we got. But after him our back up was Ramires, Van Ginkel, Mikel and Romeu. So then we boil down to the other 3's since Ramires seems an untouchable for Mourinho... Out of these of Van Ginkel, Mikel and Romeu who is more apt to come and help us set up shop in an important fixture? Mikel seems like the guy to me. Hence why Mourinho and the club did the right thing in loaning Romeu out and keeping Mikel.

Your the epitome of a knee jerk reaction fan. I remember you calling Mourinho last year a traitor for being linked to the United job....

If I'm not mistaken wasn't the sponsorship deal of psg cut in half cause it was way out of the market? I'm not sure what city was but it was a normal figure compare to psg. So at least we know that uefa do look into this. As per buying other clubs in other countries is completely legit and actually smart in itself. Can't fault them for that when they have not break any rules.

They think that because Barcelona and United had a golden generation everyone should have it. But hey if it was that easy then why United has not had another one since class of 92? Why they must spend a lot of money now? Same goes for Barcelona, why they have to spend a lot of money on Suarez? Those are very unique cases where you get like 3 or 4 amazing players coming all at once. Cause realistically a youth coming from the club falls more in the ratio of 10 to 1. Is that low and rare to have a product from your youth come and be into the first 11. *This is mainly for a top club though. For a smaller club like Everton, Southampton, A. Villa and such is different.

I don't feel bad about the sell of Lukaku and Mata. I think they was good business and Mourinho had his input there. However I think Sturridge was a bit different. I think Mourinho might have kept him. It sucks he was sold one season before Mourinho came. Cause who doesn't miss watching his little dance?

He drop Ricardo, Lampard, Essien, cole and much more.

My only question is, if Mourinho is so ruthless then why he keeps playing Torres? Why doesn't he drop him like he did with Casillas? Send him to the reserves like with malouda.

We all know he sucks ass. But if Mourinho keeps using him then he better not say shit about having no striker come new season as it will be his fault. He should be giving the Malouda treatment simple as that. We should not be trying to play him in pre-season, it's a waste of time as that time can be use to up the conditions of other players.

Because of your awesome post Henrique I'm like:

Please put the quotes. Thank you.

So he held the club to ransom? Sounds like a Rooney case to me. [emoji57]

Wow some people here just crazy I tell you. No matter what Lampard does or goes he will always be a legend. And one day he will come back to the club as whatever he wants.

Been reading some articles about our policy with youths. Seems like a lot of butt hurts out there that we are doing such a good business.