Everything posted by Fernando
-
So basically your concern is that the USA is run by Republicans? But the chance of geo-political escalation is there? How so since you and I agree that at this moment the biggest threat which is Russia, Trump will allow to dominate Ukraine. Basically put an end to that war. Now we have to see what he will do with Israel at this time. Maybe push for the state solution? The issue will be Iran what he will do....I think nothing. Because Iran is ally of Russia and since Russia is going to continue to get what they want no one will touch them, not even Trump. Geo economic, I thought we was good with Trump? And oil was cheaper under him?
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yes because it is put like its the end of the world. Which I don't see that. Now Trump being Trump that's another thing. He is very arrogant and always wants his way. Hence why he tend to fire many people that work from him like we saw in the Apprentice.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I would like your opinion on what you see, not much articles. A Trump win and a Harris win. So these are my concerns. In the US housing is very bad and that is because lack of building homes. What they plan to do with this? Incentivize builders $$$$ I'm in favor of LGTBQ having their rights as everyone should have a free choice, but I don't agree is the indoctrination of kids in school about all this. As well if they want to marry they are free to chose what they want, just don't put the church to be obliged to do it if they don't want to do it. Go to City Hall or something like that. Ukraine not much will change unless people send troops over there. North Korea already sending troops and if the world don't send nothing they are bunch of cowards. All they do is talk and nothing more. So either take a direct stance or give up. All this money sending is not enough unless you step in and send troops. Immigration, make a pathway for DACA to get their legal status. Those DACA people that are doing right, paying everything, being good to the country etc etc. Likewise all these TPS, I feel like there should be a max time and then evaluate for them to get permanent status or deport. As there are many good working people that came through while other not so good. Maybe a decade of TPS and then weed out all the criminals and give the hard working people a legal status as they been good to the country. Reform the welfare system. What I mean by that is food stamp, section 8 and what not. I know from experience people abuse these systems, like living in low rent control housing and gaming the system. And last I'm all in favor of helping with the world as far as emission. Help with better infrastructure for more electric cars. As well roll back the mandate of all EV by 2030 Unless infrastructure improves, as we are not there yet. Favor more hybrids and Plug in hybrids, In fact give more incentives for buying Plug in hybrids as that is the bridge from ICE to full EV. Better incentives will push more Plug in Hybrids out there then ICE vehicle and that will be much better for emissions.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
January 6 was the people that did that not Trump. But I get it, the influence he had on these people was big..... Yes I feel the same with Ukraine, Trump will help accelerate that conflict to a finish. And red flags I see it, but I still don't fathom what big end of the world catastrophe he will bring? More likely he gets killed half way then anything else. Now what will be the outcome of a Harris win?
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well let me ask you how big of an impact Trump will have to the USA and the world? Because if I'm not mistaken one time you put him worse then Hitler in regards to his impact and I thought you was exaggerating. But I will like to hear your view on what you expect with another trump term. I for once continue to hold my posture that if he gets elected someone will kill him halfway.... That being said it's 2024 and the world did not end after his first term. I don't feel anything big will happen as well that will bring us to the end of the world with him. In fact I'm surprised about this news: Kim Jong Un to send Putin 12,000 soldiers, South Korea says; U.S. warns they'll be 'fair game' https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/north-korean-troops-russia-ukraine-fair-game-us-putin-rcna176989 Sending troop from another country is the start of something bigger if anyone decides to do something. Which I don't see it with trump nor anyone else in Europe as they are scare of Russia. But likewise let me know what you think a term with Harris will be do to the USA and the world.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks for this, not needed but good to know. Based on this article it appears that Netanyahu and his team does not want a two state solution. So if that is true a two state solution will never happen under him, but he is human. One day he will die and someone else will take his place. The two state solution will happen in the future. This sounds a lot of like Obama doing the deal with Iran and them getting money.....Besides the interest they hope peace will happen. This is good and bad. Good that lets economy flow into Gaza, but the problem is what happen last year. If they are not for peace they will eventually turn their back against you. We can try our best to help people, improve their economy, but if hatred is deep in them a long lasting peace will never happen. A new government increase these work permit in hope to "help" the Gaza people. A sort of convenience because from this it seems they want to maintain some sort of peace. But yeah Qatari giving money...... Again this is the same strategy USA is doing with Iran. One day it will backfire against us as well. And why? for USA is because we want peace, but the other side hatred is there and they will wait for the right moment to attack, as happen here. With Israel I see two things based on this article, 1 the desire not to let a two state solution happen and 2 to try to have some sort of peace. Which backfire on them. I feel like after Israel finish with their wars Netanyahu will eventually be question by their own government. He will have to face the consequences.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Analysis by who? A conspiracy theory that hates USA and Israel. That analysis does not hold water in El Salvador. I don't see the baking systemic interlocks there? Or say Ecuador, I don't see baking systemic interlock there. What about Haiti?
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Israel funded Hamas? So your saying that the rockets they threw on October last year was all funded by Israel? Because as far as I'm aware is by Qatar. And another thing if Gaza at this moment is dying of food and all that stuff, how come Hamas has not died of this? Where they getting their food? Unless they are stealing the Palestinian aid. One year and Hamas still alive and fighting. Insane help they are getting if you ask me.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
In general you will have this with many countries. It's just convenience. But the idea that the jews are behind every wrong in the world is just dumb. No nation, ethnicity is enough to control the world. As bad as Iran is, they have their hand in the middle east, but not the entire world. As bas as Russia is, they have their hand in certain parts of the middle east and in Venezuela but not the whole world. No one group or nation can control the whole world. USA is a dominance but not to that extent where every little crime in the world is their causing. In Ecuador, USA nor Israel have any hand to all the crime that is happening there. Is just organize crime that stems from drug cartel, which in turn because of money and power. Not to mention the mass corruption that has happen in Ecuador and many other countries like in the middle east, Africa and all over the world. But a small group to control the whole world like Zionism, please.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
It's just conspiracy theory. Your statement says this: Endless wars, endless debt (at all levels from personal up to commercial, from municipal, up to state/provincial levels, from national up to supranational) endless 'strategies of tensions' at all levels, from socio-cultural, socio-economic, up to military at massive trans continental levels. Also the use of systemic banking control to weaken all resistance and put the boot-heels to the so-called middle-class of the West and other parts of the world (think austerity regimes and IMF/World Bank crisis capitalism and state economic dis-empowerment.) who are the natural bulwarks against the entire systemic control. That is just conspiracy theory.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
This sounds plain conspiracy theory. Like Israel and USA it at fault for all the issues in the world. In Mexico with the cartel, in El Salvador with the murder capital of the world until one men step in (Dislike by the UN it seems because he goes against them), the crazy violence in Ecuador, the ethnic cleansing in Sudan. All western democracy fault.....right. Conspiracy theory galore.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well based on your charts they had it and they are the only culture from that time that is still alive today. All other cultures from that time are extinct. Assimilated into modern culture. That being said it was funded with the help of the USA and UN after WW2 when Hitler decided that the final solution was to exterminate the Jews. An insane thing when the Jews where not even a nation, how a powerful dictator decided that the jews extermination was the solution..... And Yes I would tell you that is spiritual influence but you wouldn't believe that. So for the non religious view then there's no other reason to explain the madness of Hitler in taking it out against the Jews other then he was crazy.... But yeah that was the context of modern Israel being founded.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
How so? When it was the UN that approved this. But if not, just like everything else let's also blame USA for all the woeful decisions of the past two centuries. Do you even bother to ask why? Why USA and the UN allow Israel to become a nation? Especially after being dispersed for nearly 2,000 years....something amazing, miraculous if you might see it that way as no such thing ever happen in the history of mankind. People when they get expelled from their land their culture goes extinct because of assimilation. Never happen with the Jews, quite remarkable. It's called archeology my friend. If you want to negate that, then that's all together something else.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I think they will buy Liverpool since with us Todd and company can't sell for a few more years.
-
They will do it eventually, but it will not resolved anything. The desire for revenge and hatred of the Jew will always be there. How do you explain a Nazi leader decided that the final solution was to get rid of Jews? There is a fascination with blaming everything under the sun on the Jews. So yes you will get the two state solution but it will never get rid of the problem.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
So basically, if they "end the genocide" the bloodshed will never end, because of the revenge attack you mentioned and then we go back to the same loop. This is a never ending cycle, hence long lasting peace will never be achievable. Because you can try to make a two state solution or even one state solution, but as you just alluded revenge will always be there. This reminds me of the TV series that air many years ago, Battlestar Galactica. A cycle of never ending bloodshed. Humanity is broken, and unless a divine power intervenes we will never solve this cycle of bloodshed.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Third Arab-Israeli war. Like I been saying for a while, many of these arabs country hate Israel and want them to be drowned into the sea. Israel has defended themselves and because of that won land. First Arab war again these are always the Arab countries that want to destroy Israel. Yes this I don't agree with, land grab because they want it. What I do agree if is these countries attack them and they go an attack them and decided to get the land then yes, because it's war. Now the conspiracy will say, Israel provoke these wars so they can have a legitime reason to attack and get the war. Well that is something else, and it's all conspiracy like the 911 conspiracy. In the end my point still stand, other then certifying 100% that this conspiracy is true Israel is just defending themselves. They got their land after multiple wars with Arab nations and the world is not happy about that.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
So in the end it's okay for terrorist organization to do what they do and Israel not be able to defend themselves? And like I said Israel got that land after a war that they where provoked. So I don't share the same point view as you with Illegal, and all that stuff.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
This is different then Israel being attack. One went ahead because they wanted like Russia did with Crimea. And this one Israel was provoked first. So total contrary. Those countries came and attack Israel first, they lost. I'm mentioning now and been following on the sides as people here don't care about it. It's irrelevant for them.... First the casualties are always the bad part of a war. And no country that retaliate will do good, look at USA when we went to war. So that's clear, now the question is WHY? Why Israel did that? Whey they bombed Syria? Because they felt like or because they was provoked. I keep going back to this same, who provoked first what? Israel is leaving peacefully in their country and they get rockets send over from those places. So anyone in their right mind will attack. This is something that gets lost and no mention because again is much easier to blame Israel for everything. And not going to comment on the Torah, you guys taking things out of context.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
? who is grabbing what? Are those lands that they won after they went to war? And they even have giving some back because of International pressure when they shouldn't have done that since they won those wars. So based on this for you it's okay to have terrorist cells that want to wipe out Israel and constantly sending rocket to them? And again Israel invaded? That is the narrative you want to bring, but I keep saying they where attack always. When they first became a nation, and the following wars the follow. They won the war and rightfully won those lands. But the last part I will not debate, yes Israel has done a lot of bad and can't defend that. The good thing is like in many western democracy when this over they will be held accountable. This is opposed to the Iran regime that do countless atrocities and no accountability. But yes it's much easier to hate Israel and the Jews because that is the narrative then go after Iran that destabilize the middle east with all the terrorist cells. Hypocrisy is what I call that. Hypocrisy at is best. Where do we see you and the rest of the protester protest about other regions where crazy stuff is happening. Anyone care to protest about what has been happening in Sudan? No, because it is no concern.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
And do you even bother to ask why? Why does it lead to that? Is it because terrorism is coming from those regions? Surely people want to live in peace but if you terrorist organization bombing you frequently you will do something eventually. What you mean by occupied people? How far you go back as to "occupied" because if we go by archeologist finding, that land belongs to Israel. So what date are you using to say "occupy" An international community are bunch of hypocrites. They blast more Israel then they do the terrorist country like Iran that is producing all these cells.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Adventures? I get that Israel in war is doing some atrociousness, but it's not because they freely wanted. These places they attack is because they have been receiving rockets thrown at them. Any country that received rocket from another country will go and attack them. In these instances is being run by terrorist organization.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
But if this is true, why has Obama not run for presidency? If it's true that you need to sit 4 years break before running again? I don't know where that info came from, but I wanted to check to see if you guys where aware of this supposedly "loop"
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Guy has fallen out of rhythm lately as he is doing a Ronaldinho. Partying and forgetting about the futbol. Such a shame.
-
I have a question if anyone can answer. I heard this from someone but I just don't believe it. It does not make senses to me. He said that if Trump wins he can do another term after because he took a 4 year break after his first presidency. That they can't do 2 terms consecutive but that if you took a break like Trump did after his presidency, in theory if he get elected he can run again for another term. Example he did his 4 years, took a break for 4 years now running for presidency and if he wins it will be his second term after a break. so 4 years plus 4 year break, plus a second term of 4 year. This person says that he would in theory run for a third term.....so 4 years plus 4 year break, plus a second term of 4 year and a potential third term of 4 years because of the break? I don't believe this guy that mentioned this but I want to confirm because of the 4 year break he had, thus no consecutive terms.
- 16,121 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: