Fernando

Men they going to hard to play against. Oh well happy not in our group 🙂

Which are the teams from Saudia Arabia? What team is Kante playing in? Are they here?

Yes I think he has improved. I much rather sell Dissasi and Chillwell at this time before him. Although I'm not sure if he is good enough to have as number one in the future, but he is more of a back up. And for a back up if we get a good amount of money for him then we should sell. If not he is good to have around.

But the food is being stolen by Hamas. How in earth Hamas still fighting if they have little food?

I agree, because I noticed in this game he gives better balance to the team as to say Sancho. Yes Sancho is nice and all, but when we need press, or defend Noni gives a better balance to the team then Sancho.

But again I go and repeat that in genocide there is no mercy. Genocide came from Hitler in having no mercy, zero on the jews. That is by the book genocide. When you show mercy then it's something else. Call it war crime if you want. And war crime will be punish after a conflict is ended.

Just because people say it does not mean anything. It was a mass of people that one Sunday was saying hosanna to Jesus and in another crucify him. People are fickle and get influence by anything. I will keep saying in a genocide you destroy and have no pity on any one. Just like Hitler did with the Jews. Israel is not doing that, they are still helping people. In genocide there is no mercy.

Should go to Italy. The probability that he does good over there is high.

Yes but I still will not trust 100 percent with buys. Not every manager should get a say 100 percent on transfer. I Loved Conte and Tuchel, but some of their buys where disastrous. Obviously his input should be considered but there's a few select of managers in history that had this say in the past but in todays modern world I don't think that no longer works.

By the way I remember we always used to start doing bad November-December time frame. This time is different.

They still need to fix the defense. They can do better then what we have.

Caicedo was wrong the criticis first yea. Cucu I was one of those. I would still sell him if we can get a good price for him and get a younger hot shot coming up.

So what is going on with the shirt sponsor. Has any one bothered to ask about this to our club recently?

Global warming is real and is causing the flash flood rains that is devastating many places. Since the ground is si dry when massive water drops it can't be absorbed as good. This is why we are having many floods lately in many parts of the world. And hurricane increasing in speed in short amount of time. All those are because of climate change.

True and what I'm saying that just like there's some bad there's also some good to that, colder regions can be habitable. But also that it will not be the end of the world. We will get warmer but eventually Mother nature will self correct and produce and ice age. But for that to take place it will take years. People will be eventually migrate to northern territory because of this global warming.

Well that could be in the cards. Then if that's true some place that was not able to be lived can be lived in like Greenland and other north parts of northern hemisphere. Sadly others will suffer as well. So that's bad but then the good to migrate northern. Greenland once truly green, scientists reveal Greenland was once truly green, according to new research which shows that the southern highlands of the country used to be home to a lush boreal forest. The work, which was partly funded by the EU's Marie Curie programme, is published in the latest edition of the journal S... Greenland was once truly green, according to new research which shows that the southern highlands of the country used to be home to a lush boreal forest. The work, which was partly funded by the EU's Marie Curie programme, is published in the latest edition of the journal Science. The scientists reached their conclusion after analysing ancient DNA from the base of an ice core taken at the Dye 3 site in southern Greenland. The samples revealed the presence at the site of trees such as alder, spruce, pine and yew as well as invertebrates such as beetles, flies, spiders, butterflies and moths. The samples were dated back to between 450,000 and 800,000 years ago, making them the oldest authenticated DNA obtained so far. 'Analysing ancient biomolecules from beneath glaciers and ice sheets is challenging due to the very low concentrations, but the information is worth the effort,' commented Dr Enrico Cappellini of the University of York, one of the authors of the paper. Knowing the environmental limits of the plants identified, the researchers believe that the average July temperatures at the time must have been over 10°C, while winter temperatures could not have been lower than -17°C. 'These findings allow us to make a more accurate environmental reconstruction of the time period from which these samples were taken, and what we've learned is that this part of the world was significantly warmer than most people thought,' commented Dr Martin Sharp of the University of Alberta. This ancient arctic forest disappeared and the land was covered in an ice sheet when temperatures fell during the subsequent ice age. However, when temperatures rose again some 116,000-130,000 years ago, the ice sheet remained in place, even though during that period, the temperature was 5°C warmer than today. 'If our data is correct, then this means that the southern Greenland ice cap is more stable than previously thought,' commented Professor Eske Willerslev of the University of Copenhagen, who lead the study. 'This may have implications for how the ice sheets respond to global warming.' However, Professor Willerslev is quick to note that this does not mean we should stop worrying about sea level rise resulting from global warming. 'We know that during the last interglacial, sea levels rose by five to six metres, but this must have come from other sources additional to the Greenland ice cap, such as Antarctic ice,' he notes. 'I would anticipate that as the Earth warms from man-made climate change, these sources would still contribute to a rise in sea levels.' https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/28003-greenland-once-truly-green-scientists-reveal#:~:text=journal S...-,Greenland was once truly green%2C according to new research which,edition of the journal Science.

And I agree with that. What I'm saying is that man made global warming pales in comparison to the record of global warming in the past. We are not at the level where green land is no longer ice like in the past.

Not a lie. Climate change in the past was more extreme then today. Why is Greenland more warmer in the past then today despite the human made climate change? Greenland once truly green, scientists reveal Greenland was once truly green, according to new research which shows that the southern highlands of the country used to be home to a lush boreal forest. The work, which was partly funded by the EU's Marie Curie programme, is published in the latest edition of the journal S... https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/28003-greenland-once-truly-green-scientists-reveal#:~:text=journal S...-,Greenland was once truly green%2C according to new research which,edition of the journal Science. https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/28003-greenland-once-truly-green-scientists-reveal#:~:text=journal S...-,Greenland was once truly green%2C according to new research which,edition of the journal Science

In the past the climate change was more intense then today. We are producing climate change but not as hard as natural events that happen in the past.

So in the end the impact of humans is real but not extreme like orbital change, super volcano and what not that produce massive climate change and ice age. We are getting hot but nowhere near what we see in the past of extreme climates.

Then he is number one priority for me. Forgot about Hincapie and anyone else, he is the one to get. Murillo is the defender we need to help improve the defense.

But according to the chart shown here it is the human fault. In the past it was the orbit. And in the past the weather was more extreme that led to ice age. We are nowhere near those levels of extreme heat to produce an ice age right now. Which tells me we can change this if something scientific is done. It's good that we are going to EV, but I'm not sure how much that will help when the plants that produce them are also using a lot of fossil fuels.

And again if the human are producing it is nowhere near as bad as the climate warming of past. Previous global warming was extreme that lead to ice age.

Climate change is real, I'm not denying. I was saying how it happen in the past and in the past we had more stronger climate change then today. Based on your article it was because of the rotation: Earth's climate has changed throughout history. Just in the last 800,000 years, there have been eight cycles of ice ages and warmer periods, with the end of the last ice age about 11,700 years ago marking the beginning of the modern climate era — and of human civilization. Most of these climate changes are attributed to very small variations in Earth’s orbit that change the amount of solar energy our planet receives. So the question is if we had that in the past right now we are not nowhere near the level of the past. Because you form lakes in the past that are big. Example on this article: These vast lakes formed approximately 14,000 years ago due to climate warming and glacial melting. https://search.app?link=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldatlas.com%2Flakes%2Fthe-great-lakes-ranked-by-size.html&utm_campaign=aga&utm_source=agsadl1%2Csh%2Fx%2Fgs%2Fm2%2F4 We had ice age and global warming. Right now we are in a trend of global warming, but this time based on your article the human fault not the orbit. Question is if we can use the model of past global warming to see how far we will go into the warming of the planet before we enter into an ice age? That is the vibe I'm getting from your article, that we will produced these types of cycles from warm to cold.

Good stuff. So in the past we did had the planet getting hot and colder, because it was part of the system right? This time is the humans fault. I take that. Then the question is if we are producing climate change then will it have the same effect in the past? As you have their in your analysis that we have had periods of ice age and global warming. Right now we are in a global warming, so can we use the previous model to see how far we will go into global warming before we reverse and enter into an ice age? Because on the analysis it seems to indicate that we had global warming and eventually ice age....