Jump to content

BlueLion.

Member
  • Posts

    38,634
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    185
  • Country

    United Kingdom

Everything posted by BlueLion.

  1. Was just about to post those exact words.
  2. Absolutely. 100% more confident ahead of tomorrow now I know we have our leader back.
  3. Well, then that means going with Cech, doesn't it? Courtois is a fabulous goalkeeper, but Cech - equally as good, if not even better - has a decade more experience under his belt. We can go around and around forever with this argument. I don't really care about Courtois, he hasn't played a single minute for us. Cech's nearly played 500 games for us, so I think people are only being fair in saying they don't want him replaced yet. Cech's done nothing wrong to be farmed off.
  4. I don't think we even bid for Rooney. I just think José wanted to ruffle some feathers. Judging on how well they've done this season, I think he succeeded. I highly doubt José ever wanted to bring in a temperamental nearly-29 year old!
  5. It's a nice thought and I love the man, but if he knocks us out the Champions League I'll be pretty pissed to be honest...
  6. I never said you did... Exactly, PSG is not short on money. So you have answered your own question as to why they'd sell him.
  7. I do. Because, let's be fair, Zlatan is top dog at PSG. Cavani may have 20 goals in 30 games this season, but he hasn't played as well as those statistics infer. Many of his performances have been lacklustre, and he certainly isn't performing as well as did for Napoli for so many years. He hasn't set the world on fire. I wouldn't say he is a failed investment by any means, but if PSG can recoup and thus reinvest in a position where they need more quality, I can't see why not.
  8. I'm blinded by compassion. He has a good game for every 20 shockers. Somehow I'd convinced myself he was decent. I'm not sure how. I'd be a brilliant hypotherapist.
  9. Luiz the person - love him, worth £100,000,000. Luiz in midfield - a bit risky, but a top footballer. Don't mind him playing there. Luiz in defence -
  10. He was poor today, but name me one player who wasn't? He was possibly the best of a sorry bunch.
  11. None of our players looked like scoring. Pantilimon probably was our best hope of scoring.
  12. We were terrible, City were excellent. We should be thankful it wasn't 3-0, 4-0, 5-0, or worse. It could quite easily have been, but thankfully Pellegrini acted mercifully with Barcelona on the horizon. If they weren't playing in midweek and thus started their best side... wow. This would have been messy.
  13. Today was the straw that has broken the camel's back, as far as I'm concerned. Lost all patience with him. I've done pretty well, eight years of backing him, but I can't convince myself any longer, sadly. Time to go.
  14. Fickle. Name one player who made anything close to an impression today. Where was Hazard, the so-called third best player in the world? Don't give me the "he was tired" bollocks. These are paid, highly trained professional athletes. I don't see how they can be tired from doing fuck all today. No-one pulled their weight. But targeting the newest member of the squad is lazy even for Chelsea supporters' standards. Embarrassed to be an admin on these forums sometimes, I really am. Some truly cretinous members on here. If you want to slag someone off, have a dig at Mikel or Ramires. They were worse than the rest, and the rest were fucking abysmal.
  15. ^ maybe, although said player on the line may have booted it away before even Cech touched it.
  16. You'd rather win the UEFA Super Cup, a glorified friendly, than the FA Cup?
  17. 2-0 reflects comparatively well on us. Could have and should have been far worse, but let's move on. The FA Cup was third on everyone's list of priorities, I think.
  18. A very sobering result. Second best, and we must do better, but not entirely disastrous. Mikel and Ramires were utterly atrocious.
  19. Manchester City totally outclassed a lethargic Chelsea to reach the quarter finals of the FA Cup at the Blues' expense. After the Blues' more than impressive victory over Manuel Pellegrini's side in the Premier League just twelve days ago, many Chelsea supporters may well have arrived at the Etihad hoping for more of the same from a side looking to bounce back from a disappointing draw against West Brom on Wednesday. But any hopes of a positive reaction were dashed when Stevan Jovetic converted a goal that City's early dominance warranted with just sixteen minutes played. That opening period, bossed by the hosts, set the tone for a disappointing display by José Mourinho's men. City looked the hungrier and fresher of the two sides - no surprise considering their midweek game against Sunderland was called off over safety concerns. With the added benefit of a much changed line-up and the extra few days rest that fixture postponement resulted in, the home side demonstrated the greater endeavour and were worthy winners - the result confirmed when Samir Nasri converted from close range on 67 minutes. David Silva was in an offside position in the build-up to the goal, but Chelsea's turgid performance did not deserve any less. True, Nasri's goal settled the game, but the result seemed obvious following such a sloppy, insipid start by a jaded-looking Chelsea side. Eden Hazard, of whom so much is expected every game - not least because of his wonderful hat-trick against Newcastle last weekend - was man-marked into anonymity, whilst the usually magnificent Willian was equally as quiet. Samuel Eto'o, normally so industrious up front, was on the periphery of proceedings to such an extent he was replaced by new signing Mohamed Salah at half-time. Chelsea were absolutely outclassed by their hosts, but that is of little surprise considering how poorly they played. What a difference a week or two makes - just two weeks after their magnificent win over City in the corresponding Premier League fixture, the Blues were dire, with midfield duo Ramires and John Mikel Obi particularly poor. Even Petr Cech, usually so confident, looked a shade of himself. With 14 minutes played, the first true effort of note was spilled by the Czech goalkeeper as Yaya Toure let fly. The Blues stood off, and with Jovetic quickest to react, the Montenegrin international clipped the bar as he looked to punish Cech's lethargy. With their stand-in skipper so sloppy, the tone was set for the Chelsea performance in general, and Jovetic's opening strike mere moments later was no more than the Blues' poor showing - and, of course, a sprightly start from their opponents - deserved. If the travelling contingent of 6,000 from West London had hoped that goal would lead to the players pulling their finger out, they could not have been more misplaced in their faith. Seemingly punch-drunk, the Blues were terrible with their passing and City's considerable pressing prevented their flair players from making anything close to an impression. So bad were Chelsea that they failed to register a shot on target, with Cesar Azpilicueta's ridiculous 30-yard strike (that sailed about twenty feet over the bar) embarrassingly stands as the best the Blues could conjure. By that time their sluggishness had already been punished by an exquisitely worked second for City, with Nasri - so often the bane of Chelsea - converting from Silva's pull-back. Silva was marginally offside, but frankly, based on their impressive performance, City deserved such a stroke of fortune. It might have been worse had the linesman been equally lenient as the game petered out, but this time the official deemed Joleon Lescott offside when he poked home following an excellent Petr Cech save. That save, and subsequent decision, at least kept a modicum of respectability to the scoreline, but the painful truth is that Chelsea were once again sub-par and must significantly up their game ahead of testing matches against Everton and Galatasaray on the immediate horizon.
×
×
  • Create New...