BlueLion.

You have four posts since 2012 and you're flogging a supposedly match-worn shirt anonymously. Not at all suspicious.

Name: bushman Reason: Abusive Behaviour Punishment: Content moderated permanentlyAbility to create content removed permanently.Suspended permanently Also move to Banned

Lad.

FFS.

You can get it from most supermarkets and chemists.

To get my hair to look like this: I use this: It's a paste. Apply to damp, not wet, hair, massage in and style for the desired look. Dry using either a towel (dab away, and then restyle the stretched but dry follicle, which will set it in the desired direction) or using a hairdryer, combing at the same time. You may need to apply hairspray to the root of the fringe to hold everything in place. Though mine actually looks like this now (fed up with having to style it every day):

IF someone comes in and offers £10m+ for the guy, we should sell. We'd have actually made a profit on the bloke. However I wouldn't be adversed to seeing him stay as 2nd/3rd choice striker. He is a decent "plan B" option should we need to play long-ball when chasing a game.

Case in point. I won't waste my time debating with you. You have your opinion and I have mine, or am I not allowed to have mine because I disagree with you? I look at the fact Spurs signed Vertonghen for £10 million and that we spent £21 million on Luiz and can do nothing more than sigh. Also, you seem to be confusing "facts" with your opinion. Good day to you.

I understand there is an element of surprise and he is let down by how easily Marcelo is allowed to roam between a number of defenders, but as you say, if he was on his toes he takes three-four sidesteps and can either perform the k-barrier save or a collapse.

The goal was certainly not a howler, but it was a mistake nonetheless. It was the wrong save selection from Courtois. I am an FA accredited goalkeeper coach looking to begin my UEFA licences, and if any of my academy players attempted to make a low diving step save for that sort of shot, I'd make them sit out for the rest of the session. There was absolutely no footwork involved in the execution of the save, which meant he couldn't get down quick enough. It should have been a simple case of a few sidesteps and a low collapse, rather than a step save. The ball was hit too firmly and too close to his body for his arm to get down quickly enough with the type of save he tried to pull off.

No apology necessary, and I have taken absolutely no offensive from either your post or from Barbara's! I'm made of far sterner stuff than that! To me, saying "Bushman level" is very disrespectful to Bushman himself, who, despite taking the role of devil's advocate to the most extreme level, is capable of some very good posts. I'd rep you ten times over if I could. Wholeheartedly agree. No-one is saying Luiz is a bad footballer. The argument is he too inconsistent, and thus too unreliable to be a first-choice centre back for Chelsea FC. Great post son.

Cech - Schwarzer - Blackman, based on the logic that I have a gut feeling Atletico will demand a fourth loan deal for Courtois as part of any Costa deal.

The Bushman reference is equally ignorant/rude IMO.

You're the one being dismissive of other people's opinions because they don't adhere to your own narrow-minded view of the world. You believe that because you predicted we'd somehow win the UCL in 2012 that your word is gospel, and anyone who challenges your opinion is incorrect. So remind me who's being "blind and ignorant"? Why, because it's obscenely ignorant? I must have missed the memo that said all people who don't condone to the majority view are idiots. I have never once slagged off Luiz as a player. That's what is frustrating about him, he has all the technical ability in the world, but he's a walking brainfart of a defender.

Great post, TOPTB. Glad someone else appreciates the brilliant business. Too many people get sentimental to the person that each player is, rather than the player's actual ability. People like Mata and Luiz are technically wonderful players, but they are square pegs for the round holes of Mourinho's Chelsea. If people want to pay ridiculous money for bit-part/surplus to requirements players, be my guest.

Disagree all you like, doesn't bother me in the slightest. Each to their own. David Luiz is a defensive liability. I'm sure he will make a brilliant defender in Ligue Un, but he's not cut out to do it in the Premier League. Which amazes me. It really does. He has all the technical ability in the world, but Gary Neville as absolutely right, in my humble opinion, to say it's like he's being controlled by a kid on his Playstation. He's a brainfart of a defender. I like him a lot in midfield, but Mourinho obviously wants someone who is a little more positionally disciplined. Just my personal opinion. I prefer "safe" or "typical English defenders" like Terry and Cahill. Nowhere near the same technical level - though both are very talented with the ball - but more sound defensively.

Absolutely. Pathetic attitude.

We've sold Mata, Luiz and de Bruyne for approximately £95m. Replaced them with Matic, Salah and Costa for approximately £65m. Unbelievable business.

He's not a midfielder and as a defender he's more often than not useless, in my opinion. If Cahill is worth £9 million then no, I don't think Luiz is worth even £15 million.

Glad he's going, to be honest. Surplus to requirements, and if someone is stupid to offer THAT amount of money for someone who isn't good enough to be our first-choice centre-back or an adequate enough option in midfield (square peg, round hole...), then you take the money and run. Cheers PSG, happy to do business. David Luiz the MAN is worth £50 million. As a player he's not worth a quarter of that, in my honest opinion. Give me a "safe" option, i.e. Cahill, any day of the week.

He's sold and replaced two players surplus to requirements - for nearly £80 million - with one of the world's best holding midfielders and a promising utility player, making a £50 million profit in the process which will be spent on reinforcing areas we need to strengthen. I'd say he's done a damned good job,

£50 million? Where do I sign? Sorry Luiz, but for that amount of money, I'll drive the ferry.

1. If your Uncle Jack helped you off an elephant, would you help your Uncle Jack off an elephant? 2. As a result of the above statement, do you appreciate appropriate capitalisation in sentences?