Jump to content

Amblève.

Member
  • Posts

    5,165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1
  • Country

    Austria

Everything posted by Amblève.

  1. If he really signs with us, what happens to Torres/Ba? That's the only question I have.
  2. KPB is one of the last remaining leaders out there. An absolute beast of a player, however, I don't see Chelsea needing him and him being suited for this Chelsea squad.
  3. That's not what @bleed_blue said.
  4. Show me one of them and their exact quotes where they stated what you're claiming.
  5. Bingo. Ramires at least can shut down that right flank though.
  6. Cunt. Not even worth cleaning Lampard's boots.
  7. What the hell's wrong with you?! Did I knock your cat down or something?
  8. Lewandowski isn't Schürrle and vice versa. I've watched a lot of Schürrles games, actually, and he was getting pushed off the ball too often for my liking to be called "strong". Btw, blame it on the guy who invented that term. As I already said above, judging from the games he's given me the impression that he lacks the strenght to hold its own at times. And again, Schürrle is not Lewandowski or whatsoever. Might as well bring up that Boateng physically overrun Lewandowski completely, and that (considering that Boateng is one of the worst defenders at making use of body strenght in tackles) is worrying, isn't it? Btw, are you the same person or brothers or friends or lovers or whatever?!
  9. This forum has certain rules and if you're going to post like DA BIG BOSS INDA HOUSE I'll friggin' tell you to quit it. Calling other people "morons" is not gonna make you cooler nor is it gonna support your point either. Basically, even Courois can play as a striker, or any other player for that matter, but that doesn't mean they're suited for that role. As I already posted twice in this thread Schürrle doesn't possess the required abilities to be effective as a striker. But as you don't even seem to be about to post why he can play there and instead insist that he is a striker without giving any reasons I doubt I can expect a proper answer, can I? Second striker? Not in this Chelsea squad. Such a role doesn't exist here, and no, Mata is not a second striker. He's having a "free role" (or whatever you wanna call it) Body weight =/= muscles, strenght
  10. Get your tone right when you post. Anyway, I'll be the good dude and respond to you in a appropriate manner. Yes, Schürrle is a winger (an "inverted winger"). If you haven't watched any of his games I recommend you to do so (Last season, out of 39 games he played 36 ones on the left wing...). To be a striker he'd need to gain muscles en masse, learn how to play with his back to the net, learn how to move better without the ball (SPACING), polish his finishing, be heading the ball better etc. etc. etc.
  11. "Good long distance shot" and "work rate" are definitely not the things that should come to mind first when you talk about a winger you wanna buy for 20m...
  12. We simply won't sell a player like Luiz because of the prestige we as Chelsea have. No team that wants to contend for every trophy sells its CB numero uno to a direct rival. That's not what big clubs do.
  13. Actually, he is. His whole system during his spell at Liverpool was based on counters, hence Torres blossomed there.
  14. One can simply hope we're not gonna settle for signing a "08/15-Spieler" (as we call an average footballer in German) for ~20m.
  15. Lol, if just half of the players being linked with Chelsea and Mourinho would come we'd have 40 players on the roster
×
×
  • Create New...