didierforever

anything over 30mil is bullshit. if we want to spend 40mil, then spend it on koke.

we cant have a squad of matics and cescs and hazards. rambo is a "must have as a squad player" for various reasons.

how can jara or whoever that cunt was not be banned. is not it sexually offending another player?

i watch ATM a lot and he is simply brilliant. he definitely has discipline problems but i would take him in a heartbeat for our RW (specially if it means willian as a CAM).

LOL. if it was not for arsenal buying cech and most of us wanting some blood in return, no one would even be talking about this transfer.

you know the news is fake when it has a player swap included in it. there are like 1 or 2 player swap transfers done in the whole transfer window. yet chelsea itself is looking to do the followin: luis - alderwereld greizemann-salah pogba - oscar pogba - cuadrado pogba - salah pogba - oscar+cuadrado+salah. in short, i call bullshit!!! also, greizemann is not a RW

hahhaha... add moses and marin too as a good will gesture.

the impact of fifa is so apparent these days.

11 mil from PSG is good money, 11mil from arsenal is not.

between arsenal and psg, which is fair enough since its in england and makes sense for him. but not for such a price. like i said, i have a hunch that united will come into the race. selling cech to united for 10-11 mil wont hurt half as bad as selling them to those cunts.

there is psg. if we are patient, i have a good hunch that even united will join the race when RM buy de gea and spurs are asking 25mil for lloris. 11mil to arsenal for one of the best GKs in the world is a steal.

still cant believe the price involved. 11 mil for a top5 GK in the world. bullshit!!!

happy bday SFL!!!

Its arsenal.. fucking arsenal.. the cunts that I hate with a passion.. But on the other hand its cech. I am soory but we can't expect a world class, top 5 if not top 3 GK to play cup games... also he is a legend, he has given everything he could.. he has deserved to go whereever he chooses to go.. But I like what jose is doing.. 10mil for a world class kepper is nothing specially when to a rival.. get one of their players like ox or make them buy for something OTT

I was talking in terms of transfer values cos that is generally what is talked about in football fans. Falcao was a massive hit on united's FFP books but 3-4 years down the road, people would simply look at the net spend, and that won't include falcao or just include his 6mil loan fee and not his 13mil wages

bamford is 21, he will be 22 next season, and barely begining his career. lukaku was an idiot who shot himself in the foot. now he can rot in everton's mediocrity. i myself wanted bamford to be a part of the squad but realistically, if costa got injured towards the end of the season, would you be completely satisfied and happy having remy start and only bamford on the bench in a CL semi. i honestly would be shit scared. bamford still has a long way to go and i hope he gets a good PL loan spell. this is nothing but an year long loan which is way better than buying some one for 25+ million and blocking bamford's path in the long run.

both of which are false? so you can guarantee me that no matter what falcao cant be a good 2nd striker or hit good form? well, we will definitely come back to that. so we can extrapolate? great, then fuck costa and lets make remy our no.1 striker cos he has the better return. where have i dimished remy's return? where have i said that remy should not be here. why are you trying to put words into my mouth. read what i wrote to choulo or to stats. remy is a MUST for next season, as a 2nd/3rd striker and RW/LW. again, being disrespectful to remy, what exactly are you reading? is it the fact that remy is no better than a 2nd striker or good enough for squad rotation, is thats whats making you hallucinate and put words into other people's mouths? lololol, another torres comparision.. cos life just is so straight forward. not even going to bother anymore.

see, i dont see the problem with this transfer. even if falcao fails, its just an year. he is not blocking the path to either bamford/solanke in the near future. he does give us the depth required. plus i feel, he will get his form back.

wow what a zinger!!! brilliant. dont you have more cribbing to do about a player who has not touched the ball yet!!!

the point is that if we dont buy a 3rd striker, remy gets to start 20-25 games of a 60 game season. 700 minutes for 7 goals is an awesome return which CAN NOT be extrapolated in the simialr way when talking about 2000 minutes that remy would definitely get if we had no other option. also, i would like to know who people think should be our 3rd striker? a youth player?bamford/solanke? so they are better than falcoa now?

"so falcao's already helping the club? i am fine with that. and since we are using awesome theories, i think by december falcao will reach his ATM form, kick ass and score 20+ goals, shitting on all the haters." what part of awesome theories did not you understand. so the same old same old shit sprouted again? not worth it.

coming from the genius who is already cribbing about falcao.

our manager says that he will do a lot of things, like not selling luiz and mata, or playing RLC or playing remy. in the end, i go with what he DOES. and what he has done it is got another striker. so what you are saying is you dont want a 3rd striker? or would you be fine with costa, remy and bamford? one of the various reasons is "injuries" and by your linear extrapolation, whats going to change that your improve that next season. i can trust falcao better cos i have watched him play and seen him even rip our defence a new asshole. how dominating he was for ATM. also, by watching both falcao and torres, i can say that the similarities end at the injuries. there playing style is different, their attitude is different, their situations are totally different. while one striker had to carry all the burden on his shoulder, the other has costa and remy to share the workload and getting the pressure off him. as is their situation concering the price tag and the expectations. while torres was supposed to be the second coming of jesus, falcao is suddenly so bad that even a loan spell which makes perfect sense from all views is supposedly going to make us "leeds united" or that he is as shit as "peter crouch". ps - DD's last season had nothing to do with this. or are u talking about the 30minutes that DD got against sunderland?

talk about making a mountain out of a molehill.

a second striker is not supposed to play 700minutes in 38 games. remy is good as a rotation option for a ST or a RW, and even cup games. but i wont trust him as our sole no.2 considering we will be playing 60 games this season and costa will play 35-40 (missing others cos of injuries and suspensions). enter FALCAO.