didierforever

hahhahaha... cuadrado was salah's replacement.. why dont we take a poll and see how many people think he was schurrle's replacement and how many think he was salah's. it ll be proved who was talking absolute utter nonsense and bullocks.. add to that "salah should have been given time" lol,, like we are some charity club..

why am i not surprised? when people have no rebuttals, they tend to do this.

yes. juan would have joined even if salah had not gone. is that even a serious question. schurrle was departing permanently. you think we just got up on 2nd feb and bought cuadrado? no. it was a known thing. as was salah's loan. which makes it obvious that all of this was premeditated (cant believe i have to explain this). at the end of the transfer window, salah was loaned out and replaced by izzy brown, who did not play a minute until the title was already decided. that was salah's exact value to the team which was equal to NOTHING.

willian is not dynamic? .. well i guess only salah is!! right? lol cuadrado was not salah's replacement. he was schurrle's replacement. get your facts right. do you know who salah's replacement was? no one.. cos thats what his value was to the team.. NOTHING.

transfer fee = 7 year amortized fee for the year04-05 1.4 05-06 1.4 06-07 0.84 signed a contract extension left fee 4.207-08 0.84 08-09 0.504 signed a contract extension left fee 2.5209-10 0.504 10-11 0.504 11-12 0.504 12-13 0.126 signed a contract extension left fee 0.50413-14 0.126 14-15 0.126 15-16 0.126 so basically its 125k of unamortized fee left.

and considering how he played when given a chance to play, i thank god that he was not given a long run. guess we would not have won the league then. simple as that. and why should we have given him an extended run? we had 4 AMs who are much better footballers than him. willian is an integral part of our system. one who provides a lot of dynamism while also covering for ivanovic. his workrate gives hazard a freer role while he himself is a handful. except for goals, his game lacks absolutely NOTHING.

oh.. so calling it as it is,a player who has been poor and useless to us,is not allowed now? what has he done that was close to constructive for us? you dont need to be special to get a fan's adoration. all you need to do is try your best, work your hardest and give everything you can for the club. thats willian for me.

so by research you think i should simply see who scored how many and make my opinion? i mean those "stats" say everything to us, dont they? they tell us that salah scored a useless goal against arsenal when we were 4/5-0 up. those stats show that willian put in an awesome performance against city and did an awesome job on yaya. those stats reflect that willian was one of our best players in the second half of the season? i have already done my research, which mainly is to watch every chelsea match. i dont have anything against salah. i support chelsea and want whats best for chelsea. it may be a co-incidence that salah joined chelsea on 23rd jan and you joined TC on 23rd jan as well. you probably need to set your priorities right. this is a chelsea forum, not a salah forum.

coming from the poster who said that juve cant be interested in willian... hahahahah.. ... oscar is goat, right?

stats wise? seriously? he is not a hundreth of a player that willian is. he was poor. he was utter shit and useless for us.

i did. i counted all the matches he played for us. do you remember the match against shrewbury? the number of times he looked so out of his depth playing for us? like i said to the troll gilvorak, he fits the serie A profile. a player for midtable team. cant wait him to be in ex blues.

lol @ this troll for calling oscar a "goat".. oh well that list is for another day. so now serie a is the bestest league in the world? a poor league with no fight or quality. well, seems perfect for salah.

oh my god!!! one match!!! well, i guess ji sun park must the best ever, right? definitely clueless...

what a waste!!! any idea of the price.

cos only player worth being interested is in oscar!!!

hmmm.. so i guess that makes downing a brilliant talent... i am sorry if i dont see the swiss league or the italian league, cos you know simply not worth the time. but when i DID see him, i remember him playing so "excellently" against strawberry. just won my heart over.

come on!!! get in... EL TIGRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

oh great!!! a useless, no good player, causing us this much trouble.

cech - amortized fee = 0 wages = 5.2 (according to wagnh) transfer value = 10mil total = -4.8mil begovic - amortized fee = 8/5 = 1.6mil wages = 70k~ 3.5mil (his current is 35k so even if we say that he gets a 100% hike, http://sportsearning.com/2013/02/21/asmir-begovic-salary-or-income/) total = 5.1mil so the 2nd GK spot would cost us a mere 0.3mil (if that, i have taken cech's transfer fee to be only 10mil, so actually we might be earning some). for the next year, begovic will cost us 5.1mil, which is same as what cech cost us on the books. and like you said, his ability is not even in question. for those 15 games, maybe (25-30 in case courtois) gets injured, we are in very safe hands.

bayern - neuer, reina RM - casillas, navas barca - bravo, stegen even ATM - moya, oblak. its about that uncertainity of an injury. for an outfield player, you can play someone out of position (like zouma for matic), but a good team needs 1 WC GK and another good GK. i hope no one has forgotten ross trollbull and hilarious.

?

hmmm.. you seem to have a very weird sense of humor in that case.

so wanting our squad to be better is pressing the panic button? or that we think relegation is close by? talk about over-reaction and exageration.

dude, your initial point was that buying turan and vidal was overkill. that was the main point of debate. i have given my point of view in saying exactly why its not overkill. infact thats just good squad strength. 8 good players (midfielders that too) for 5 spots along with 2 19 years old (RLC and traore) is just very much viable for 60 odd matches. the point is "realistically" we are not even looking to buy a CM that is not pogba. we have the resources and should definitely be looking to improve ourselves by getting players like vidal.

we are simply going in circles now. gustavo - wolfsburg dont need to sell. one of the financially well to do clubs kondogbia - just moved to inter allan - napoli. if we are talking about "realistic" how are any of them realistic? song is not an upgrade on mikel. which is this new CM that you want. i honestly dont see any options out there. maybe bastian if he decides to leave bayern. sometimes we need to go OTT to improve the squad and go that extra mile, thats how you win a CL and be the best in the world. as for the squad cover point, what i had meant was, again given the previous situation, or any injury to matic/cesc, the supposed "cover" is very very lacking in quality. the numbers might be the same, but it is not enough "cover".