didierforever

DD was brought in to replace lukaku. falcao has been brought in to replace DD, not remy. plus we had salah and schurrle last season, this season we have a very questionable cuadrado as our only winger option except for the main 3(hazard-oscar-willian), remy will get plenty of oppurtunities to play.

LOLOLOl... dude, if u cant uderstand a joke that stats said or that i said, then why even put your nose into that conversation?

fair enough. remy can. i am not saying he cant. infact i am pretty sure, i have said that he is a must for next season.

did i say easy? or are you you blinded by the falcao hate that you cant understand simple english now? its EASIER to score 7 goals in 700 minutes than 20 goals in 2000minutes. not rocket science. oh yes, the best argument is that since it happened to a guy named torres, all strikers who have had a knee injury will go down the same path.

so falcao's already helping the club? i am fine with that. and since we are using awesome theories, i think by december falcao will reach his ATM form, kick ass and score 20+ goals, shitting on all the haters.

@choulo, so all this fuck off and shit is fine cos he is agreeing with you? should i reply in kind to this SOB!!

how was kdb for us? downright shit!!! i ll judge him by that and not by some midlevel bundesliga team. oscar is getting another year (apparently), lets see where that ends up. but i can definitely see why jose did what he did with falcao. if costa is injured, i wont want remy to lead our line in a CL semi final against bayern/rm/barca. one poor season of falcao does not equate him to becoming a torres. people need to come of the torres generalization.

costa had an awesome minutes/goal ratio until he lost his purple patch and then had a lean patch. its easier to score 7 goals in 700 minutes than 20 goals in 2000 minutes. again, remy was very good, and should be with us next season, but just having costa and remy for the whole season with bamford would have been stupid. how many times did remy/DD start and we looked like we had no bite. clutching at straws.. our manager thinks almost the same thing. well, i guess i am clutching at straws...

thats right, remy was the bestest back up striker in the whole of the universe. i mean he scored a whole of 7 goals and our manager trusted him so much that he chose a 37 year old DD before remy. i like remy, i want him to be here for the next season, but he is nowhere near costa or falcao. hibernating in france? you mean in the team that went beyond us in CL last season, scoring 13 goals in 22 games? i mean i guess, rvp was awesome when he almost single handedly won united their 20th league title, so all assumptions mean that he will be even better next season, right? thank god, real life and our manager's mind does not work in such a linear fashion. he can actually see that form can be gained back and that the class is still there.

fair enough. love the heading though Radamel Falcao looks less of a gamble for Chelsea the more you look at it

its not just guardian. a lot of sources have said that we will be paying half of his wages, and it makes sense. united paid 7mil for the fee, we are paying 4mil, MAKES SENSE. we play 4 competitions, we will be looking to win 4 competitions, last season, when costa was out, we looked downright poor at times. i am trying to look at it objectively. jose knows what he did last season, how tired our players looked in jan and feb itself. he would not want to make the same mistake again. even in the post season friendly, jose played remy as a RW rather than a striker, which seems fair enough to me. he will be our versatile player, can fit in whereever needed. so no, i dont think falcao has been brought to replace remy. and yes, i definitely think that we did not need a drogba like 3rd striker. we needed someone far more competitive. someone who can push costa to the perform better, falcao will do that. people think that just cos he had one poor season and just cos we had the similar thing we torres, they will go exactly the same. bullshit!!!! try being a little objective here.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/jun/16/chelsea-agree-radamel-falcao-loan-deal-monaco http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/chelsea-transfer-news-blues-take-gamble-on-radamel-falcao-but-manchester-united-misfits-wages-will-be-halved-10324742.html no where does it say that we are paying 175kpw. the normal rumored pay is half his salary, which is 260kpw. so 6.5mil per year. 10.5mil per year for falcao. someone who if he hits his form would be devastating. a very acceptable risk. now if we had replaced DD with benteke/lacazette. a fee of 25mil (atleast), wages of 100-120kpw = 5-6 mil per year. in short 10-11mil per year for the 3rd striker. hence, falcao is not costing us anything that a 3rd striker would not have cost us. moreover, he is a loan deal. he would not affect bamford's chelsea future (as much as i wanted to watch bamford in blue this season, it was never going to happen). so i think falcao makes even more sense.

this is coming from a poster who called oscar GOAT... :lol:

he did. was pretty decent last night. did not score and honestly did not even come close to scoring, but his overall play was good.

hope that list comes down to 4 with lord obi on his way out.

and i am guessing u do know how it works, right? so tell me exactly how many shirts do chelsea need to sell to recuperate the 10mil we are apparently spending on falcao this season. also tell me whats chelsea's cut in this deal since i dont think how much we will be getting. here's a little eye opener for u http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2013/9/6/4702220/no-fernando-torres-doesnt-earn-chelsea-21m-in-annual-shirt-sales. how surprising that jose and the board will be willing to take a chance on our PL and CL chances just to sell jerseys.. ohh dude, seriously stop.. DD got injured in 10-11, won us the CL 11-12.. so sssssshhhhhhhh... so your definition of a player is limited to his last year's performance. hmmmm.. maybe u can shorten it to a match or so... would make as much sense. yes, RM offloaded him and wanted a new shiny toy in james, look where that landed them. considering they won a copa del ray and CL double compared to NOTHING this season, well, i guess that does tell us something, does not it? i am bringing bale into the equation cos you are talking shit. one season does not define a player. one season did not make falcao = crouch. and thats the bloody reason that jose fucking mourinho, the best manager in the world has got him in our squad!!!! pace - related to age and injury, but how is finishing and instinct based on injuries? that is more to form and confidence. we all know how good falcao is in those departments. look at totti or toni. so basically you have nothing here. oh dear mother of god!!! so chelsea have to play both their matches against united without costa or remy. in one of the matches we play a 37 year old DD, and in the other we play a CAM-oscar as a ST. against arsenal in what could have been a very tricky match if we had lost, we played DD cos again both strikers are injured, and yet you go on and on and on about how chelsea and jose mourinho have bought falcao 1. just for his brand name, 2. for shirt sales, 3. to help cuadrado (when there are rumors that he himself might be on the way out). how difficult is it to just say, that we bought falcao cos jose feels he still has got quality. fair enough, i ll support him no matter what. and come december, i expect most of the people to be singing jose's praises about his absolute coup to buy falcao.

so let me get this straight. our board said, fuck the yokohama deal, fuck the awesome transfers that we have made like luiz for 50mil, fuck the general proze money and tv money we are getting, we want to make money off falcao. not reus, not bale not pogba but falcao. and whats even more awesome in that, jose said "you guys are right, i dont need a 3rd striker who i feel is good, even though remy and costa were injured together for a lot of matches, i too want to sell shirts"... yipeee!!! :clown: so basically, all of your arguments are based on torres... hmmm.. awesome.. lets judge everyone from torres' perspective.. i mean life IS that simple, right... ADM is a world class player.. young outperformed him.. so by your definition ADM sucks, right? bale did not just perform badly according to RM level, his performances were down right shit. only reason he got 17 goals was cos your team beats anither 7-0, you generally end up on the scoresheet. remember torres also scored 22 goals in 12-13, did not mean he was worth shit. again, midfielder needs to be more fit, an injury would ruin a midfielder's career even more than a strikers. also, how is falcao's finishing and clinicality related to his injury? LOL... you just basically said that he was in poor form, and again, forms can change quicker than people's opinion about players in today's world. so stop giving asenine arguments. again, i want you to explain to me, why would jose risk getting a loanee who apparently is done and dusted and out of it over options like benteke, lacazette. please go on and tell me

3mil profit!!! good enough.. bye bye..

did not young displace ADM for like half a season? well, i guess only goals and not performances matter. kane/sanchez/aguero were better than hazard. so again, 1 year defines a player.. hmmm.. thank god, the real world does not work that way. but i mean, even jose thinks like that. thats the only reason he would have bought falcao. what other reason could it be? u tell me. why would jose want falcao? is it cos he is still a very good player and jose knows exactly how good he is and that he can get that out of him. cos there is a saying "form is temporary, class is permanent". LOOLOLOLOL... another one who believes in the t-shirt stories.. i guess roman would have said to the board "listen guys, i am going bankrupt, so want to sell more shirts" :clown: :clown: is not bastian 30? oh well... :clown: :clown: :clown: i guess by the end of the season, u ll wish that u had kept your mouth shut.

no, what i am telling you is that comparing falcao to crouch is as idiotic as comparing bale to young cos one had a bad season and another had a good one. :clown: hE has been injured continously for the last couple of seasons. so if they had lost, they would have been useles.. guess that makes hazard useles... :clown: so by "you are one of the fools", do you even mean JOSE MOURINHO? did he get fooled by the brand name too? so basically, anyone who comes back from an injury and does not perform well is now a torres.. people are so bright these days.. :clown: so u can predict falcao's 2nd season after his injury.. hmmm.. wow!!! you are a psychic!!! or i guess no player ever has had a poor year after an injury.. hmmm,, :clown:

and i am gonna remember your post when all you U-turners will be saying "what a move from jose" yada yada yada.

but he did have a poor year did not he? thats what matters? bale's performances were worse than young so we should start comparing them, was not that your logic behind comparing falcao and crouch. :clown: :clown: a midfielder like bastian (B2B) has more running to do, more challenges to put, so... :clown: atleast get your fucking stats right u moron.. it was a euro qualifier not a friendly. just goes on to show exactly what u know. copa america is being held in chile right? so thats their home ground. a below half strength mexico.. so i guess, vidal and sanchez are useless. someone not agreeing with this transfer - fair enough. somone comparing falcao to crouch - idiot-fact. get it!!!???

so your measurement of a player's ability is a year..hmmm.. well i guess then that bale would be a 10mil pound player for u, right. since he had a bad last season. a lot of players do get their form back after injuries, rooney, costa, reus, bastian to name a few. chile could not beat mexicoB. sanchez and vidal suck belgium lost to wales, hazard sucks cocks. like i said... hahahhaha.. dumbass, so cuadrado is already a mistake. 300 minutes of football with chelsea and he is a mistake. now i guess what category of idiots you belong to. guess you were one of those morons who thought malouda was mistake before he became one of our best players in 09-10 season.

so i guess a season defines a player now. well in that case if we should not buy bale for free!!! and every person who is a united FLOP for a whole season (OMG, that too right after an injury) should be shunned.

i am so gonna enjoy rubbing it in people's faces.