didierforever

andy fucking townsend can see how shit iva is. jose cant. shameful. the only reasons that can be possible 1. he actually feels iva is fine and our performances have been brilliant and all. in that case, we need to get rid off him, cos he has lost it. 2. favouritism - IF this is the case. boot him out of the club right fucking now. 3. he thinks iva-azpi is better than azpi-baba. even if that was true, why the fuck did we buy that boy? and even if that is somehow true, it can not possibly be any worse to take a risk. so i just cant see a way to support him at this moment.

hhhahahahah,,, seriously think so? still the first name on the pitch!!!

hahhahahaha,, okay

"You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." never has a line suited a situation better. sorry to say this, but irrespective of the result today, things have to change MASSIVELY and if that includes a manager change, so be IT.

pathetic. absolutely pathetic. cant believe how far down jose has fallen. sad.

hahahahahhaha,, pathetic. absolutely pathetic.

"The only thing I can share is that in every match we played better than the result. Even against West Bromwich where we won, the 3-2 victory looks a very, very, very tight match and it wasn't. The result should be completely different. I say the same in the defeats against City and Palace and the draw against Swansea. Circumstances of the match gave us results worse than the performance. So I'm positive." wow!!! jose has become josenger. i mean these are not good signs. if he actually feels that we performed well and that we deserved a better result at the etihad or against palace, there would be something majorly wrong in his assessment.

true. i guess "dogs on the street even know Mikel is useless" is a perfectly valid and logical statement. right?

what is it with people and mikel? i just have never been able to understand it or probably never will. he is not the best player around by a light year, but atleast he fights for the team unlike some of our current players. he is good in a specific role and a system. limited, YES. USEFUL? definitely YES. i guess, people just want a scapegoat even if the scapegoat maybe playing or not and infact be a better option that some of our current first teamers.

we have conceded 9 goals in 4 games. playing hazard thru the middle while having cesc on the pitch will probably be the worst decision jose can make.

hahahah.. nah man!!! was suspended for a week, but i sure felt like ending something or someone right then and there though!!! actually it all turned out for the best. cos believe me, if i was here after the palace game, i would have got a straight forward ban.

they might score and we would lead 2-0 at HT only for mccarthy to own cesc in midfield through out the second half and naismith/kone to give iva a nightmare all thru the second half and lukaku to score a winner in dying seconds. or maybe stones. lets be honest. if either of those 2 are on the field, we are losing the game.

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2015/9/7/9271663/jose-mourinho-chelsea-interview seems weird since he is the one who has got us off track with his poor selections. 7 points out of 4 matches with 2 back to back wins compared to 4 points out of 4 matches with a disastorous result at home against palace. massive difference mr. mourinho. and all because you wont accept and drop your favourites.

i dont think "slowness" is the main problem here. defensively, our center mid with cesc and without oscar is a DISASTER.

courtois azpi zouma GC baba matic mikel pedro oscar hazard costa. subs begovic, JT, iva, ramires, willian, falcao, cesc. BUT, we all know iva will start, cesc will also start. and we will lose cos of those 2.

chalobah, boga, solanke, brown - have a slight chance. except for that NO ONE. shame though, we have some really good talents.

I think this specifically deals with the current squad members only. if salah and cuadrado were to be included then so would our other loanees like mvg, marin, kalas, piazon etc etc... for a whole of about 120mil euros.

against pool he played as a no.10

Name Fee Asmir Begović 11 Thibaut Courtois 9 Jamal Blackman 0 Branislav Ivanović 12 Kurt Zouma 14.6 Baba Rahman 20 Papy Djilobodji 3.5 Gary Cahill 8.4 John Terry 0 César Azpilicueta 8.8 Ola Aina 0 Cesc Fàbregas 33 Ramires 22 Oscar 25 Eden Hazard 40 John Obi Mikel 20 Bertrand Traoré 0 Kenedy 8 Pedro 27 Nemanja Matić 25 Willian 35.5 Ruben Loftus-Cheek 0 Radamel Falcao 0 Loïc Rémy 13.2 Diego Costa 38 Total 374

fair enough that zouma could do the same job but currently we have 6 defenders and zouma is probably our best CB. he should anyways be on pitch. if you are saying that we should sell mikel and buy someone like moutinho/carvalho. i am on board. but nothing tells me we want to do that. yes, they do.players but mikel is "useful" to this present squad. i cant say that for the likes of fernando/flamini/arteta who are the other bench player.

no way would we have turned down 34mil pound+oscar deal. NO WAY.

the last match was an indicator of why he is still useful to the squad. would u want RLC/chalobah coming on in the 80th minute with a man down and a goal lead to protect or would u want mikel? i have no doubt who i would want to see.

he makes their squad improve multifold. also, honestly, i dont rate navas at all. he is a technicaly better valencia. poor finishing, no vision whatsoever, but immense workrate and pressing and good dribbling. there were times last season when city were craving for some creativity except from silva. think KDB can provide that.

certainly. i could see how brilliant he is over the past few weeks.