

didierforever
MemberEverything posted by didierforever
-
yup. bad decision. but i think this one has to be blamed on the line's man. i think he told the ref that the foul was inside the box. the ref took his time before giving the decision.
-
wtf!!!! how the fuck did he miss that... come on vic!!! put one in the back of the net...
-
jose enrique...
-
??? lucas is not on the pitch. also moses had no role in the goal. ps- my FPL captain just scored... come on danny boy... get a hat-trick..
-
very poor first touch... should have put pool 1-0 up...
-
people think that u r the same player when u r 18 and when u r 20. delusional *#$#$#$@$
-
pathetic how players go down for the bare minimum of the contact. should never have been a pen.
-
he is a troll. forget him.
-
believe me i am one who is "for" the loan considering we could not loan/sell ba. but trust me, their are many who think he is shit and no where near "good enough for chelsea".
-
In the last 2340 minutes in the #PL , #CFC strikers scored 1 goal ( Torres v Everton in May) Lukaku scored 4 in 110 minutes@ChelseaStats
-
barkley is having an absolute shocker!!! has lost the ball every time he has touched it!!!.
-
kompany out!!!! lukaku can absolutely have a field day i feel....
-
city were supposed to lose 0-1. that pretty much should setthle it.
-
did any1 see that set piece routine... nice!!!
-
brilliant chest down from lukaku, barkley should have had a shotatleast. also what a turn!!! kompany will have a hard time getting a yellow so early...
-
TAKE THAT!!! thats LUKAKU for u!!!! not good enough???
-
he is not good enough!!!! he cant break defences!!!! take that... take fucking that!!!!... ps-fuck everton!!! what a ball from toure...
-
he is not good enough!!!! he cant break defences!!!! take that... take fucking that!!!!
-
stupid fucking naismith...
-
no rambo? i think u have left out 2 out 4 definite starters for almost all of mou's PL games (rambo, iva, oscar, cech)
-
u said, OZIL HAD A LOT OF COMPETITION IN NO.10 SPOT FOR GERMANY for WC 2010. dint u? did or did not germany play with a no.10 in wc 2010? did ozil play for germany from 2002 to 2008, NO. so who the fuck cares what happened then. also if u had a bit of a common sense and a milligram of a brain, u would have understood that "now" was actually "not" in the first sentence of my previous post which i have already edited. but seems to be too much for u. makelele left cos perez deemed him surplus to requirements after getting beckham, to which zidane replied "Why put another layer of gold paint on the Bentley when you are losing the entire engine"... nothing was said so right now about the world's best player unfortunately. just goes on to tell how expendable ozil was. IF CR GOES. BIG IF BUDDY. get in the real world. but probably a big ask for u. how is la-la-la land treating u? since u r so adamant about saying how a person, who simply by selection into NT becomes a "LEVEL OVER" another one, i just gave your bizzare argument another twist. seems stupid, right? get urself admitted into a mental asylum. i know, it wont help a lot. but miracles happen.
-
i was not the one saying "ozil is a level above than mata in creativity", he was. hence that argument. dont think it can in any way come back to me. as for jose deeming oscar "a better player", i dont think so. jose wanted mata to adapt to his way. mata had played 45 minutes in the pre-season and against villa, he seemed match-unfit and physically unfit. mata needed the time. also jose wanted a no.10, who can defend. comeback and do a number on the opposition midfielder. if the point had been solely about who was more creative, it would be a no-brainer.
-
when i was born and watching football is none of your concern. TELL ME WHO WAS GERMANY'S NO.10 IN THE WC 2010 APART FROM OZIL. also germany plays with 4-2-3-1. so while every team might not have a no.10, germany definitely do. another time u have dodged this question. its getting pretty embarassing now. they dint say isco was a better player, but the sale of ozil says he is pretty replacable. not something u would expect for the best cam in the world, right? i mean which team sells the world's best player??? u need to get a brain to understand football, but since u have been dealt a bad hand by god himself, who am i to complain. if u want to give another stupid argument that mata should start over oscar, if he is that good, then if ozil is the best player in the world then he should have no problems in the RM team, right? i thought mata too got called up for NT. by the way, when did NT be the criteria to see who the best player was?did ribery win his "best player in europe" award for his performances with france? as far as the NT goes. what has ozil won? mata has a WC and euros with spain, add to it his CL and EL with chelsea. tell me what has ozil won with one od the best clubs in europe (rm) and one of the best NT in the world (germany). seems people would go to any idiotic and senile levels to defend their arguments. keep up the charades!!!!
-
hahahaha... oh mr. know it all. ozil is the best cam in the world and very much comparable to granero and canales. BRILLIANT. germany were 3rd in 2006WC and runner up in 2008 euro but talk about players that were in germany for WC 2010. rolfes, ballack, frings, kuranyi all out. was there any1 comparable to the world's best cam? or are u going to just tell me what positions germany got in euros and wc. seems u actually dont know anything but go about saying the weirdest possible things. i follow madrid enough to know what is going on with them. and let me get this straight. u think ozil is "A LEVEL ABOVE THAN MATA AND ISCO". but madrid, on isco's inclusion, deem ozil surplus. so probably the best player in world to have ever played (zidane) and one of the best managers in the world (carlo ancelotti) deemed that isco was a better player for RM (who want to win everythin and be the best in the world) than ozil. so THAT tells me more than your comparision. i seriously think, u need to actually come up with a better argument. because when u give a statement like "ozil is a level above than mata",i would think that u actually might think so for a reason or atleast have decent argument for the statement. but since u think so just because ozil plays for germany but mata does not for spain, i would like to say that this is the weakest and most pathetic argument i have seen by any1 in a long long time.
-
i know, for that u can go to otamendi thread and read me explaining the exact same loan thing to BUSHMAN. i m not challenging his loan. i am challenging the fact that people are discrediting everything he does by sayin its just everton. the point of the loan is to see if he can handle the pressure, and lead the line up of a top7 team. he has done that, and done that winderfully. hugely responsible for 6 points everton got from their last 2 games. i just want credit to be given where its due.