didierforever

^another dig at our manger who gave him his full debut at anfield. talk about being OBSESSED and GROWING UP. talk about someone having BALLS.

every? learn to read!!! and obviously there will be an obsession with our record signing and highest paid player when he turns out to be the biggest flop any1 could have imagined plus cos of him we sell off players like sturridge. also,why and what would a torres fan even talk about. his hopeless performance game after game or his sitter misses game after game. atlast we have a good striker who will send him to his best place. the bench or hopefully the reserves!!!

oohhhhh!!! fine then, torres - 2238 minutes, 11 goals, 6 assists = 131 minutes per a goal or assist. etoo - 2707 minutes, 14 goals, 7 assists = 128 minutes per goal or assist BA - 884 minutes, 8goals, 3 assists = 80 minutes per goal or assist lukaku - 2801 minutes, 16 goals, 8 assists = 116 minutes per goal and assists. etoo is a proper link up center forward. the difference was there to be seen when etoo played for us (a fit etoo, that is). ba is a goal scorer, and that is what this proves. what is torres??? his stats say he sucks!!! his performances are horrendous match after match. also, we want to sell him but no one wants to buy a 200kper week costing piece of @#$%.

torres played a total of 2238 minutes for us this season scoring a total of 11 outstanding goals. he played 90 against ATM where we parked the bus. in short, he played 2148 minutes of proper football scoring 11 goals, at 195 minutes per goal. what a player!!!! give him an extension plus an additional 200k raise!!!

u mean torres played well in fa cup and europa league under FSW. well that level seems right for him. infact perfect for him. also, saying torres played "well" is nothing but exageratting anything he has done by 100 times. infact i remember his most pathetic performance for us to be under FSW when almost every1 gave up on him, the club world cup final.

oh look, another fangirl. i am here cos ROMAN took over. you are here cos the blondie plays for us.

no one thought bertrand would be anything more than a 2nd left back!!! the only reason people loved bertrand was cos of his magical night in the CL final. and what a p[erfect analysis of chalobah's chelsea's career. i mean he is a 19 year old and u have already ruled him out. infact swift and baker are barely months younger to chalobah. but wait, u can pretty much guaranteee it!!!

why do u torres fangirls have to screw up everyone's mood and be such a party pooper. dont u have a collection of torres' goals that u can watch to keep u calm. oh wait!!!! that collection must end real soon, right??? here, we have a person who is gonna say " see, i told ya. bring back torres" as soon as costa does not score a goal in even one match!!! happy-trolling!!!

By age 21, Drogba realised that he had to establish himself as a player soon or else he would have little chance of becoming a professional footballer. He made his first team debut for Le Mans soon thereafter and signed his first professional contract in 1999. by the age of 21, DD had scored a total of 7 goals in his PRO career playing in french league 2 (not even ligue 1). also, lukaku might not be all that great like we "hype" him to be, he is probably just the best young striker in the world at this moment.

serious question? why should we fall back to a song-cesc pivot when they already have proven to be poor!!! if rambo goes for 25mil (which i agree is a lot of money) then we should definitely be looking to sign another WC CM. i dont trust cesc one-bit. a pogba/vidal should be the kind of player we should be looking to sign!!!

3 more??? who why? how?

ba was going to arsenal. but it was before they put a last minute bid for ozil. giving them BA, a very decent 2nd striker and goal scorer (if not a better player than their current lamppost) would have been a way bigger mistake.

would be great to see him back!!! more as a manager than as a player. costa-lukaku-DD. would help lukaku to keep his head cool and learn a lot of stuff!!!

kalou was let go. so was bosingwa, mikel dint have much part to play, so every needs a scapegoat. unfortunately rambo's performances last half season were pretty poor so people are scapegoating him. nothing new on here. i expect rambo to come back stronger than ever. with cesc, we will have the fluidity of changing to 4-3-3 which suits him more than anything else. so keep calm and trust in jose.

thats very unfair to him and the board and ROMAN. it simply wont make sense from our board to let him sell mata, kdb and luiz but "enforce" cunt fiberglass cesc fabregas(let me start taking his proper name) on him. it simply does not add up. maybe jose himself wants to play a different way. with matic, he knows he has the defensive shield, now he has got a creative midfielder. he can always rely on rambo when needed as a DM. jose would probably have prefered modric or vidal but considering the price cesc is available in, he would be the right option. add to that, getting a HG player which we severely lack. i think we are all jose as of this moment. the board got him back, backed him in transfers, on team's performances and are still doing so in my opinion.

put surez in the photo and the caption , THE GOOD (costa), THE BAD (torres) and THE UGLY (suarez) would be perfect.

didierforever, on 07 Jun 2014 - 2:53 PM, said: And for that very reason I'm having a really hard time figuring out why Chelsea would agree to loan him out for a year and then let him go for free when there's still some money to be made from selling him this summer. Surely there's some club out there willing to pay a few million to tie him up on a permanent deal this year. this was our first tete-tete. where i said that he will probably be loaned out rather than being sold. this is where it all began if i am not mistaken. i said that knowing how bad the la liga clubs are financially. they are far differnt from PL clubs like fulham who can have a 30 memeber squad or hull city who can buy long and jelavic. for those teams getting romeu would be next to impossible. the only clubs that can get him are (RM, barca, ATM, sociedad, bilbao and valencia). in none of whom will he be able to get the first team role, not sure if they would even want him. hence the statement that loaning him would be possible. we might get lucky with some PL team going for him. already there are reports of WHU being interested. but considering there is one year on his contract, we would be lucky. as for the argument of repeatefly saying the amount of time he has spent on the pitch and the medical room was for a reason which u still have not understood. there is a difference in oscar or rambo getting injured after playing each and every match in the season. the more u play, the more u r probable to get injured. this guy does not do that. his injured time to his playtime is poor, very poor. whcih is what makes him injury prone for me.

let me enlighten u with one thing. when u get one injury and another to follow that, that is when u r considered injury prone. are u trying to convince me or urself by continously taking into account his one year where he had no injuries. IN THE LAST 2 YEARS ITSELF, he has missed more matches due to injuries than he has appeared in. and if u are so interested in taking into account the 11-12 season then please do the same with 10-11 season. which mean in the last 4 years, this guy has had 5, thats right 5 injuries. not injury-prone??? simply lol. that too for a 22 year old kid. how tough is it to understand this simple thing. in his pro career that would have spanned a max of 6 years he has had 5 bloody injuries. u have got to be kidding me now!!!!! seriously!!! valencia finished mid table. and hence i said so. also while valencia have been a pretty consistent club. they have been on the decline for the past 3-4 years. and that is showing. this league position does not lie cos right now they are a top half-mid table team. getafe , levante and celta vigo will spend 5mil on romeu. getafe spent a total of 5.72mil pounds, leavante spent 200k celta vigo spent 4.4 mil. the total expenditure of these 3 clubs combined is 10mil and u think one of them will spend 5mil. on romeu alone. i mean the extent of lolness is UNIMAGINABLE. seriously dude, stop playing fifa/fm or whatever ps game u r on right now. i mean at least u should know the bloody facts of what u r talking about. its like a child blabbering. and now my best part. "they were not desperate". they were barely chasing fabregas for 3 years. during the WORLD CUP celebration they just made him wear barca's shirt. someone even said "fabregas is barely on loan to arsenal for another year". but they definitely were not desperate. :lol: arsenal are not a hard club to negotiate but barca's transfer history is awesome, right? i mean 40mil + etoo for zlatan. . precisely, since there is no way to no FOR SURE of what the reality, deal with what evidence is in front of u. no need to say " why the fuck... blah blah blah"... i will reply to what u have written. please dont tell me what to do. u reading it or not is your problem. but someone needs to tell u something about your opinions. (i escpecially loved the part of vigo, levante, getafe) literally made me .

25mil. thats it!!! why casemiro? that too for 15mil!!!! with the luiz money, plus the rambo money we can easily afford to buy pogba/vidal.

so ACL injuries should not be counted from now on!!! ok dude. sure. and dude, look athe the photo at the top of the page. last 2 year, he has missed 38 + 3+ 11=49 games. get a calculator and check it!!!!!! how does is exclusion from the squad even be a factor in what i wrote. do u even bother reading??? did romeu walk into the valencia line - up? what world are u even living in? i mean he just spent a year on loan in a middle team la loga team where he got a totla of 1200 minutes in the whole season and yet, he will walk into the line up of almost any la liga team. UNBELIEVABLE!!!! please get your romeu goggles off. he is not half as good as u make him out to be!!! yes, i have heard of it, but sometimes in our desperation common sense and logic goes out of the window. do u know that? like when to just get better off torres, we decided to let go off anelka, DD, kkalou, sell sturridge and loan out lukaku? common sense would say HELL NO!!! yet we did it. barca were DESPERATE for cesc. desperate does not even being to describe the feeling. his buyout clause itself was 200mil euros which shoul;d tell u what barca actually thought of him. he was not a bit part polayer. he was the player who was supposed to carry on their legacy. he was their next xavi, their sould and spine of the team. for them, they were not going to sell him no matter what, that was the thinking their. do u get that part???? oh wait, fifa and FM cant reciprocate these right!!! so would be hard to understand for u!!! also, great links. one liners in the whole articles whereas the articles i sent were simply on this topic.

yes. yes. yes. yes.

didierforever - infact that was my reason for clubs not to buy him. their wont be many clubs fighting it out for an injury prone, 1 year left on his contract, "decent" player. we will "try" to sell him off but doubt that would happen. probably he will end up on loan just to get his wages off our books. jype - Where is this injury prone bullshit coming from? While at Chelsea he had that unfortunate knee injury that kept him out for a long time but other than that I don't recall him being injured much except now this year for a while. Is Van Ginkel now also injury prone and shouldn't be trusted? didierforever -most of the "sites" and "sources" report it as 50% of the transfer fee!!! JYpe - Why the fuck would Barcelona have agreed to that, basically that would mean they payed €40m for 50% of Fabregas three years ago. yes dude u r a saint!!!!! absoluite (like u would love to put it) FUCKING saint!!! right? a 22 year old who has had 3 injuries missing more than half a season in the season before and more than 10 matches in the last season is not injury prone? a 22 year old? not a 25 year old? he has had 2 major season at the top level at in both he has had major injuries. but he is not injury prone and infact is a low risk 5mil buy!!!! so RVP is not injuiry prone since he has barely been injured the season where united won the league and just one injury last season. look at the bloody time he has played and the bloody time he has spent on the medical table. that should tell u if a player is injury prone or not. 3 injuries in the last 2 years playing 2000 minutes of pro football. seems like a perfect player. romeu has made a total of 27 appearances (not even starts, just appearances) for CLUBs while missing 49 matches due to injury. this player is made of steel!!! u really proved that he is not injury prone!!! also, i am still waiting for u to show me a link where its given that barca is going to FUCKING pay half of the profit? i have already given 2 in the cesc thread? got nothing fucking to say?

i am being hostile? u cant go a post without saying "fuck" and i am the one hostile? fine. dude. whatever u say!!1

i am fine. dont u worry about me. i just dont understand that why lukaku has not already been sold if he actually put in a request. i mean KDB was. essien wanted play time and he was. we could have kept him here, and sold him in the winter. again, i ask u. if he was loaned cos he was a talent, what has changed in these 9 months. has his loan spell been poor. NO. average. NO. its been close to very good!!! he has proved himself playing for a club that finished 2 places below us and was even in the top 4 fight. so why will jose be looking to sell him NOW!!! PS - all this is only "IF" lukaku did ask for a transfer.

" IF"... still got nothing else, i see.