didierforever

Has been a 8.5-9/10 for brazil in the 3 matches so far. Was barely 6-6.5 for us. He will be CRITICAL for us next season. Anither average season would mean our chances of winning the PL decreasing drastically. Neither will jose get another chamce in that case nor will he. So far chelsea's future, I hope he shows more CHARACTER for us next season.

Negredo for 15mil euros!!! That's an awesome deal. City must be crazy!!!

Cunt. Asshole. Well nothing in the world is bad enough that can be said that is bad enough for him.

Still think he would have been a better 5am specially considering he is HG than salah. But his potential is not that high. No doubt would be a good player for everton and in competitions like EL like he has already proved to be. Also we should be able to make up whatever we spent on him plus a couple more (also we got 1mil £ from pool for the loan spell). So financially, a good trabsfer.

Pogba for rambo and lukaku and torres. Not sure if are buying pogba or a combo player of zidane, pele and beckenbauer in one player. I would rather take my chances with cesc, matic, rambo, mvg.

After we ripped them off for 50mil on luiz, we would really be lucky if we get cavani's hair for 50m from psg!!! He would easily cost north of 65mil. They themselves bought him for 60m, do not have to sell him for any reason and infact he will be massively important if they want to win CL. So really think even 65m is unrealistic.But like u said "ridiculous as usual". Not at all suprising considering who u quoted.

next season is going to be his seaso Damn... he is a proper pool player!!!

Now mbia is better than mikel. Poor mikel!!! Always getting slaughtered on here!!!

AGAIN!!!!! U do understand that even torres INCREASED his value for pool. His "greats" seasons were twice but his decline itself had come in pool. Torres at his best may have been worth that ridiculous amount. Luiz at this moment which is supposedly the highest point of his career is not worth more than 20mil. Luiz was not AWFUL for us. No where have I said that. But 50mil for him is absolute LOL.

Dude... common sense!!! I mean what is wrong with your common sense??!!! Seriously dude... let me spell it out for u!!!Torres came to pool at the age of 23 for a fee of 20mil £. Luiz came to chelsea at the age of 24 for a fee of 25mil £. Torres came to chelsea at the age of 27 for a fee of 50mil £. Luiz is going to psg at the age of 27 for a fee of 48mil £. GET THE ANALOGY!!!! Get how the transfer fee means jack squat!!!!

Did u even care to read what I wrote? Did u even inderstand the analogy I tried to put forth!!! What a waste of time... The analogy of how similar their transfer careers are? Should I bother explaining again cos don't think someone who can't see luiz's shortcomings would be able to comprehend that. I mean seriously how difficult is it to understand this one thing that the 50mil £ transfer means jacksquat cos we made the same mistake with torres. But well, poor vidic was never as good as luiz cos he costed barrly 6mil so...

Dp

What was the amount that liverpool bought torres for? Was it 20mil £? Very near to the amount luiz was bought by us!!! What was the amount we bought torres for? Is it 50mil £, the same amount that luiz was bought for by psg? Atleast get your FACTS right if you want to do a comparision. So even torres was VERY WELL SOLD!!! Their transfers are very similar!!!! Luiz might not be as big a flop as torres simply cos he is a good footballer and has some fabulous character which torres never ever had. But if u can't see a simple FACT that psg over payed for luiz by more than half his amount then seriously well I can't help. By the way Torres was also bought after a year or 2 of pretty average football and when he was no where near worth 50mil. Another similarity in these transfers. As for luiz the transfer, the fact that a supposedly non-wc defender in cahill and a past his prime and aged JT were ahead of luiz in the eyes of our manager should be proof enough of how good luiz is. The fact that he will be replaced by a 20 year old kurt zouma should be another indicator.

Ohhhhkkkk. That's fine.So torres to chelsea = 50mil £ FACT. CARROL to pool = 35mil £ Fact. They are a piece of shit strikers, that's just an opinion. I too am having a hard time taking thw opinion that torres is shit seriously now.

We bought a 25mil £ 24 or something year old, potentially world next best center back. Fair enough? Maybe but STILL over priced. I am not denying any facts. If price was a criteria to see a Players' calibre then luiz would have been the best EVER.Unfortunately for him and fortunately for the world it is not. The fact is that while luiz is a top top FOOTBALLER, his concentration, brain darts, decision making make hin anything but a world class defender. Those are the facts.

according to robguima... bale is better than ronaldo, messi, maria etc etc.. infact bale is the bestest player EVER. since the transfer market is the best way to.judge a player. Also torres os better than DD, zlatan, henry etc etc. Torrss is the best striker. He was also brought for 50mil and the narket does not lie.

and we would be dogding a bullet!!!

Lets change the question from Future chelsea captain to this one: If JT gets injured from a couple of weeks and suppose jose thinks that courtois is the man between the poles (hence cech is sold or 2nd choice). Who would your player be THIS SEASON to wear the armband? courtois azpi GC iva luis cesc matic willian oscar hazard costa for me its a no-brainer. should be IVA.

matic-vidal. now thats a pivot that can dominate the world. but it will also render 27mil for cesc as a bit of a waste.

then lets stop all the discussion and make hazard the captain. cos as far as i remember cesc in known to choke with the game on the line and has a huge question mark on his character and general fight. as for respect and importance to the squad, dont think he will be ahead of the likes of cahill and iva and simply should not be. also, casillas was not RM's first team player last season. puyol was barca's. yet they were the club captains. messi does not get the armband when puyol is absent. xavi does, if not him valdes does. club loyalty and longevity should take a massive precedence in such cases specially when their is not a natural leader like JT in the squad.

how is cesc even in the polls? the club captain should be based on the club's loyalty, longevity, status.

pepe would be a delight to have. but a CB pairing of benatia/mangala-kompany. along with midfield re-inforcements of fernando is scary!!

would any defender be able to replicate those performances for a team like arsenal or tottenham. vidic was a monster a year ago. jones was supposed to be the next best thing possible a year ago under saf, the person who stopped CR. moyes comes in, structure falls down, and defenders are exposed!!!

so we played a low block against cardiff in the last match. norwich? whu? aston villa? sunderland? i really dont think so. in most of those matches and for the majority of those matches we were camped inside the opposition half waiting for a moment of magic. i have given u link to what our manager thinks we played, so that along with the matches should really take out all doubts. also, cahill is brilliant in a low block, it suits cahill when the opposition simply goes long ball on us, he is pretty good in england be in the world cup or the qualifiers. well... ummm.. i think pretty good all round defender then, i will say. cahill not being good on the ball or not doing a luiz by taking the ball in the opposition third and then leaving us open to the counters is hardly a reason why i would not call him world class. he is a defender, his job is to defend first and be a threat from the set pieces to help the team. (otherwise the day is not far way when people say CR is not world class cos his contribution in defence is next to nothing).

bad news... it means they will definitely buy mangala.