didierforever

So people still can't see his "potential". Within a span of 5 minutes he created 2 chancea. One for neymar header and another a brilliant cross field ball. Or are narin and kakuta still better

Marin and kakuta are better than oscar. AWESOME. And people say I give oscar a lot of stick!!!

I had a debate with a united fan. Can someone drom somewhere tell me how much united got from fabio and buttner deals. Supposedly their sales paid for half of shaw transfer.

Corrected.

And kakuta

4mil £ for him are probably 4mil £ too many.

Some one start the slow clap. Brilliant. Owned.

4 months for a 3rd time offense. If I went to my work place and bit a co worker, I would be lucky enough to get a job ever. And if that bite was the 3rd time, I would be sent to an asylum. Lol punishment. A season should have been bare minimum.

Wow. I write why I think he was good. And the reply is "not true. He was bad."Ok dude.

not good enough??!!! He has been the main stay of the team. Has covered every blade of grass in every match. Has tackled everyome standing. Linked up well be it on the right wing, left wing or thru the center. He and gustavo have been the stand out players in the furst 3 matches.

Well he definitely was. If u think he was not good in the second half of the first match where he owned modric twice, won almost all 50-50 balls in the mid and scored a goal then I can't see what earns a tag of good performanxe.In the second match, he was the player thru whom evrything went in the first half. Still remember him running past people on the flanks to make brazil's best opportunity in the first half.

Has been a 8.5-9/10 for brazil in the 3 matches so far. Was barely 6-6.5 for us. He will be CRITICAL for us next season. Anither average season would mean our chances of winning the PL decreasing drastically. Neither will jose get another chamce in that case nor will he. So far chelsea's future, I hope he shows more CHARACTER for us next season.

Negredo for 15mil euros!!! That's an awesome deal. City must be crazy!!!

Cunt. Asshole. Well nothing in the world is bad enough that can be said that is bad enough for him.

Still think he would have been a better 5am specially considering he is HG than salah. But his potential is not that high. No doubt would be a good player for everton and in competitions like EL like he has already proved to be. Also we should be able to make up whatever we spent on him plus a couple more (also we got 1mil £ from pool for the loan spell). So financially, a good trabsfer.

Pogba for rambo and lukaku and torres. Not sure if are buying pogba or a combo player of zidane, pele and beckenbauer in one player. I would rather take my chances with cesc, matic, rambo, mvg.

After we ripped them off for 50mil on luiz, we would really be lucky if we get cavani's hair for 50m from psg!!! He would easily cost north of 65mil. They themselves bought him for 60m, do not have to sell him for any reason and infact he will be massively important if they want to win CL. So really think even 65m is unrealistic.But like u said "ridiculous as usual". Not at all suprising considering who u quoted.

next season is going to be his seaso Damn... he is a proper pool player!!!

Now mbia is better than mikel. Poor mikel!!! Always getting slaughtered on here!!!

AGAIN!!!!! U do understand that even torres INCREASED his value for pool. His "greats" seasons were twice but his decline itself had come in pool. Torres at his best may have been worth that ridiculous amount. Luiz at this moment which is supposedly the highest point of his career is not worth more than 20mil. Luiz was not AWFUL for us. No where have I said that. But 50mil for him is absolute LOL.

Dude... common sense!!! I mean what is wrong with your common sense??!!! Seriously dude... let me spell it out for u!!!Torres came to pool at the age of 23 for a fee of 20mil £. Luiz came to chelsea at the age of 24 for a fee of 25mil £. Torres came to chelsea at the age of 27 for a fee of 50mil £. Luiz is going to psg at the age of 27 for a fee of 48mil £. GET THE ANALOGY!!!! Get how the transfer fee means jack squat!!!!

Did u even care to read what I wrote? Did u even inderstand the analogy I tried to put forth!!! What a waste of time... The analogy of how similar their transfer careers are? Should I bother explaining again cos don't think someone who can't see luiz's shortcomings would be able to comprehend that. I mean seriously how difficult is it to understand this one thing that the 50mil £ transfer means jacksquat cos we made the same mistake with torres. But well, poor vidic was never as good as luiz cos he costed barrly 6mil so...

Dp

What was the amount that liverpool bought torres for? Was it 20mil £? Very near to the amount luiz was bought by us!!! What was the amount we bought torres for? Is it 50mil £, the same amount that luiz was bought for by psg? Atleast get your FACTS right if you want to do a comparision. So even torres was VERY WELL SOLD!!! Their transfers are very similar!!!! Luiz might not be as big a flop as torres simply cos he is a good footballer and has some fabulous character which torres never ever had. But if u can't see a simple FACT that psg over payed for luiz by more than half his amount then seriously well I can't help. By the way Torres was also bought after a year or 2 of pretty average football and when he was no where near worth 50mil. Another similarity in these transfers. As for luiz the transfer, the fact that a supposedly non-wc defender in cahill and a past his prime and aged JT were ahead of luiz in the eyes of our manager should be proof enough of how good luiz is. The fact that he will be replaced by a 20 year old kurt zouma should be another indicator.

Ohhhhkkkk. That's fine.So torres to chelsea = 50mil £ FACT. CARROL to pool = 35mil £ Fact. They are a piece of shit strikers, that's just an opinion. I too am having a hard time taking thw opinion that torres is shit seriously now.