didierforever

thats very unfair to him and the board and ROMAN. it simply wont make sense from our board to let him sell mata, kdb and luiz but "enforce" cunt fiberglass cesc fabregas(let me start taking his proper name) on him. it simply does not add up. maybe jose himself wants to play a different way. with matic, he knows he has the defensive shield, now he has got a creative midfielder. he can always rely on rambo when needed as a DM. jose would probably have prefered modric or vidal but considering the price cesc is available in, he would be the right option. add to that, getting a HG player which we severely lack. i think we are all jose as of this moment. the board got him back, backed him in transfers, on team's performances and are still doing so in my opinion.

put surez in the photo and the caption , THE GOOD (costa), THE BAD (torres) and THE UGLY (suarez) would be perfect.

didierforever, on 07 Jun 2014 - 2:53 PM, said: And for that very reason I'm having a really hard time figuring out why Chelsea would agree to loan him out for a year and then let him go for free when there's still some money to be made from selling him this summer. Surely there's some club out there willing to pay a few million to tie him up on a permanent deal this year. this was our first tete-tete. where i said that he will probably be loaned out rather than being sold. this is where it all began if i am not mistaken. i said that knowing how bad the la liga clubs are financially. they are far differnt from PL clubs like fulham who can have a 30 memeber squad or hull city who can buy long and jelavic. for those teams getting romeu would be next to impossible. the only clubs that can get him are (RM, barca, ATM, sociedad, bilbao and valencia). in none of whom will he be able to get the first team role, not sure if they would even want him. hence the statement that loaning him would be possible. we might get lucky with some PL team going for him. already there are reports of WHU being interested. but considering there is one year on his contract, we would be lucky. as for the argument of repeatefly saying the amount of time he has spent on the pitch and the medical room was for a reason which u still have not understood. there is a difference in oscar or rambo getting injured after playing each and every match in the season. the more u play, the more u r probable to get injured. this guy does not do that. his injured time to his playtime is poor, very poor. whcih is what makes him injury prone for me.

let me enlighten u with one thing. when u get one injury and another to follow that, that is when u r considered injury prone. are u trying to convince me or urself by continously taking into account his one year where he had no injuries. IN THE LAST 2 YEARS ITSELF, he has missed more matches due to injuries than he has appeared in. and if u are so interested in taking into account the 11-12 season then please do the same with 10-11 season. which mean in the last 4 years, this guy has had 5, thats right 5 injuries. not injury-prone??? simply lol. that too for a 22 year old kid. how tough is it to understand this simple thing. in his pro career that would have spanned a max of 6 years he has had 5 bloody injuries. u have got to be kidding me now!!!!! seriously!!! valencia finished mid table. and hence i said so. also while valencia have been a pretty consistent club. they have been on the decline for the past 3-4 years. and that is showing. this league position does not lie cos right now they are a top half-mid table team. getafe , levante and celta vigo will spend 5mil on romeu. getafe spent a total of 5.72mil pounds, leavante spent 200k celta vigo spent 4.4 mil. the total expenditure of these 3 clubs combined is 10mil and u think one of them will spend 5mil. on romeu alone. i mean the extent of lolness is UNIMAGINABLE. seriously dude, stop playing fifa/fm or whatever ps game u r on right now. i mean at least u should know the bloody facts of what u r talking about. its like a child blabbering. and now my best part. "they were not desperate". they were barely chasing fabregas for 3 years. during the WORLD CUP celebration they just made him wear barca's shirt. someone even said "fabregas is barely on loan to arsenal for another year". but they definitely were not desperate. :lol: arsenal are not a hard club to negotiate but barca's transfer history is awesome, right? i mean 40mil + etoo for zlatan. . precisely, since there is no way to no FOR SURE of what the reality, deal with what evidence is in front of u. no need to say " why the fuck... blah blah blah"... i will reply to what u have written. please dont tell me what to do. u reading it or not is your problem. but someone needs to tell u something about your opinions. (i escpecially loved the part of vigo, levante, getafe) literally made me .

25mil. thats it!!! why casemiro? that too for 15mil!!!! with the luiz money, plus the rambo money we can easily afford to buy pogba/vidal.

so ACL injuries should not be counted from now on!!! ok dude. sure. and dude, look athe the photo at the top of the page. last 2 year, he has missed 38 + 3+ 11=49 games. get a calculator and check it!!!!!! how does is exclusion from the squad even be a factor in what i wrote. do u even bother reading??? did romeu walk into the valencia line - up? what world are u even living in? i mean he just spent a year on loan in a middle team la loga team where he got a totla of 1200 minutes in the whole season and yet, he will walk into the line up of almost any la liga team. UNBELIEVABLE!!!! please get your romeu goggles off. he is not half as good as u make him out to be!!! yes, i have heard of it, but sometimes in our desperation common sense and logic goes out of the window. do u know that? like when to just get better off torres, we decided to let go off anelka, DD, kkalou, sell sturridge and loan out lukaku? common sense would say HELL NO!!! yet we did it. barca were DESPERATE for cesc. desperate does not even being to describe the feeling. his buyout clause itself was 200mil euros which shoul;d tell u what barca actually thought of him. he was not a bit part polayer. he was the player who was supposed to carry on their legacy. he was their next xavi, their sould and spine of the team. for them, they were not going to sell him no matter what, that was the thinking their. do u get that part???? oh wait, fifa and FM cant reciprocate these right!!! so would be hard to understand for u!!! also, great links. one liners in the whole articles whereas the articles i sent were simply on this topic.

yes. yes. yes. yes.

didierforever - infact that was my reason for clubs not to buy him. their wont be many clubs fighting it out for an injury prone, 1 year left on his contract, "decent" player. we will "try" to sell him off but doubt that would happen. probably he will end up on loan just to get his wages off our books. jype - Where is this injury prone bullshit coming from? While at Chelsea he had that unfortunate knee injury that kept him out for a long time but other than that I don't recall him being injured much except now this year for a while. Is Van Ginkel now also injury prone and shouldn't be trusted? didierforever -most of the "sites" and "sources" report it as 50% of the transfer fee!!! JYpe - Why the fuck would Barcelona have agreed to that, basically that would mean they payed €40m for 50% of Fabregas three years ago. yes dude u r a saint!!!!! absoluite (like u would love to put it) FUCKING saint!!! right? a 22 year old who has had 3 injuries missing more than half a season in the season before and more than 10 matches in the last season is not injury prone? a 22 year old? not a 25 year old? he has had 2 major season at the top level at in both he has had major injuries. but he is not injury prone and infact is a low risk 5mil buy!!!! so RVP is not injuiry prone since he has barely been injured the season where united won the league and just one injury last season. look at the bloody time he has played and the bloody time he has spent on the medical table. that should tell u if a player is injury prone or not. 3 injuries in the last 2 years playing 2000 minutes of pro football. seems like a perfect player. romeu has made a total of 27 appearances (not even starts, just appearances) for CLUBs while missing 49 matches due to injury. this player is made of steel!!! u really proved that he is not injury prone!!! also, i am still waiting for u to show me a link where its given that barca is going to FUCKING pay half of the profit? i have already given 2 in the cesc thread? got nothing fucking to say?

i am being hostile? u cant go a post without saying "fuck" and i am the one hostile? fine. dude. whatever u say!!1

i am fine. dont u worry about me. i just dont understand that why lukaku has not already been sold if he actually put in a request. i mean KDB was. essien wanted play time and he was. we could have kept him here, and sold him in the winter. again, i ask u. if he was loaned cos he was a talent, what has changed in these 9 months. has his loan spell been poor. NO. average. NO. its been close to very good!!! he has proved himself playing for a club that finished 2 places below us and was even in the top 4 fight. so why will jose be looking to sell him NOW!!! PS - all this is only "IF" lukaku did ask for a transfer.

" IF"... still got nothing else, i see.

jose said "lukaku should say why he is at everton and not chelsea" that means "lukaku put in a transfer request". so when jose said he wants hazard to be better next season, did he mean hazard put in a trasnfer request. when jose said oscar was poor in the 2nd half of the season, that definitely HAD to mean he put ina transfer request what maybe everyone at the club out ina trasnfer request!!!! LUKAKU is a talent, right? so what has changed now? after the summer trasnfer window we had a winter window, in which we could have made a negotiation with other clubs about lukaku. infact since we have already sold luiz, why have not we done that with lukaku? is it because our manager STILL wants him at the club. so, jose is thinking about keeping a player at the club who asked for a transfer.... WEIRD!!!!

remember when sturridge had said that he can be a 20 goal a season striker if given a chance to prove himself. yet we thought he was all talk and no play. and now a player saying, "we have options like torres, ba and costa, so i may have to leave", is a player who is supposedly tooting his own horn!!! :lol:

is it the same sky sports that reported cavani, hulk,falcao were joining chelsea. based everything on one articles. dont think jose said lukaku wanted a "transfer". if he had said he wanted a transfer, why dint our manager sell him? oh probably cos he though lukaku has a future with the club!!! has that changed cos of his performances this season? i dont think so? so if our manger jose mourinho did think that this club was better off without LUKAKU, why dint he sell him? maybe u r wrong then? is not that easy to explain even if u look at it your way!!! wasnot our captain and legend JT, going to go to CITY before he signed a new deal. should not he be ridiculed!!!

Romelu Lukaku has admitted he may have to leave Chelsea this summer amid speculation the club are closing in on Diego Costa a massive difference between saying he wants to leave and he may have to club. he said"chelsea buy a lot of player every window. there are ba, torres and costa, so i may be leaving." then he goes on to say that he already has talked to the club. what wrong did he say exactly?

he asked for a transfer? when? 3 days after saying that he wants to stay at the club he loves. how is it that one thing gets all your attention and the other does not. plsu did he even ask for a transfer? costa has proven nothing in a chelsea shirt. dont buy him!!! lukaku already had proven it to the coaches in the pre-season. if 2 months were not good enough to change their mind, what was? he was not willing to wait around, sitting with the reserves waiting for torres, ba and etoo to fail and then be given a chance meanwhile destroying his WC dreams. the badge means a lot more to me too. and hence i am supporting him. the saddest part is, u dont have anything against him except for this one instance? like i said SO BLOODY WHAT? so what if he asked? he is still our best striker!!!! its your arrogance to not support a certain player cos he supposedly "hurt your feelings" or something that is making u go against him rather than any logical reasoning.

why the fuck would they buy neymar for 86.2 mil. why the fuck would they pay the taxes if they actually dint buy neymar for that amount. why the fuck would they even buy neymar when the whole world knew they needed a CB first. why the fuck would we buy torres for 50mil. why the fuck would we sell sturridge and keep torres even after 2 years of shit from him? i dont know WHY? thats what is "reported". by MANY tabloids. i have already given a link, so fucking read them.

injury prone bullshit? we are talking about romeu right? 2012-13 he gets to play 5/6 matches under FSW, gets injured. 2013-14 he gets to play 5 consecutive matches at valencia, gets injured. i mean romeu "apparently" missed 13 matches this season for valencia cos of injury playing a total of 1300 minutes. in 2011-12 he played a total of 485 minutes and missed half a season. BUT this guy definitely is not injury prone. he is such a good player that a valencia team finishing 8th in the la liga barely played him. talk about exagerating our players' prowess. he is 22 years old and has never played more than 5 games without getting injured.plus most of the la liga clubs are in a bad shape financially. look at ATM and u will get a clue. how is he a low risk signing for them. if ATM signed him for 5mil euros, he would cost more than the average of their team that beat chelsea at the bridge. lets wait and watch if la liga teams would actually LINE UP for his signature.

oh dear god!!!! fine, a 20 year lukaku, wanting to play at the biggest stage and competition in the world, got selfish and "asked for a loan move" so????? what the FUCK is the point here? he proved that he is better than the 3 idiots we had got!!! he has proven that he is one of the best young players around. but we should sell him off cos he dared ask for a loan move when there were already 3 other strikers in the club. brilliant!!!! i mean talk about fixating on one point!!!! again, so what if he asked for a loan? so bloody what? do we have another 21 year old striker who has scored 30 league goals in the last 2 seasons? NO. do we have a striker who has scored 30 league goals in the PL in the last 2 seaons? NO. have all our strikers COMBINED. YES. all of them COMBINED have scored exactly 30 goals which is 2 less than what lukaku ALONE has. also why the hell are people even replying to "lukaku asked for a loan. OMG, lets kill him." let them be!!!

maybe then. but since thats a barca forum we would get only a certain point of view. i have yet to read any site that has said 50% on the "profits". ALL of them say 50% of the fee.

infact that was my reason for clubs not to buy him. their wont be many clubs fighting it out for an injury prone, 1 year left on his contract, "decent" player. we will "try" to sell him off but doubt that would happen. probably he will end up on loan just to get his wages off our books.

most of the "sites" and "sources" report it as 50% of the transfer fee!!!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/arsenal/8703312/Arsenals-sense-of-loss-from-Cesc-Fabregas-departure-softened-by-clauses-in-his-Barcelona-contract.html http://www.givemesport.com/170332-buyback-clause-added-to-arsenal-40m-playmaker-deal

probably a loan. just one year left on his contract. dont think clubs would want to waste millions when they can get him for fee next season.

is it true that arsenal will get half of fiberglass' transfr fee??? i dont know what the reality of this is but one of my friends (arsenal fan) said this could happen Why Arsenal have refused to active the buy-back option? When we sold Cesc to Barca for £36 million we inserted 2 clauses. First one was buy back option. Second 50% sell of player and last one was if Barcelona win Champions league Arsenal will get another 1.5 million. Which won’t happen now. Now I’ll come to main point. Why Arsenal have refused to active buy-back option? I’ll tell you why but first lets go through second clause. If Arsenal don’t want to sign player Barcelona will sell to other club and there are numbers of clubs are chasing Cesc. Currently as we heard Chelsea are leading to sign Cesc and we also heard Chelsea have made bid around £33 million.if Barca decide to sell Fabregas to Chelsea, Arsenal will get 50% of £33 million that’ll be £16.5 million. Personally I don’t see Barcelona selling Cesc for 16.5 they are waiting for Arsenal to make bid which Arsenal won’t. Now here is what I think will happen. Arsenal definitely wants to sign Fabregas but not for £33 million. Arsenal are waiting for Barcelona to accept offer from any club.Then Arsenal will make last minute ditch offer which will be more than what Barcelona are getting for example if Barca decide to sell player for £33 million. Barca will get £16.5 million and then Arsenal might try for around 18-20 million. Barca won’t have any choice but to sell Cesc to Arsenal any idea about this?