didierforever

can't bother!!!! Really can't bother!!!

The person I quoted said something of the order of would u replace willian with schurrle?I said I would rather replace oscar with schurrle. Please tell me what that would mean? Please tell me how I twisted anything? Is not our main trio of Ams willian- oscar-hazard right now??? If someone says he would rather want schurrle in place of oscar, aCHELSEA fan or rather ANY chelsea fan would understand that he means willian/hazard thru the center and not schurrle. Really dude, its not rocket sciemce like I said befote. Or the minimum u can do is read what I wrote and what I quoted to understand the context. This is a forum like u said and most of the times people will write in a way that is comfortable to them, they would not be thinking about ways to explain everything to shery33 specially when it is so obvious. Willian was good for chelsea, oscar was not. That's what matters. Oscar is in terribke form, willian is not, another thing that natters. And if u can't see how poor/average oscae has been after the croatia game and those 2 chnces agaibst mexico, then I am sorry, I can't waste my time.

1)Muller goal - didnt mark. 2)Klose goal - Just standing there 3)Kroos 1 - Just wandering about 4)Kroos 2 - Who? Where? What? 5)Khedira - Decided that Im midfielder. 6)Schurrle 1 - Just standing in the middle. 7)Schurrle 2 - Behind the striker.

oh!!! see sherry33 another person understands and says the same thing, does not he!!! i really was not talking about rocket science, was i?

What role did willian play for us towards the end of the season when oscar was dropped time and again. Was it the AM role? Oh I think it was!!! How shocking...So would a schurrle- willian- hazard trio make sense!!!! Why not!!! Infact another person made the same comme t, dint he!!! But well, u would require to know a certain details of our players to understand the majority of the posts on here which is well, out of your pay grade. But anyways... keep the oscar love fest on...

i would start the next season with schurrle instead of oscar!!!

How is it that this thread is active only when he makes a mistake or even half of it. Showed more balls than all the rest combined. Was pretty good from the moment he came on. Keep it up rambo!!!

What a beast!!!!! Not good in counter attacks, and too skow .. this guy is a world class player.

Definitely NO. Which begs for the question to be asked... why exactly dint jose throw lukaku out when he actually (apparently) asked for a transfer.

Some of the people's opinions really make me laugh. What do those guys want us to say? That luiz was picture perfect in this 7-1 humiliation? He was the bkoody captain. The captain that we wanted for chelsea ( ). He started the humiliation by loosing muller for the easiest of goals. 4 goals within a space of 6 minutes will always go down to lack of character and leaderahip on the pitch. Character is not just hokding up neynar's shirt during the anthem. There is a lot lot more than that to be a true leader. So happy we are rid of him.

Luuz... ... leader indeed...

The onlt thing more pathetic than lukak's statements are the people who are holding down a personal grudge agaibst him. He asked for a loan... so what?Is he still our player? I think I asked u the same questtion and am yet to get answers to tjose questions. If lukaku dis ask for a transfer, why was not he sold? What has changed since then, has he performed poorly... hell no. So u mean to say that since we have costa, u r fine with toores and ba as backups?

again? i think we have been thru this!!!

"manage" him... tell him to shut up... have no media interaction... fine him... or at the least give him a chance to prove himself on the field and prove his worth!!!! that is what we are supposed to do!!! selling off our a potential world class striker... a 21 year old PL proven striker in a team whihc has torres and ba as their only striker right now!!!

2014-15 : pogba 2013-14: cavani and falcao 2012-13 ; hulk 2011-12 : modric some players who will be linked with us thruout the window with next to no chance of us actually buying them!!!

would be worse than the sturridge trasnfer if we sold him!!!! idiotic to say the least!!!

20mil!!! and that too spurs!!!

united? is a 34 mil shaw not enough!!!

whats wrong with people on here???

benatia's gone. or rather will be by the end of the window!!

can we get rid of torres by the 16th???

does that mean no loan spell?

so why do people keep saying that we own half oh his shares. i am a bit confused?

i think i just explained why spending 20mil pounds on a 29 year old luis who can give a MAX of 3/4 years of WC performances it left back is a bit silly!!! while spending 25mil on rodriguez who is 21 is very viable from a monetary point of view. luke shaw was not worth 20mil let alone the rumored 34mil tag. rodriguez is a FAR better player. its barely 7 days into the window. if we cant get luis, i expect us to look at rodriguez, moreno or sandro as the next options.

even if rodriguez costs 25mil pounds, it is an investment for the next 8-10 years. luis costing 20mil pounds for the next 3/4 years MAX is not the ideal deal and the club is doing good in recognizing that.