Everything posted by LAM09
-
As much as people don't like being told it, we're making a lot of moves similar to those of a midtable side. If we are banking on Estevao, Paez, etc. to take us to the next level in 3+ years, we could be in major trouble. Although you act as though they don't, they do. Once more, I've been reading exactly the same posts that you have, and I haven't come across anyone who believes that Guiu would solve all of our problems—like our CF problems, for instance. I brought up Haaland as a U20 athlete. Check out his Dortmund & Salzburg stats. This is the problem with you selectively choosing the information that you feel is appropriate for you. Best to leave this pointless discussion as is.
-
Where exactly did I mention that? Any 18yo successful goalies you remember? I'll go one better for you, Donnaruma at 16-17 years of age -Gianluigi Donnarumma - Detailed stats | Transfermarkt Thibo at 19 years of age (another example close enough to show the former isn't a generational talent) - Thibaut Courtois - Detailed stats | Transfermarkt Do you want me to debunk any more theories? Each player ought to be assessed appropriately. But it feels like a cop-out to me to pick and choose how to judge someone based on their age, price tag, position, or whatever league they play in. Did I not mention Haaland? If you are truly prepared to keep to the topic at hand, I'm happy to have any discussion on it. Please direct me to the people who are requesting "too much" from Guiu.
-
Everyone, I believe, was expecting Guiu to be given a chance rather than being sent off as soon as possible (rumours at the moment). These goalposts are difficult to follow. Can we only judge players above a certain age, or is it dependent on their position?
-
My post was edited for that specific reason. Talking about the expectational - Estevao is supposedly in that bracket. Should we give him a few years to prove himself when he comes next season, or should we aim for figures akin to those of a certain player, Neymar (a stupid comparison, IMO)?
-
Haaland didn't do too bad.
-
That happened almost 13 years ago; things have drastically changed. I'd imagine him (and most likely those caught on film) will be facing serious bans considering it took place while on NT duty. FYI, we are also doing our own investigation as well.
-
Chelsea 'restart pursuit' of £29m star who had 'no regrets' after snubbing them last year | Football | Sport | Express.co.uk
-
Looking at a player's numbers gives you an idea of what they can offer, especially where attackers are concerned. If someone scores 100 goals in two seasons in Italy, is it a moot point because Serie A is a weaker league or nothing compares to the Prem? I have no idea if your POV is one of ignorance, as this seems to be the case far too often. I just want a natural goal scorer (Alvarez isn't one for me). It doesn't get more black or white than that. The best recent example is the Copa America, where Alvarez scored two having started four games, while Martinez scored five having only started one. I'm aware this is a small sample size, but it shows the point I'm trying to make and puts the following to bed - completely different system, with teammates with different characteristics, and playing in a different role. That's a valid reason. However, I don't think they are willing to break it unless it's someone in a similar position to Mbappe's this summer - one of the best around whose contract was up. I personally feel that is Alvarez's best and most effective position, behind a real number 9. People's preferences depend on what they really want, I guess. Osimhen trumps anything obtainable during this window and solves the biggest issues we've had since Costa left. If we're going to talk about wages being too high, we might as well forget any hope of signing Alvarez for the exact same reason.
-
He has scored 20 goals in 67 EPL games, playing for comfortably the most dominant side in the league. This isn't a dig at him; I just feel we need an out-and-out scorer with the current crop of players. The Firmino comparison is lazy when you consider who was playing on either side of him. Imagine Firmino playing upfront; we'd be reliant on Palmer (based on last season's numbers).
-
Lukaku's departure to Napoli is inevitable, which would have considerably reduced any outlay for Osimhen. Personally, I don't get the narrative around "gambles," given that no player is guaranteed to duplicate their form elsewhere or perform to their full ability. Osimhen would have been a calculated gamble, with Lukaku moving the opposite way. Based on your prior statements, I assume you'd support Alvarez joining for £75 million~; nevertheless, he'd be a bigger gamble, imo.
-
Profit comes first for them. Roman wanted us to be European & World champs so badly. During the majority of his ownership, he put his money where his mouth was, which is a large reason we were as successful as we were.
-
Martinez (the United one) was on a video call in the background while Alvarez was sat next to Enzo. It goes to prove that the players on that list are more sensible. A number of players have already unfollowed him, making their feelings known indirectly. How does any "bad blood" magically disappear & not cause friction amongst sections of the squad?
-
I assume you are referring to Partey. If this is the case, then based on where the alleged incident occurred, there either were no charges filed in the first place or they were quickly dropped. Rather than justifying such behaviour, I'm just going off what I know (should be locked up with Greenwood). Enzo was LIVE STREAMING. Can it get any more incriminating than that?
-
The club wouldn't rescind his contract, so we'd get some money back. Do you honestly think the club wants to be painted with the brush of having racist ties to save £20–30 million? As @YorkshireBlue said, no player is bigger than this club.
-
What does his price tag have to do with his actions? If our players and owners have a serious issue with the video, I don't see how an apology will do anything. Have a look at what Mudryk did compared to Enzo.
-
Clubs & organisations within this country try to take a tough stance against all types of discrimination. Have you actually watched an Italian or Spanish top-flight game recently? How others act is totally irrelevant anyway. As the saying goes, "get your house in order." If Boehly & Co. are people of their word, Enzo will either have to face serious punishment or be sold during this window. I'm still lost for words with such responses, which are trying to downplay what's happened. We're in 2024, not 1904.
-
I hate to break it to you, but that's the problem right there. Enzo clearly seems to be having a fun time singing a "harmless 😐" song with his teammates. Any individual has to accept the consequences of their actions and take accountability.
-
Let's not forget that we have a sizeable group of French players who are black as well. This runs deeper than some on this board seem to realise.
-
Shouldn't you do research before using random images, then?
-
It all depends on how stubborn our board is. Will they be more willing to ignore the wage structure (within reason) for a special player?
-
Nothing less than £200k will entice a "top player" to join, particularly in Willliams' case as one of the stars of the Euros.
-
First Mudryk, now him. When will common sense actually become common?
-
He doesn't strike me as that type of person. Playing time is his main priority unlike Money Mase. Ah, okay. I wasn't aware of that. We should stand a great chance of getting him if we actually go all in.
-
I thought they'd have an advantage having done business with them not too long ago (Tel).