hjperdeath

Not the general consensus?

This is an interesting read. http://defendingwiththeball.wordpress.com/2014/08/04/defending-as-a-form-of-attack/

There's nothing to get over. People are disappointed, they express their feelings. I'm expressing mine..

Sarcasm? What sarcasm?

People sad over a 6 month loan. What a judas. :'(

he isn't anyone. But when you question a man who's given everything to the club when he was fit and good enough doesn't warrant the shit he's getting. Someone question's the loyalty of a man who played for this club in a CL semi-final a week after his mother died, then people can question that person's loyalty.

Day 3 and our club is still filled with Judas's.

City were the only club once he joined City. Like I've said many times before if he wasn't English, he would have been in Melbourne. I'm not insinuating that he wants to get one back at the board. We shouldn't be disappointed at one. Frank is a model professional who cares about his fitness. His story with us is done and he can do whatever he wants to keep up his esteem and level. If this was the 2004 Frank Lampard retiring then there would've been a problem. But he isn't that Frank. This is the Frank that struggled for quite a while to play in a deeper role. He couldn't offer us anything more.

Now the poor guy has no family...

6 months, wrap up everything you have left in England with your family, and then move together to New York rather than hurrying things. Decision made by a man who puts his family first. A human being.

True, agreed. No class.

I'm talking about match fit man. quite a large difference. it's a common misconception trust me. I've seen players stay fit with personal coaches and when they make a return to football after 8-9 months, their legs feel wobbly, they don't feel right chasing a ball and they always think thrice before making a pass. They are at the end of the day humans.

Yes he created it. He hates us. Loathes us. He's at the end of the day a judas scum along with every legend that has played for us. I agree. He's not a victim for joining a team that recognized him with a proper contract.

He's a football player who wants to stay fit, he's done way too much for us and asking him not to play at all for 6 whole months isn't what he deserves.

Poor journalists, the rockets must be really loud. Obviously much more scarier than seeing your family ripped apart in front of your eyes in a location where you've been told to evacuate that was supposed to be safe.

People clearly assuming that Frank had a choice in choosing his own loanee club when he joined New York , a team owned by City..

Jose's said a lot that he doesn't mean. it's kinda obvious that Drogba isn't anymore, just like Torres is. He won't come straight out and say stuff because in the grand scheme of things, it just wouldn't be right for Drogba to hear it. But its really kinda obvious.

Bringing Drogba back was more for motivating and helping the young squad we have rather than using him as a striker. As a striker he wasn't the same since 2010. Age caught up with him. We've lost out on few games last season where we weren't fully up for the small games. It's a psychological thing. Drogba will help.

ask him, he said it. I counter'ed him with what Mourinho said.

This .

They actually can. Cause they own the club. It was either City or nothing because NY knows that if they corner him, and not let him go to Australia then he'll have no other option than City who desperately need an English player. The fact that we aren't taking the side of a man who's given over 10 years and everything for the club while thinking that a rival club are innocent tells a lot about us. Lampard has no say in a loan offer apart from agreeing a contract. And City have money. Fuck loads of it.

he wouldn't. But he didn't join City. His sole intention was to do what the rest did, finish things off for himself in America. That was the dream. I don't believe that he would wake up one morning saying that he wanted to join City. He wanted to keep himself fit. Just like David Villa. Villa went to Australia and Frank wanted to as well. But sadly he is Frank Lampard, born in England. New York and Manchester are basically brothers from different mothers. Manchester City needed an English player , so he was technically obliged to go there without asking questions. If it was David Villa Thomas, then he would be English too and he would right now be in Manchester. Two perspectives because until now people are only assuming things about why Frank went there and I don't think he ever had a single intention of joining them outright.

Man played a week after his mother fucking died just so that we continued our run in the CL. Thank god he doesn't read the forums. No class and no respect it seems, look in the fucking mirror and say that.

He can go wherever he wants if we drastically decrease his role at the club. It was time to move and he did. New York was a complicated option but only for 6 months. The fact that people are actually swearing at him shows how fast people forget.

He couldn't go to Australia cause New York wouldn't allow that. Only City because City need an English player. He has no say in it apart from agreeing a contract.