hjperdeath

Firstly Cuadrado isn't Brazilian. Neither is he overhyped. actually underhyped because he just recently came into public view after the World Cup despite being vital to Fiorentina. Sanchez and Antoine haven't played a single game yet and you have already classed him above someone who's has had tremendous domestic performances with an odd patch here and there..

He's nothing like Willian, but I don't want him either. The signing wouldn't make sense at all. We need to concentrate on getting in a forward.

Still fill they will lose track in the middle solely due to the man in charge. They finally splashed cash after realizing that you need to spend to win in the current era, but it isn't enough,

If the aim is attractive football this season then Schurrle should be a natural starter. It's not like his work-rate is that bad either.

that's true to an extent. He doesn't dare to take risks as often as Eden or Oscar do and sticks to what Jose probably does tell him to do.

I don't really think its a about laid back mentality, because if he did, Mourinho wouldn't be playing him. I would be more inclined to believe that he's been instructed to play like that.

Even with Schurrle, I still see him as a starting player next season, especially in the big games. Stats or not, he aid Mourinho's way of playing.

Hope he moves there. Would really fast track his development. I'm done with them going to the Championship.

He actually was. I remember reading the Barcelona forum back then. Many surprisingly had him on Thiago level after Cuenca had a breakthrough season.

That is actually quite harsh. He was one of Barca's biggest prospects and could have had a big leap on his development chart if he had regular playing time.

I write my own rules...

We'd almost lost Bridge, but Ken Bates brought it back after a long fight and introduced CPO shares. We also had a rather successful period under him.That's the good side. Negatives : Shed End was made small and he introduced the hotels and apartments around it. It seems like one of the big reasons why we can't expand and we're put in a situation where we might have to leave the Bridge. The subsequent banning of Matthew Harding (who invested 27 million pounds in the club upon Ken Bates's request) from the stadium and branding him as an evil man. 'I don't believe evil should triumph and he was an evil man...This is a much happier ship at Chelsea now he's no longer around' (just a year after his death) didn't sit down with Chelsea fans either. We went on to name one of our stands as the Matthew Harding. He also banned Ron Harris (Chopper man), and Osgood from the grounds. Obviously not going to go down well with us. He wanted to control the Head Hunters hooligan element in the Stamford Bridge crowd by using electric fences. Pretty sure Chelsea fans were ridiculed to be compared to poultry. The Greater London Council rejected the idea and he called them 'cretins' . A lot of people also had a problem with him when he modified the Chelsea logo in a bid to modernize the club. His creation of Chelsea Village plc was a bad business move considering that he was a businessman. We ran upto debts of 3 million which eventually grew to 80, and the man who rescued us from debt brought us down into it again. Roman initially purchased 49% of village plc and the following month he kept buying shares until he could take it in private hands. But I'm pretty sure everyone was initally pretty happy. He rocked the boat with what he did later on though. I wasn't however alive then though, I was to small to really care about what happened in the background. Someone like zolaeyes , TOPTB or our senior members could explain it better.

Clearly you are his next agent. Left for more money, ha.

Yes. You obviously didn't call him judas. That money probably depicts him like Teresa. Sensitive? I'm not the one questioning his loyalty or status at the club for a 6 month loan..

I'm sure you can see quite a few other members, and I don't have to quote all the drivel to you really.

Not the general consensus?

This is an interesting read. http://defendingwiththeball.wordpress.com/2014/08/04/defending-as-a-form-of-attack/

There's nothing to get over. People are disappointed, they express their feelings. I'm expressing mine..

Sarcasm? What sarcasm?

People sad over a 6 month loan. What a judas. :'(

he isn't anyone. But when you question a man who's given everything to the club when he was fit and good enough doesn't warrant the shit he's getting. Someone question's the loyalty of a man who played for this club in a CL semi-final a week after his mother died, then people can question that person's loyalty.

Day 3 and our club is still filled with Judas's.

City were the only club once he joined City. Like I've said many times before if he wasn't English, he would have been in Melbourne. I'm not insinuating that he wants to get one back at the board. We shouldn't be disappointed at one. Frank is a model professional who cares about his fitness. His story with us is done and he can do whatever he wants to keep up his esteem and level. If this was the 2004 Frank Lampard retiring then there would've been a problem. But he isn't that Frank. This is the Frank that struggled for quite a while to play in a deeper role. He couldn't offer us anything more.

Now the poor guy has no family...

6 months, wrap up everything you have left in England with your family, and then move together to New York rather than hurrying things. Decision made by a man who puts his family first. A human being.