test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Spike

Politics & Stuff

Started by Spike,

6,974 posts in this topic

possibly , but i wouldnt have thought so.

there could be strong pressure from the Government ,, not sure what EUFA or FIFA would rule ,, We have Welsh teams but Wales isnt Independent

BlueLion. likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there could be strong pressure from the Government ,, not sure what EUFA or FIFA would rule ,, We have Welsh teams but Wales isnt Independent

i wish it was.

sorry , i just hate england (politically)

not geographically , its a nice home

zolayes likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There should be one British league, with England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales together.
The idea of having three separate football-wise nations, is a relic of the distant past from beforethewars.
Football was regarded as an inland sport so, they said, why not have a few British national teams to play each other ?
The British did not even participate in the first European champion cups, the Pushkas-Di Stefano years, To the football supremos of the time it looked a low key affair, like one of those American summer series we have now (the one CFC took part this year).
It was England only back then and in fact the team was not bad really. They could n't win the world cup, but they were good - not the "this is a ball and this is a net" stuff we hear today.

The artificial division does n't make sense anymore and the nations should unite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There should be one British league, with England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales together.

The idea of having three separate football-wise nations, is a relic of the distant past from beforethewars.

Football was regarded as an inland sport so, they said, why not have a few British national teams to play each other ?

The British did not even participate in the first European champion cups, the Pushkas-Di Stefano years, To the football supremos of the time it looked a low key affair, like one of those American summer series we have now (the one CFC took part this year).

It was England only back then and in fact the team was not bad really. They could n't win the world cup, but they were good - not the "this is a ball and this is a net" stuff we hear today.

The artificial division does n't make sense anymore and the nations should unite.

I agree. And German swiss and austtia should also be together

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason that Cardiff, Swansea and Newport play in England is there's no professional leagues in Wales. That's why Celtic and Rangers will never play in England. Also don't forget that the E.C.B. in Cricket is the English and Welsh Cricket Board. As for the old European Cup Chelsea would have been the first English team to play in it but the board turned it down. They asked Matt Busby at Man United the following year and they said yes ultimately because they had such a good young team. Of course we know how tragically that ended in there second season.

cosmicway and Fulham Broadway like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i wish it was.

sorry , i just hate england (politically)

not geographically , its a nice home

ENGERLAND ENGERLAND ENGERLAND

Me too, shithole, the only thing we're good for is cricket and that's usually only when we feel like it.

lucio and NishC300 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There should be one British league, with England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales together.

The idea of having three separate football-wise nations, is a relic of the distant past from beforethewars.

Football was regarded as an inland sport so, they said, why not have a few British national teams to play each other ?

The British did not even participate in the first European champion cups, the Pushkas-Di Stefano years, To the football supremos of the time it looked a low key affair, like one of those American summer series we have now (the one CFC took part this year).

It was England only back then and in fact the team was not bad really. They could n't win the world cup, but they were good - not the "this is a ball and this is a net" stuff we hear today.

The artificial division does n't make sense anymore and the nations should unite.

celtic would never qualify for the CL in england, so it wouldnt benefit them. and the potential fan trouble would be high, considering almost half of scottish people want nothing to do with britain

countries in britain arent best friends, and I wouldnt want culture diluted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love and adore England. I feel English people so close to me. We have too many Englishmen in Mugla. They're moving buying houses for sun and sea :) I don't why but i love England even more than my nation, the only thing i dislike about my country is Islam. Hopefully they'll get rid of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russia and the US bombing different targets in the same airspace....

so no room for any fuck ups there then...

I love how everyone who was already bombing Syria without permission from anyone, even from the UN, and some actually against the wish of their own people and votes of parliament are all now upset how Russia didn't take their permission to bomb Syria :lol:

It never ceases to amaze me how some countries see nothing wrong with acting like they fucking own the world.

kellzfresh likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how everyone who was already bombing Syria without permission from anyone, even from the UN, and some actually against the wish of their own people and votes of parliament are all now upset how Russia didn't take their permission to bomb Syria :lol:

It never ceases to amaze me how some countries see nothing wrong with acting like they fucking own the world.

The US does rule the World, and the sooner you Lebanese chillum smoking Hezbollah harbouring hipsters grasp it, the better. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate what modern society (at least in the west, in-particular the USA) is becoming. Every cunt is offended by everything.

Tropes are offensive.

Stereotypes are offensive.

Jokes are offensive.

Being a white, straight male is offensive.

Having a different opinion is offensive.

Hypocritical bastards. 'People shouldn't be ashamed of who or what they are unless you are white'. Dammit, nobody should be ashamed of their race.

I hate how people feel the need to shoehorn sexuality and race into media. For what purpose does making a character 'gay' serve unless it is relevant to the story? If their sexuality is irrelevant to anything what does them being gay (or straight, or bi, or whatever you want) matter? It the ultimate form of sexism/racism and dumbass writers are too stupid to realise they are writing incredibly terrible characters at the detriment of equal rights.

In The Witcher 3 there is a series of optional quests. At first they all seem disconnected but if you look closely, it subtly tells the story of a lord's son and a stable boy being lovers. There love is forbidden and the lord's son ends up committing suicide and the stable boy became an outcast in his village. This in turn triggers an event of another village being haunted; a woman mention to the lord his son's suicide and homosexuality and the lord in turn muders her in cold blood. She become a vengeful wraith that haunts the village and forces people out. That is some great story telling. The stable boys mentions it only once: "They banished me from the castle, for I had laid with a man, and prefered men! Let us not speak on it anymore." Nuance and subtly.

What isn't story telling is when a character's sexuality is portrayed as "I'M FLAMING GAY, HAHA I LIKE DICK IN MY MOUTH AND ASS, YOU SHOULD ROMANCE ME AND MAKE LOVE TO MY BUTT, MY HOMOSEXUALITY IS THE ONLY ASPECT OF HISTORY AND PERSONALITY AND HAS NO BEARING ON THE PLOT WHATSOEVER, I'M ONLY A POINTLESS CHARACTER THAT PANDERS TO THE SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR CROWD, IF YOU DON'T ACCEPT ME YOU ARE A HOMOPHOBE". This is what Bioware does, they shoehorn in sexuality when it has no purpose other than existing. That is terrible writing. Writers don't shove straight characters into people's faces, so why do it with homosexuals? It makes no sense, if they truly are equal then treat them as such.

Emir and kellzfresh like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, what do people across the world think of the constant shootings on citizens here in the states by other citizens?

More people need to be armed to defend themselves. Everyone should openly carry.

Kieran. likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cause that'll stop shootings like Sandy hook.

The pro gun lobby are right. Open displays of semi automatic and automatic firearms would make people think twice about opening up. Not everyone obviously. Children under 14 should wear kevlar armour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The pro gun lobby are right. Open displays of semi automatic and automatic firearms would make people think twice about opening up. Not everyone obviously. Children under 14 should wear kevlar armour.

Do you think parents would feel safe if their were several adults with automatic firearms in schools? And had to wear kevlar vests? Like they're in a warzone. What needs to be done is more intense screening for those who want to buy weapons. Restrictions need to be put in place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think parents would feel safe if their were several adults with automatic firearms in schools? And had to wear kevlar vests? Like they're in a warzone. What needs to be done is more intense screening for those who want to buy weapons. Restrictions need to be put in place.

I think you make a good point. People with mental health problems, should be given a questionaire before being allowed automatic rifles, or say rocket propelled grenades.

As for schools, I agree M16s or Armalites could be cumbersome, but theres no reason why High School teachers shouldnt openly carry smaller and subtle Heckler Kochs, or Uzis. Some of the latest Kevlar vests are surprisingly lightweight for students, and under age youngsters could carry stun guns or mace.

CHOULO19 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.