People prasing Kalou today

[BLionheart 516]

completely agree , he was in the right position off course .... also you can see how he meant for that to happen even with his back to the ball but that's our kalou , he is not just lucky it's always about positioning and striker's instinct ...

i don't know why would anyone say he was lucky just because he scored with his back to the ball

[Styles 9,790]

I don't think it's fair to compare Kalou and Nani; they operate as wingers, yes, but in different formations. Plus Nani is an out-and-out winger whilst Kalou is in the Anelka mould in the way he is a centre forward who just happens to be moderately effective out wide.

In terms of talent, ability and potential then Nani is so far ahead of Kalou it isn't even worth debating.

Nani has speed, skill, a powerful shot and incredible technique. Things that Kalou seriously lacks.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

In terms of talent, ability and potential then Nani is so far ahead of Kalou it isn't even worth debating.

Nani has speed, skill, a powerful shot and incredible technique. Things that Kalou seriously lacks.

They play in different positions... that's like saying Nasri's better than Kalou as well since he has skill and a powerful shot...

[oxfordblues 299]

nothing wrong with kalou if he`s in blue.

[Styles 9,790]

They play in different positions... that's like saying Nasri's better than Kalou as well since he has skill and a powerful shot...

Kalou has played as a wide forward for large periods of his Chelsea career and at international level. Nani is an attacking wide player (left or right) so the comparison is fine.

Nani has improved tremendously in the last 12 months. I haven't seen any improvement on that scale from Kalou since he has been at Chelsea and he is 25 years old now. Kalou still looks the same player that arrived in 2006.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Anelka's played nearly exclusively for us out wide, yet there's no comparison between he and Nani.

However, that's your opinion, which of course I respect. Although I totally disagree with it. His competency has increased massively and he is far more productive than he was a couple of years ago. What he needs to improve is his finishing - a 20-goal season might sway some doubters.

[BomTrett 50]

Kalou has played as a wide forward for large periods of his Chelsea career and at international level. Nani is an attacking wide player (left or right) so the comparison is fine.

Nani has improved tremendously in the last 12 months. I haven't seen any improvement on that scale from Kalou since he has been at Chelsea and he is 25 years old now. Kalou still looks the same player that arrived in 2006.

Go and get a Man U shirt with Nani on the back then if you fucking love him so much...

Why restart the arguement, it's already happened, but you dont have to come in here and start slagging him (Kalou) off and praising some absolute muppet who plays with a face like a smacked arse and does a stupid flip everytime he scores. Jeeeeeez.

[Styles 9,790]

Anelka's played nearly exclusively for us out wide, yet there's no comparison between he and Nani.

However, that's your opinion, which of course I respect. Although I totally disagree with it. His competency has increased massively and he is far more productive than he was a couple of years ago. What he needs to improve is his finishing - a 20-goal season might sway some doubters.

Completely disagree with that so much I won't get into it.

I'll simply say that Kalou is 25 years old and shows no sign of getting better. This is his best level and it simply isn't good enough to be a first 11 player which has to be the aim.

[NattyBlue 44]

Nani, right winger played on the left, failed, now played on the right and can score some goals.

Kalou, Striker playing as left / right winger. Still playing as left / right winger, scores more goals

tbh, I don't care lol, Kalou, God of Football, up there with the future legends Benayoun and Ramires

Nobody can compare to the epic player that is Kalou.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

I really don't see how you can say Nani has improved and Kalou hasn't. In what way has Nani improved? He's still nothing more than a poor man's Ronaldo-on-a-very-bad-day. He is capable of the odd decent cross and some fancy footwork and puts in a five-minute cameo every match. He does literally nothing for United - hence the reason why a former Wigan player and a 36 year old frequently have started ahead of him.

[zolayes 14,489]

i believe Nani had the chance to kill the game off yesterday with a simple pass to make the score 4 -1 ,,,went for glory with his powerful shot ....

now if that had been Kalou..................

[NattyBlue 44]

Kalou obviously would've passed and won the game for the team, God of Football, nobody compares

[BlueLion. 21,491]

If it'd have been Kalou, he'd have probably knocked the ball out for a throw-in.

[zolayes 14,489]

Kalou obviously would've passed and won the game for the team, God of Football, nobody compares

so far this season he has scored as many goals as Citeh or scumpool

[Madmax 9,219]

so far this season he has scored as many goals as Citeh or scumpool

Zolayes, don't bother replying mate. Haters gonna hate.

[zolayes 14,489]

Zolayes, don't bother replying mate. Haters gonna hate.

I know ..think some of them would be happy to see chelsea lose if the blame could be put to certain players

[Rambo 1,729]

Kalou for golden boot.

[NattyBlue 44]

LOOOOOOOL

lord they're dreadful, good stat we have is though is 2 goal scorers every game