didierforever 7,349 Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 Can't see him even making it here, might as well sell himhe is 19 who has 4 years on his contract. so why would u want to sell him now? let him develop into a player, see how that goes and then make a decision. The Skipper and zolayes 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,141 Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 Brilliant move for both him and Boro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,141 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Nat with Kei Kamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 The club have fucked him royally this season. Waited too long to loan him then sent him to a club who didn't suit him in the slightest and now he's off to a mid-table team managed by Jose's mate after impressing everyone in the league last season.Guy's got all the talent in the world but this year was crucial to his development and we have probably set him back at least 12 months. He might as well start looking for cheap property in Arnhem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 The club have fucked him royally this season. Waited too long to loan him then sent him to a club who didn't suit him in the slightest and now he's off to a mid-table team managed by Jose's mate after impressing everyone in the league last season.Guy's got all the talent in the world but this year was crucial to his development and we have probably set him back at least 12 months. He might as well start looking for cheap property in Arnhem.Hmm. Think you're overreacting a bit. Whilst we didn't do well with the Forest loan, Nat still has half a season to impress at Boro where he'll get plenty of playing time. I also think the Forest loan spell was a massive learning curve for Nat in a sense that not everything goes your way in football. I honestly just hope he does well and reaffirms that he's head and shoulders above most in the Championship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Hmm. Think you're overreacting a bit. Whilst we didn't do well with the Forest loan, Nat still has half a season to impress at Boro where he'll get plenty of playing time. I also think the Foresy loan spell was a massive learning curve for Nat in a sense that not everything goes your way in football.I honestly just hope he does well and reaffirms that he's head and shoulders above most in the Championship.The thing is the club did perfectly with him last season and this season he should've been building on it, but he's actually regressed a bit in terms of where he's playing. So far this season has been a waste for him. Maybe he'll learn that football isn't all wine and roses....but I'm pretty sure the Championship play-off final taught him that too. The Skipper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! ja1 1,166 Posted February 1, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted February 1, 2014 He and Omeruo seemed to do well today in their first starts for Middlesborough. This paragraph also intrigued me from a blog post from Plains of Almeria about Kakuta and our loans in general: http://plainsofalmeria.co.uk/2014/01/29/the-curious-case-of-gael-kakuta/"Nathaniel Chalobah’s disappointing loan spell at Nottingham Forest was characterised by his willingness to play football and Davies’ unwillingness to let him. Asking a player of that ability and talent, who shone as a kid at Watford in midfield, to simply play direct and not “dwell” (i.e. take a touch and look for a decent pass) does what for his development? If anything it puts a cross against him as the loan itself is looked upon as a failure. Why are we putting players into these banal long ball sides with no intent of developing them? Why are we letting inferior coaches and managers reduce talented players to simply becoming water carriers? It makes no sense." zolayes, Tomo, didierforever and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 looked alot better already. 4 tackles and 3 interceptions. (probably more than he managed all season at forest) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mccg 1,528 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Hope he has super 2nd half loan and gives Jose summer headache Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ja1 1,166 Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 http://www.squawka.com/news/2014/02/04/loan-watch-100-tackle-success-highly-rated-chelsea-teen-shines-in-boros-latest-clash/2014020464416 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 http://www.squawka.com/news/2014/02/04/loan-watch-100-tackle-success-highly-rated-chelsea-teen-shines-in-boros-latest-clash/2014020464416 the Englishman’s success in this area was in part down to his athleticism and work rate which enabled him to cover a large area of the pitch.Nice to see an acknowledgement of this aspect of his game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ja1 1,166 Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 Seems like he played a portion of the game against old team Watford at CB, more than one saying he looked more uncomfortable there than midfield. Also Watford fans aren't happy - apparently some handbags with him and Foresteri that earned him a round of boos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Gino 377 Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 Why is it, according to some fans, Chelsea's fault that Nat hasn't had a great season on loan? Isn't he yet to finish playing a full 90 mins for either one of his two loan clubs this season? He's taken a step back for whatever reason and this is down to him, not Chelsea making a poor decision finding him a club, especially one like Boro hurting for money yet still took on his 30k a week wages and his return is underwhelming to say the least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ja1 1,166 Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 He has finished 90 minutes three times for Middlesborough and he lnly arrived in Mid-jan, fans seem generally impressed by him, most want Leadbitter dropped and Chalobah to keep starting. zolayes and The only place to be 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herpthederp 122 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Why is it, according to some fans, Chelsea's fault that Nat hasn't had a great season on loan? Isn't he yet to finish playing a full 90 mins for either one of his two loan clubs this season? He's taken a step back for whatever reason and this is down to him, not Chelsea making a poor decision finding him a club, especially one like Boro hurting for money yet still took on his 30k a week wages and his return is underwhelming to say the least.It's not Chelsea's fault that he's had a poor loan, but it's Chelsea's fault that he's on loan at all. He proved his quality last season, he should be part of the first team squad right now, not out on a pointless loan deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Special Juan 28,141 Posted February 18, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted February 18, 2014 I'm going to the Riverside on Saturday for the Middlesbrough game v Leeds, my little lad is doing the guard of honor flag parade when the players walk out.A friend of mine is well up at MFC and after the game I'm going to the players lounge and intend grabbing a word with Nat and Kenneth. Despiadado.Maleante, The only place to be, We Hate Scouse and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 It's not Chelsea's fault that he's had a poor loan, but it's Chelsea's fault that he's on loan at all. He proved his quality last season, he should be part of the first team squad right now, not out on a pointless loan deal.Loaning him out in August was the right decision at the time. We already had 5 players for his position and he was never going to get any time on the pitch. Couldn't keep him here in Jan because he had a very bad loan spell.The lad is still 19. This is only his second season playing competitive football. What's the rush? TorontoChelsea 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeboii 1,844 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 I'm going to the Riverside on Saturday for the Middlesbrough game v Leeds, my little lad is doing the guard of honor flag parade when the players walk out.A friend of mine is well up at MFC and after the game I'm going to the players lounge and intend grabbing a word with Nat and Kenneth.Tell us how it goes Special Juan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herpthederp 122 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 The lad is still 19. This is only his second season playing competitive football. What's the rush? This is a crucial year of development that he'll be pissing away in the Championship. Chelsea can't expect to ever develop any first team players if they're never going to take a chance on these lads. The only place to be 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 This is a crucial year of development that he'll be pissing away in the Championship. Chelsea can't expect to every develop any first team players if they're not going to take a chance on lads.Would you rather he wastes it here at Chelsea? He's broken into the first team at Boro and getting games. That's already many times better than he would have got here.Of course we're not going to take a chance on a 19yo, unless he is something like the new Messi. How many games per season at Chelsea can you afford to play a completely inexperienced youngster? You can't do that as a top team because you're expected to win every single game.Honestly, I don't expect to see Nathanial here for another two season after he's had a few more loans, probably including a PL loan. TorontoChelsea, jeronimo, nyikolajevics and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.