Jump to content

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Nathaniel Chalobah


Clevemayer
 Share

Recommended Posts

Impressive performance from Chalobah but seriously, what a piece of shit United have payed 15 mil pounds for!

He was impressive second half. He will have his bad games. Remember he is only 20 and is a big reason why Palace are around the play offs. When he moves to United he will be around better players and facilities and will only improve as a player,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Watford - getting a feeling of Martinez at Wigan as usual with Zola. Has the tactics right but the wrong players. Vydra, Chalobah and Hoban the only players I rate from Watford from what I've seen.

I don't think Watford have anywhere near the best side in the Championship. That Zola has them 4th is a good achievement, imo, regardless if they get promoted or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm afraid if Hoban is playing for Ireland, he's not 'British talent'!

Apologies, rookie mistake *blush*, again.

Abdi is also pretty good.

Yes, forgot about him, he looks pretty good as well. Their RB looked half-decent as well. Problem is that Abdi, Vydra and Chalobah are all on loan, they would probably stand a better chane of keeping them(not Chalobah of course) or another loan next year if they get promoted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was impressive second half. He will have his bad games. Remember he is only 20 and is a big reason why Palace are around the play offs. When he moves to United he will be around better players and facilities and will only improve as a player,

He is 18!!!

Edit:Sorry mate you are right i thought you were talking about chalobah and not zaha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just reading a Birmingham fan's blog on the and and he had this to say about Chalobah:

One player that did really impress me was Nathan Chalobah, he controlled everything in midfield, tackled, passed and harrassed, generally kept the team from Vicarage road ticking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is quite impressive Chalobah has got 4 goals in his debut season in profressional football. While McEachran is still searching for his first. I rate both highly, but there's a big difference in the confidence Chalobah plays with.

I think McEachran is a player that plays well when his team is playing well plus it also doesn't help that he contributes almost nothing on the defensive side of the game, whereas Chalobah most often ends being the best player for Watford whenever they do end up loosing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...