Jump to content

Chelsea 2-1 West Ham


 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, bluesman2610 said:

Good fight back if the players are healthy those who ended the game pretty much need to be starting

Looks like Guiu could have a problem. Nkunku V Brighton? 🥲

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mhsc said:

Both of our goals were quite lucky weren't they?

One that needed several minutes of review because it seemed blatantly offside, with a clear foul in the build up

The other a fluke OG

The kind of result that Arsenal somehow get week after week after week.

their goal was pure lucky

I appreciate the team effort. The players show a lot of attitude

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mhsc said:

Both of our goals were quite lucky weren't they?

One that needed several minutes of review because it seemed blatantly offside, with a clear foul in the build up

The other a fluke OG

The kind of result that Arsenal somehow get week after week after week.

I’ll take squeaky wins for the remainder of the season if it means we grab top 4 and CL football next season. Won’t be good for my health but hey this is Chelsea we support

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mário César said:

their goal was pure lucky

I appreciate the team effort. The players show a lot of attitude

Wasn't it atrocious defending from Colwill? Didn't seem lucky - we were just terrible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LAM09 said:

Looks like Guiu could have a problem. Nkunku V Brighton? 🥲

Maybe groin? He stretched his right leg to pick up the pass from Neto in a nice exchange between the two, then dropped to the ground. Looked OK after that, but perhaps he wasn't 100% anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bluesman2610 said:

I’ll take squeaky wins for the remainder of the season if it means we grab top 4 and CL football next season. Won’t be good for my health but hey this is Chelsea we support

100%

Somehow finding a way to steal a win even when we are terrible is something we've been missing for years and years. Glad we're starting to get some. I don't know how we get to Arsenal's level of just repeatedly robbing people in broad daylight but I'm here for it if we can manage it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought the first goal was the result of attacking pressure, but yeah the second was pure luck.

Their goal was a giveway tho, so it's not like they deserved anything better.

Potter back from (Chelsea FC sponsored early) retirement and then relegates WHU?! That'd be fun to watch... 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

Maybe groin? He stretched his right leg to pick up the pass from Neto in a nice exchange between the two, then dropped to the ground. Looked OK after that, but perhaps he wasn't 100% anymore.

The last thing we really need. It could have been a blessing in disguise for him.

I guess we'll find out the full extent tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheHulk said:

A good run of results until Arsenal match could put us in a good position for Top 4.

That is what we said in December before the favourable fixture list and we failed miserably. I can’t trust these players just yet. I wish it was the way you wrote though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mário César said:

I trust the team more away from home than in stamford bridge

I haven't looked careful at our results in dec and jan, but I suspect a strong correlation with opposition quality: we've been struggling against all the good teams lately. A good team does not even need to be in particular good for, e.g. City, because the help with provide (aka errors) is enough for good players to capitalize on.

For example, was it really surprising that Haaland scored from that Sanchez brain fart? Would a lesser striker score that goal too? I doubt it. Actually Halland had an amazing game against us; he came alive in the second half, unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, robsblubot said:

I haven't looked careful at our results in dec and jan, but I suspect a strong correlation with opposition quality: we've been struggling against all the good teams lately. A good team does not even need to be in particular good for, e.g. City, because the help with provide (aka errors) is enough for good players to capitalize on.

For example, was it really surprising that Haaland scored from that Sanchez brain fart? Would a lesser striker score that goal too? I doubt it. Actually Halland had an amazing game against us; he came alive in the second half, unfortunately.

the team play better outside from home because the game is more open, with more space

well, about GK situation, I felt much more relaxed with jorgensen as a gk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You