Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

While I'm sure club would accept it it's pretty clear by now Conor wouldn't even entertain other clubs with negotiating personal terms. And all this to happen in 24h? 

It was reported multiple times he is determined to stay this season. And so far so good. Pochettino likes him, apart from 2 CBs no one played more minutes this season then him. He was captain last night ffs. 

He sucks ass 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Vesper said:

Chelsea seemingly torpedoed Marc Cucurella's loan transfer by playing him in yesterday's Carabao Cup win over AFC Wimbledon.

 

The Sun? C'mon, United finds Cucurella essential to their freaking Carobao Cup campaign? Their own academy will do just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, unless the club pulls off some madness tomorrow it seems like Poch will have the same unwanted problem that Potter had with a bloated squad. Players having to be left completely out of the match day squads, players having to train in different groups etc.

Chalobah picking up that injury really fucked us. He was certain to go and for a sizable fee otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

For Kudus, his only concrete options were Brighton (which he talked himself out of) and West Ham.

I think you mean he asked for a release clause in his contract and Brighton rejected that idea as they want to milk all their assets just like Caicedo. 

 

2 hours ago, bluesman2610 said:

Our fans are way to fickle there is definitely a player in Mudryk we saw it in preseason. He’s short on confidence

He's not short on confidence, its just people expect immediate impact when you spend 60+ million on a player.   There were better options out there for the price we ended up paying for Mudryk.   If he was signed for 30-35 million like Badiashile, there wouldn't be so much noise around him but unfortunately we overpaid and he's nowhere near a 70 million player (probably won't be for 2-3 more seasons). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Vesper said:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/23732857/man-utd-cucurella-transfer-carabao-cup-ten-hag-tottenham/

Chelsea seemingly torpedoed Marc Cucurella's loan transfer by playing him in yesterday's Carabao Cup win over AFC Wimbledon.

 

why the hell did we play that divvy plonker??!!????

Romano already said that United wanted a break clause in January and Chelsea said no to that for Cucurella loan deal.  Why would we agree to bring him back in January?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Chalobah picking up that injury really fucked us. He was certain to go and for a sizable fee otherwise.

Report: Bayern Munich STILL in talks with Chelsea for defender Trevoh Chalobah?

https://www.bavarianfootballworks.com/2023/9/1/23854076/report-bayern-munich-transfer-talks-Chelsea-fc-trevoh-chalobah-loan-benjamin-pavard-palhinha-fulham

Amid earlier reports that Bayern Munich has turned their focus at center-back to Southampton defender and Germany international Armel Bella-Kotchap comes news that the Bavarians are still talking to — and being rebuffed by — Chelsea FC for Trevoh Chalobah.

The 24-year-old Englishman shared time at Stamford Bridge with current Bayern manager Thomas Tuchel, and it appears that Bayern is not ready to give up on the reunion project just yet.

Per Daily Telegraph football news correspondent Matthew Law, via @iMiaSanMia:

Chelsea and Bayern are still talking over Trevoh Chalobah. Neither position has changed yet with Chelsea wanting a sale and Bayern a loan [@Matt_Law_DT]

As confirmed by transfer journalist Fabrizio Romano:

Chelsea have rejected new approach from Bayern for Trevoh Chalobah as it was again on loan deal. ️ #CFC

Conversations continue in order to find a way, nothing sealed or agreed at this stage.

The sticking point appears to be that Bayern’s impending heavy investment in midfield — a €65m offer reportedly on the table for Fulham’s João Palhinha — is leaving no room to spare for a heavy investment at center-back.

It is an interesting prioritization by the Bavarians, who have clearly placed Tuchel’s preference for a defensive profile in central midfield over their need to replace departing right-back/center-back Benjamin Pavard.

How much does Chelsea want? According to Sport Bild, €40-50m. As captured by @iMiaSanMia:

Chelsea want €40-50m for Trevoh Chalobah. Bayern are unwilling to pay that, especially with the money they’re set to spend on Palhinha. Bayern only want a loan. Deal unlikely at the moment, but talks continue towards the final hours of the window [@altobelli13, @cfbayern]

If this deal falls through, Bayern will have to act fast to replace Pavard at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Reddish-Blue said:

Romano already said that United wanted a break clause in January and Chelsea said no to that for Cucurella loan deal.  Why would we agree to bring him back in January?   

I did not see that

makes sense to reject that shit 

FUCK those  Mancs

I hope they choke on a bag of Glazer cocks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Vesper said:

I did not see that

makes sense to reject that shit 

FUCK those  Mancs

I hope they choke on a bag of Glazer cocks

They were also offering a 2m loan fee when Chelsea was looking for 5-8m. And I think board is contemplating selling Maatsen in any case if he doesn't sign a new deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

Chalobah and Humphreys still here and nothing indicates they will leave. Both are extra. 

Cucurella I'm OK with him staying because at least he is backup in 4atb. Clearly Poch is not planning to use Maatsen there. In fact, Maatsen could be sacrificed tomorrow because these deals collapsed and he has 10 months on contract. 

Its only Chalobah Humphreys and Sarr who are extras. None seem to be the kind of characters to kick up a fuss. Chalobah to Bayern is still on so hopefully he goes. And Sarr is talking to Fulham, Forest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Strike said:

Its only Chalobah Humphreys and Sarr who are extras. None seem to be the kind of characters to kick up a fuss. Chalobah to Bayern is still on so hopefully he goes. And Sarr is talking to Fulham, Forest.

In Sarr's case, it would help to get him off the books, saves us 100k a week in wages. 

One of Humphreys/Chalobah are probably fine to stay as we'll need backup at CB throughout the season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You