Chelsea Transfers

[Pizy 18,504]

28 minutes ago, Jas said:

Maybe or he could be overplaying his cards. I mean, he stupidly signed that 6-year contract and gave his future to Levy. 

Have also mentioned before, if you're gonna spend 100m+ on a striker, you would be better off spending it on someone like Haaland. Kane will guarantee instant success because of his age but in terms of long term investment, he makes no sense if someone like Haaland is available. No point spending 100m+ now on a player and then potentially needing to spend big again in 2-3 years time.

Pep strikes me very much like a win now guy. He’s got this unbelievable core of guys now and Kane can make them firm favorites for the next 2-3 years with that core. While for me Haaland is a guaranteed success were he to come to the PL there is still some risk of him needing to adjust like we’ve seen with Timo. If Kane is fit he’s already instantly the best #9 in the league and not a risk at all.

You’ve got to capitalize on the primes of Kdb, Sterling, Walker, Gundogan etc before they start to wane physically. So a shorter term option makes sense. They were after 34 year old Messi last summer, remember. 

[whats happening 1,540]

why would lukaku leave inter? doesnt makes sense.

lewandowski 0% chance. kane maybe 1% chance. haaland, i would give 5-10% chance.

i would be fine with only sancho coming and ziyech/odoi leaving. havertz and werner will only be better next season, im sure.

[Jase 43,479]

30 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Pep strikes me very much like a win now guy. He’s got this unbelievable core of guys now and Kane can make them firm favorites for the next 2-3 years with that core. While for me Haaland is a guaranteed success were he to come to the PL there is still some risk of him needing to adjust like we’ve seen with Timo. If Kane is fit he’s already instantly the best #9 in the league and not a risk at all.

You’ve got to capitalize on the primes of Kdb, Sterling, Walker, Gundogan etc before they start to wane physically. So a shorter term option makes sense. They were after 34 year old Messi last summer, remember. 

You can't compare Kane with Messi because Messi is Messi. 

Guardiola hasn't always bought ready made players and they don't really need Kane to be firm favorites. They are always the favorites anyway and they could potentially win the treble this season pretty much without a striker. 

[Pizy 18,504]

16 minutes ago, Jas said:

You can't compare Kane with Messi because Messi is Messi. 

Guardiola hasn't always bought ready made players and they don't really need Kane to be firm favorites. They are always the favorites anyway and they could potentially win the treble this season pretty much without a striker. 

They won’t be favorites if we beat them in the final and sign Haaland. 😉

[Blues Forever 1,232]

 

[R2D2 368]

 

[chippy 342]

I honestly can't believe we're being linked with Lewondowski. 

I'd even rather have Lukaku, than throw millions at a 33 year old. 

[Pizy 18,504]

11 minutes ago, chippy said:

I honestly can't believe we're being linked with Lewondowski. 

I'd even rather have Lukaku, than throw millions at a 33 year old. 

No serious outlet is linking us with him. And Bayern have already rubbished any thought of him leaving.

But he has just scored like 40 goals this season. Being 33 or not he’d be a mega upgrade in our team.

[chippy 342]

6 minutes ago, Pizy said:

No serious outlet is linking us with him. And Bayern have already rubbished any thought of him leaving.

But he has just scored like 40 goals this season. Being 33 or not he’d be a mega upgrade in our team.

I'd take players of his age on free transfers. 

[Vesper 29,145]

here is a freak of nature to replace Giroud with

2.01m tall (yes, not a typo)

35 goals, 5 assists in 3270 minutes

'The Siege Tower'

Paul Onuachu

[Vesper 29,145]

8 hours ago, Blues Forever said:

 

I rate him, big, pacey, good on the ball

 

[ulvhedin 508]

18 hours ago, whats happening said:

why would lukaku leave inter? doesnt makes sense.

lewandowski 0% chance. kane maybe 1% chance. haaland, i would give 5-10% chance.

i would be fine with only sancho coming and ziyech/odoi leaving. havertz and werner will only be better next season, im sure.

Inter has financial problems and may be forced to do some selling

[Blues Forever 1,232]

3 hours ago, ulvhedin said:

Inter has financial problems and may be forced to do some selling

They just received €275m - €300m loans from Oaktree.

Edited May 21, 2021 by Blues Forever

[ulvhedin 508]

1 hour ago, Blues Forever said:

They just received €275m - €300m loans from Oaktree.

If that's true then personally I don't think they will be willing to sell Lukaku

[ZAPHOD2319 4,538]

 

[Atomiswave 6,072]

15 minutes ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

 

He aint coming here, he has already whored himself to city by saying it would be a dream to play with KDB

[chelsea_4_eva 1,162]

5 minutes ago, Atomiswave said:

He aint coming here, he has already whored himself to city by saying it would be a dream to play with KDB

Yup advantage city... not good for levy if kane only wants city.. as city can lowball levy

[Fernando 6,496]

I think everyone agrees that is not going to happen. 

We should just focus on seeing if Haaland or Mbappe can be bought this summer.