Jump to content

πŸ‡³πŸ‡± Ian Maatsen


NikkiCFC
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 24/05/2024 at 13:56, OneMoSalah said:

Its pure profit regardless so if it’s 20-25m euros I’d think we will take it. I don’t think hes particularly excelled over in Germany either (despite the usual player X goes on loan, has 2 or 3 good games and everyone complains β€œwhy didn’t he get used here!?”) so they have probably got the advantage knowing we already tried offloading him in the summer.

I think we will either get the Β£35m or close to it. If BVB don't pay it there will be a couple of PL clubs who would be happy to take him on considering his HG status and relatively low wages.Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First we should find out who will be our manager, don't we? Chillwell, Cucurella and Maatsen are very different type of left backs, and we can make income on the other two too.

Β 

Also, if Kompany joins Bayern - where Fonzie is likely to leave - it can be obvious choice aswell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/05/2024 at 13:50, nyikolajevics said:

First we should find out who will be our manager, don't we? Chillwell, Cucurella and Maatsen are very different type of left backs, and we can make income on the other two too.

Β 

Also, if Kompany joins Bayern - where Fonzie is likely to leave - it can be obvious choice aswell.

The club won't care. Maatsen will be gone due to FFP capital he creates. If they decide to get a new LB the only question then would be Chilwell v Cucu.Β 

This is the same with Gallagher and Trev, and those two are two of our better players.Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Β 

6 minutes ago, King Kante said:

The club won't care. Maatsen will be gone due to FFP capital he creates. If they decide to get a new LB the only question then would be Chilwell v Cucu.Β 

This is the same with Gallagher and Trev, and those two are two of our better players.Β 

It’s crazy because I believe all 3 could be very useful in our new system but we spent so much in average players and haven’t back that by hitting top 4 that we now have to sell them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, King Kante said:

The club won't care. Maatsen will be gone due to FFP capital he creates. .Β 

But that's the point.. Cucu and Chilwell would be also easy to sell if we want to raise funds.

However it's intresting you announce it like it was an objective fact, not a speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nyikolajevics said:

But that's the point.. Cucu and Chilwell would be also easy to sell if we want to raise funds.

However it's intresting you announce it like it was an objective fact, not a speculation.

It's not about been easy to sell.... What ever we get for maatsen is 100% pure profitΒ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
38 minutes ago, Strike said:

Only got it because of the overpriced Omari Kellyman deal.Β 

Kellyman fee can be spread out over the length of his contract 3m per year making the Maatsen fee 34.5m for this year still a great deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...