Jump to content

Edin Dzeko


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Jason said:

As some have alluded to, had we gotten Dzeko 4-5 years ago, it would have been an excellent signing. Not too sure about now but he should be a decent back up.

Am curious about one thing though. He is the first choice striker at Roma but he's willing to leave that to join us, where he may potentially be second choice? Or has he been promised regular game time?

I think he’s coming as second choice. I think Roma we’re looking to sell him in the summer (they have Schick now) but realised that they’ll get more money in January for him. Given that, at about £20m it’s a decent transfer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 590
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Everything but fee and his inability to play in CL is perfect about this transfer.

But I guess january brings extra 5-10m on table, so its not awful.

I was hoping we bring Etoo esque striker and he is exactly that. Experienced, proven, but still quality player. He will be good competition for Morata, and wont hinder Tammy progress. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Blusan Alamb said:

It will be interesting to see the length of contract Dzeko gets. As far as I know, we have a very strict rule regarding 30+ players. Our board even refused to give a contract to our legends for more than one year when they were above 30.

I swear Lampard, JT and Drogba all got big contracts at around that age? I think the reason they weren't offered longer one's post 2010 was more down to the fact they weren't that good anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Tomo said:

I think the reason they weren't offered longer one's post 2010 was more down to the fact they weren't that good anymore.

I think we should add compared to their best. Lamps I thimk scored 8 his last season and helped Shitty (scoring against us ffs - sadness) with another 8 goals the next. Same with Drogs. Think he had 12/13 didn't he? Tho I was upset we brought him back cause I suspected he wouldn't be at his best  But think he still had 8 ishhh?

But I think our 30 rule is outdated. It should be purely on an individual basis. Top players now stay fit into their 30s and depending on them are as fit as ever. Soecially it seems defenders. Most top defenders round the world are 30+.

So Id have no qualms of giving him 2/3 years.

I dont watch European football as a rule but my eyes will be watching Inter v Roma tonight to see how/IF those 2 play!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Unionjack said:

I think we should add compared to their best. Lamps I thimk scored 8 his last season and helped Shitty (scoring against us ffs - sadness) with another 8 goals the next. Same with Drogs. Think he had 12/13 didn't he? Tho I was upset we brought him back cause I suspected he wouldn't be at his best  But think he still had 8 ishhh?

But I think our 30 rule is outdated. It should be purely on an individual basis. Top players now stay fit into their 30s and depending on them are as fit as ever. Soecially it seems defenders. Most top defenders round the world are 30+.

So Id have no qualms of giving him 2/3 years.

I dont watch European football as a rule but my eyes will be watching Inter v Roma tonight to see how/IF those 2 play!!

Surely they wont play if they are coming here. Injures etc 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Unionjack said:

I thought all that was to be sorted were the 'add ons' which took it to 60mill euros?

Don’t know where the guardian got their £13.4m fee from. That suggests add one of about 20m euros, which hasn’t been reported anywhere else. Seems like they maybe got their figures wrong. We’ll find out a more precise figure soon I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You