KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 4 matches is a decent result. This means he won't play against Arsenal. Wonder how that will work out. I think Cahill is a very good defender and more than adequate replacement and has more pace than Terry. However we could miss his leadership and organisational skills. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Nasty feeling because of the Suarez thing it'll be a minimum 4 game ban -on the positive be available to play the goons, and I hope he appeals -and sues the fuckers come to thatHe should Sue the FA. FA bent their own rules to take JT Down in this case. Didnt the panel of Judges consist of the ones chosen by FA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superblue 6,372 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary/NewsAndFeatures/2012/john-terry-hearing-result-september.aspxMake of that what you wish. Not once in my life have I fully understood a text regarding law or court Yep sounds like he'll be available for Arsenal! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Chelsea Football Club notes and respects today's decision by the Football Association regarding John Terry.We also recognise that John has the right to appeal that decision.It is therefore inappropriate for us to comment further on the matter at this timehttp://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/2931820/title/statement-on-terry-hearing-result Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leif 6,006 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 John Terry has been found INNOCENT in a court of law.John Terry has been found GUILTY by the F.A.He will be banned for FOUR games, which is only ONE game more than a regular red card. Laughable. (Of course there's the fine too.)The FA are an embarrassment. If you're going to go against the law's decision and decide someone's guilty (wrongly, in my opinion) in your eyes for racism or a racist remark, at least make the punishment a bit more than that. Otherwise there shouldn't be punishment at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Sky Sports say suspension starts immediately meaning he'll miss Arsenal game without appeal. Dunno may just be reading it wrong?!Should he accept the charges by tomorrow(I think), he will then miss games against:Arsenal(A)Norwich(H)Tottenham(A)Man United(H)If he decides to appeal(thus postponing the ban) and still found guilty(!), then he will miss games against:Norwich(H)Tottenham(A)Man United(H)Man United(H - League Cup)Not much of a difference there. And there are 2 CL matches in between - Nordsjaelland(A) and Shakhtar(A). Likely to play in both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chelsea maniac 40 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 4 matches is a decent result. This means he won't play against Arsenal. Wonder how that will work out. I think Cahill is a very good defender and more than adequate replacement and has more pace than Terry. However we could miss his leadership and organisational skills.Yes he will play against Arsenal he has 14 days to make an appeal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Yes he will play against Arsenal he has 14 days to make an appealAh OK Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 I think his best option is to wait till after the Arsenal match and accept the charge. He would miss Norwich, Tottenham, and utd both in the PL and League Cup. An appeal could see the ban increased, although I highly doubt it, the verdict was obviously arranged well before the hearing started. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superblue 6,372 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Should he accept the charges by tomorrow(I think), he will then miss games against:Arsenal(A)Norwich(H)Tottenham(A)Man United(H)If he decides to appeal(thus postponing the ban) and still found guilty(!), then he will miss games against:Norwich(H)Tottenham(A)Man United(H)Man United(H - League Cup)Not much of a difference there. And there are 2 CL matches in between - Nordsjaelland(A) and Shakhtar(A). Likely to play in both.Better to take the second option and use a game in the league cup. My only worry is judging on what has already taken place in this witch-hunt, if he appeals he'll probably get banned longer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slam Dunk 1,442 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 He may as well accept it (after Saturday), it won't get much better for him to be honest. The FA have got what they wanted, he's quit the national team and they still look like the good guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluesChick 1,260 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 SIGH! Well, I'm not surprised and I hope we appeal but if we do can they lengthen the ban? if so then I don't want to JT to appeal, because you know they will slap him with every thing they've got if he does and loses the appeal. I really dislike the FA …. I'm too much of a lady to say all the really bad words I want to say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porthos 35 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Cleared by court of law and yet suspendedRoman should send in the legal eagles & take the FA to a real court & tear them down once and for all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 take the ban and move on ,,,,he is never going to win an appeal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky 301 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Guilty of "misconduct", nicely worded by the FA, guess they had to cover themselves against any future legal implications. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beigl 1,387 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 He should appeal and look what´s happening.He was cleared by court and got suspended,absolutely disgrace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beigl 1,387 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 FA=Ferdinand Association Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Well, at least we're guaranteed two matches with Terry at his absolute best. This weekend and when his ban is over.Amazing how good he is facing adversity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EskWeston 696 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Guilty of "misconduct", nicely worded by the FA, guess they had to cover themselves against any future legal implications.Well yes but they have also said this:"The Football Association charged Mr Terry on Friday 27 July 2012 with using abusive and/or insulting words and/or behaviour towards Queens Park Rangers’ Anton Ferdinand and which included a reference to colour and/or race contrary to FA Rule E3[2] in relation to the Queens Park Rangers FC versus Chelsea FC fixture at Loftus Road on 23 October 2011."The fact that they have said "towards" AF means that they are accusing him of actually saying the words at Ferdinand, which a court cleared JT of. I thought the only reason they were able to even have a hearing was because they will charge with using abusive language full stop? I guess we will have to wait for the full judgement though. But the way they have worded this initial statement certainly makes it should as though they have accused him of racially abusing Ferdinand. Obviously they will let that fester among the media and once he has been hung, drawn and quartered will they come out and say that he was actually charged with just using the words on the football pitch.Don't know why if they have decided to announce him being charged they should at least announce fully what he has been charged of doing..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 John Brewin from ESPN has said that JT will appeal the ban. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.