Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Radamel Falcao

BlueLion.

By BlueLion.,
in Strikers

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

lionsden
lionsden

People will try to justify and get excited over anything. We could sign a balloon and some people will be like "that balloon once scored for sunderland against liverpool, it will return to form.

Madmax
Madmax

All that stuff by Mourinho about earning your time on the pitch - never a bigger indictment of it as total BS than having Falcao get more minutes over Remy.

Special Juan
Special Juan

I'm more worried about players like Ramires who can't pass a ball than Falcao.

Posted Images

Whiskey

Whiskey 173

Posted
Posted

20m loan? Seal that and we'll look like PSG.

We could get Destro for that exact fee.

20m for the best pure striker in the world for 2 seasons.

I dont care because its not my money and it doesnt affect me in any way what so ever. Chelsea has the money, and dont even mention FFP please.

We would have the best force of strikers in the world, and that was a while ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AK-3001

AK-3001 286

Posted
Posted

20m loan? Seal that and we'll look like PSG.

We could get Destro for that exact fee.

I don't care if we look like PSG or not. We are in profits if we look at our summer dealings. As long as we get goalscorers who are proven, it does not matter to me. Though a 20 million loan sounds like a little too much, it won't be a big hit financially, especially with Torres leaving (looks like it) now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sidzeret

Sidzeret 2,257

Posted
Posted

20m for the best pure striker in the world for 2 seasons.

I dont care because its not my money and it doesnt affect me in any way what so ever. Chelsea has the money, and dont even mention FFP please.

We would have the best force of strikers in the world, and that was a while ago.

Oh, 2 seasons. I thought it was just one. I'd like that then :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hostedenis

Hostedenis 556

Posted
Posted

20m for the best pure striker in the world for 2 seasons.

I dont care because its not my money and it doesnt affect me in any way what so ever. Chelsea has the money, and dont even mention FFP please.

We would have the best force of strikers in the world, and that was a while ago.

Is this guy serious? :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hostedenis

Hostedenis 556

Posted
Posted

If you're gonna post dumbass posts, then dont.

Say something constructive instead of some lameass one-liner.

What part of my post do you consider "unserious"?

This part:

20m for the best pure striker in the world for 2 seasons.

I dont care because its not my money and it doesnt affect me in any way what so ever. Chelsea has the money, and dont even mention FFP please.

We would have the best force of strikers in the world, and that was a while ago.

That's right, all of it.

First of all, we wouldn't be paying 20m for the best pure striker in the world. No, we'd be paying for a loan and wouldn't own him. And he's not the best pure striker in the world. Top 5 definitely, top 3 most likely. But hasn't shown the same greatness after his injury (not saying he lost some of it but he could have but that's another discussion).

Second, if you don't care about the clubs money and how they invest it on new players, because it doesn't affect you, you're not a fan. Of course it affects you, because you are a fan and you want the club to get the best players. If they'd just toss the money around, they'd have less money to spend and would maybe get that one crazy player but wouldn't be able to get a good overall balanced squad like we have now. We've had a great transfer window this summer and the club has done some excellent business and they've done so because they've invested wisely. 32m for Costa, selling Mata and Luiz for 40m and 50m, great! Getting rid of Torres and saving money that way: great! Getting rid of the high wages of Lampard and Cole, is great business even though I'll miss them (especially Lamps)! And Fabregas was great business as well. A 20million loan is not. It's terrible business. Even for a player as great as Falcao. And how would that work with Costa? We're a one striker team, you know?

Chelsea has the money, but they don't have infinite money. You do know that, right? And FFP is something to keep in mind, altough I'm not allowed by you to mention it so I won't go into it.

And last but not least, we wouldn't have the best strike force in the world. We'd have two great strikers, but would they play together? If you have two strikers of that caliber they should, but we'll probably still play with two (or in one striker team) three AM's. We'd have a great LW in Hazard but our 10 position or RW can still use some improvement. Nowhere near the strike force of Real Madrid or Bayern...

I'm sorry I had to type it out for you, I thought you'd get it with just my one-liner but I'll try to be more clear next time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iseah100

iseah100 5,612

Posted
Posted

If you're gonna post dumbass posts, then dont.

Say something constructive instead of some lameass one-liner.

What part of my post do you consider "unserious"?

Whoaaaa, man. Relax.

He said are you serious because it's stupid to not care about the clubs finances at all. Obviously it's not your money, but look at Torres. That wasn't your money, but the club wasted so much money on him.

No it's just one season. £20m = loan fee + wages for one season. Then there would be an option to buy him at the end of the 1-year loan spell for £40m.

That's not too bad. An option, if he doesn't perform at a world class level we could just not buy him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AK-3001

AK-3001 286

Posted
Posted

This part:

That's right, all of it.

First of all, we wouldn't be paying 20m for the best pure striker in the world. No, we'd be paying for a loan and wouldn't own him. And he's not the best pure striker in the world. Top 5 definitely, top 3 most likely. But hasn't shown the same greatness after his injury (not saying he lost some of it but he could have but that's another discussion).

Second, if you don't care about the clubs money and how they invest it on new players, because it doesn't affect you, you're not a fan. Of course it affects you, because you are a fan and you want the club to get the best players. If they'd just tossed the money around, they'd have less money to spend and would maybe get that one crazy player but wouldn't be able to get a good overall balanced squad like we have now. We've had a great transfer window this summer and the club has done some excellent business and they've done so because they've invested wisely. 32m for Costa, selling Mata and Luiz for 40m and 50m, great! Getting rid of Torres and saving money that way: great! And Fabregas was a great buy as well. A 20million loan is not. It's terrible business. Even for a player as great as Falcao. And how would that work with Costa? We're a one striker team, you know?

Chelsea has the money, but they don't have infinite money. You do know that, right? And FFP is something to keep in mind, altough I'm not allowed by you to mention it so I won't go into it.

And last but not least, we wouldn't have the best strike force in the world. We'd have two great strikers, but would they play together? If you have two strikers of that caliber they should, but we'll probably still play with two (or in one striker team) three AM's. We'd have a great LW in Hazard but our 10 position or RW can still use some improvement. Nowhere near the strike force of Real Madrid or Bayern...

I'm sorry I had to type it out for you, I thought you'd get it with just my one-liner but I'll try to be more clear next time.

Nice comment there.

Though when i think about Destro, frankly, I never heard his name before we got linked with him. I am not sure how he plays, the stats look very good, 0.95 goals per game without any penalties? Is it? Sounds pretty good, though we have seen how the strikers from Italy play in the Premier League. Shevchenko comes to mind instantly.

We can say that Falcao is better than Destro atm, though I trust Mourinho, he knows what he's doing. If he's selling Torres, then he already has someone in his mind lined up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iseah100

iseah100 5,612

Posted
Posted

We can say that Falcao is better than Destro atm, though I trust Mourinho, he knows what he's doing. If he's selling Torres, then he already has someone in his mind lined up.

Falcao is 28 and expensive as fuck. Destro is 24 and relatively cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter