Henrique 9,133 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Almost would have believed it if there wasn't a RVP to Real part. Now I am convinced it's BSThere is no RVP to real, he just said the dutch man is a target. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanishBlue 426 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Yeah, the sturridge deal would be good business for Chelsea. I just think that it would be a bad move not to sell Torres if we want to sign Falcao.Torres is making too many complaints when he is not playing and he has a bad effect on the team like last year with Drogba. It wont be healthy for our team if we keep Torres and sign Falcao. Besides, he is too expensive in wages so the best move is to sell him if we sign Falcao. That's the only wise move imo.Edit: otherwise we should play them both at the same time like RvP and Rooney.At least they both speak spanish, so Torres can't use the language as an excuse It would be sexy in Fifa 13 though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,570 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Please, Please, Please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 18,896 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 I'd give my right nut for this to be true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leif 6,006 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Look at the amount of posts in the Sturridge thread and this one. Cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corner 456 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Look at the amount of posts in the Sturridge thread and this one. Cool.It was cool until you made this comment and unbalanced it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutcho 8,443 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Hopefully if its as done as people say it is, then more info should start to leak and then the ball will start to roll on. Still will switch off my laptop and wake up tommorrow and hope to read some positive encouraging news....TORRES SIGNS NEW 5 YEAR DEAL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutcho 8,443 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 I'd give my right nut for this to be true.So you hold your left nut in higher regard... Interesting, i am sure @leif will have something to say about that as he loves this sort of thing... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Putting all our eggs in one basket again, while paying near £50million for a striker while letting another leave. He'll be a flop. Chelsea never, ever, learn.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corner 456 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Putting all our eggs in one basket again, while paying near £50million for a striker while letting another leave. He'll be a flop. Chelsea never, ever, learn..You can't just guarantee Falcao will be a flop. It would be silly if Chelsea never took a risk again just because of what happened with Torres. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 You can't just guarantee Falcao will be a flop. It would be silly if Chelsea never took a risk again just because of what happened with Torres.All I'm saying is, we've gambled big on this position twice and been burnt twice. It makes more sense to find the Falcao's of tomorrow ourselves and pay a fraction less. The most logical thing is to buy several strikers and have them compete for this position. Instead we're selling the one who could've done that, keeping the waste of space who's a challenge to no-one and not having a plan B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanishBlue 426 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 And he turns 27 in february btw... I want a striker in the age bracket 23-25 :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 All I'm saying is, we've gambled big on this position twice and been burnt twice. It makes more sense to find the Falcao's of tomorrow ourselves and pay a fraction less. The most logical thing is to buy several strikers and have them compete for this position. Instead we're selling the one who could've done that, keeping the waste of space who's a challenge to no-one and not having a plan B. I agree with the highlighted part but the situation with Falcao is different to with Sheva and Torres.Sheva has already built a legacy, he was past his best and Milan fleeced us for £30m. Torres was crap for 6 months prior to his arrival, the mistake we made was thinking it was because he was getting bored of life in Liverpool and needing a new challenge (well that and not doing a proper medical on him).I agree that we should look out for the 'next Falcao' ourself's but i really can't see how he will flop, like with RVP he has too much quality and confidence for that to happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corner 456 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 All I'm saying is, we've gambled big on this position twice and been burnt twice. It makes more sense to find the Falcao's of tomorrow ourselves and pay a fraction less. The most logical thing is to buy several strikers and have them compete for this position. Instead we're selling the one who could've done that, keeping the waste of space who's a challenge to no-one and not having a plan B. True. But you have to understand that Sturridge wants to be playing regularly as a CF, and that's just not something the Chelsea board are willing to offer him. I'm not faulting Sturridge's ambition, but I'm also not faulting the board for attempting to sign Falcao. It seems to be the best deal for both Chelsea and Sturridge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 I agree with the highlighted part but the situation with Falcao is different to with Sheva and Torres.Sheva has already built a legacy, he was past his best and Milan fleeced us for £30m. Torres was crap for 6 months prior to his arrival, the mistake we made was thinking it was because he was getting bored of life in Liverpool and needing a new challenge (well that and not doing a proper medical on him).I agree that we should look out for the 'next Falcao' ourself's but i really can't see how he will flop, like with RVP he has too much quality and confidence for that to happen.Okay fair point. But then there's factoring in pressure, adaptation, will our style even suit what Flacao is used to getting at Athletico. Just because he's on fire now, doesn't mean he will for us. If he doesn't get off to a burning start off the bat, his own confidence will shake, we'll have no plan B, and stuck in the mud again.True. But you have to understand that Sturridge wants to be playing regularly as a CF, and that's just not something the Chelsea board are willing to offer him. I'm not faulting Sturridge's ambition, but I'm also not faulting the board for attempting to sign Falcao. It seems to be the best deal for both Chelsea and Sturridge.This is true. However I don't consider this a good deal because it's a ridiculous amount of money and most are expecting he's the answer to getting us goals. We're going to pay a hideous amount because the board is short-sighted and they're going to continue to be short-sighted when we're losing talents like Sturridge, just like Borini just like Miroslav Stoch. Watch how we waste Islam Feruz too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.