Jump to content

Antonio Candreva


 Share

Recommended Posts

At a time when so many clubs are buying, using, and having great success with younger players it's sort of weird/concerning that we're being linked with older (in football terms, obviously) players.

Surely instead of going for Lichtsteiner who will turn 33 halfway through the season and Candreva who will turn 30 halfway through the season, we should be targeting much younger and better players who can give us years of quality service? Players who have room for improvement and aren't already declining or at their peak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

His game against Belgium, playing as right midfielder, was absolutely beastly. I didn't know that he fits that good in that role. If Antonio wants to play with 3 - 4 - 3, or 3 - 5 -2 system, why not?.

Obviously for a good price.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, illmatic said:

His game against Belgium, playing as right midfielder, was absolutely beastly. I didn't know that he fits that good in that role. If Antonio wants to play with 3 - 4 - 3, or 3 - 5 -2 system, why not?.

Obviously for a good price.
 

http://www.football-italia.net/85869/lotito-raises-candreva-price

Apparently Lazio want 30 million euros for him

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/4/2016 at 9:11 AM, Pizy said:

At a time when so many clubs are buying, using, and having great success with younger players it's sort of weird/concerning that we're being linked with older (in football terms, obviously) players.

Surely instead of going for Lichtsteiner who will turn 33 halfway through the season and Candreva who will turn 30 halfway through the season, we should be targeting much younger and better players who can give us years of quality service? Players who have room for improvement and aren't already declining or at their peak.

nothing wrong with acquiring a vet who understands how Conte wants to play. ESPECIALLY since we'll have an abbreviated training camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What we do with him though? One winger must surely be on his way out if we're bidding for him.
Unless we're going to use him as RB :lol: Vast improvement over Ivanovic.
I'm confused.

Maybe him, Hazard or Willian will play as the number 10. But then that would mean we're going to keep using the 4-2-3-1 and I really don't even want to think about it.
Unless we're going to use a 4-4-2 Diamond. Interesting idea.
If it's a winger for a winger I hope it's Pedro who goes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Blue_Fox_ said:

What we do with him though? One winger must surely be on his way out if we're bidding for him.
Unless we're going to use him as RB :lol: Vast improvement over Ivanovic.
I'm confused.

Maybe him, Hazard or Willian will play as the number 10. But then that would mean we're going to keep using the 4-2-3-1 and I really don't even want to think about it.
Unless we're going to use a 4-4-2 Diamond. Interesting idea.
If it's a winger for a winger I hope it's Pedro who goes.

 

We don't even know what shape Conte wants to play. The thing I like about Candreva is he can play a variety of roles for the team, very good squad player. And he puts in a decent cross!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You