Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Juan Cuadrado

Liuxas

By Liuxas,
in Midfielders

 Share

Recommended Posts

LAM09

LAM09 6,744

Posted
Posted
We already have Musonda who is worth a shot.

Maybe he is more talented than Coman.

Of course we should cut ties with Cuadrado, golden, opportunity to get rid.

One of the worst 30 mio. pounds players in recent history in England, never forget that!

If Conte is appointed, he's getting recalled. Just hope that means Pedro is off

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Pizy

Pizy 18,368

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

If Conte is appointed, he's getting recalled. Just hope that means Pedro is off

I'd much rather have Pedro than Cuadrado. 

Oh, and I see you're a GAF poster...:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Essien19

Essien19 1,415

Posted
Posted
If Conte is appointed, he's getting recalled. Just hope that means Pedro is off

For me it's not inevitable to happen, the rumours were in the media a long time ago. But perhaps we'll find out soon enough.

I would rather have Pedro around than Cuadrado, but if it's Cuadrado who has to stay, i can agree to let Pedro off the hook.

Most importantly is for me to bring Musonda home again. [emoji4]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chelseafan26

chelseafan26 293

Posted
Posted

How is pedro better than cuadrado?

Juan came to a team which was set in its ways. We were going to play Hazard-oscar-willian under jose until one of them dropped dead. And in case someone did drop dead, we played Hazard-cesc-willian with a pivot of rambo/mikel-matic.

How can anyone label cuadrado the worst buy after 311 minutes of PL action is beyond me. Whats worse is that these 311 minutes happened over the course of 12 games, which means he got 25 minutes per game. And as far as I remember, most of these appearances were when we were a slender lead ahead and needed to defend for our lives.

On the other hand we have a headless chicken in pedro who has had a WHOLE season with us and has done nothing. Cant dribble, finishing is pathetic. And while we are on the subject, I would rather take Moses over Pedro next season. Dont people realise how utterly shit shit Pedro has been. He has failed to be called even average in a season where we are 10th.

Also, for his "good form" before injury, it was against the worst teams in the league. So lets not exaggerate. Put in Moses/Cuadrado/Musonda against Newcastle and the way they defended that day and each of them would get a brace too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tomo

Tomo 21,733

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, chelseafan26 said:

How is pedro better than cuadrado?

Juan came to a team which was set in its ways. We were going to play Hazard-oscar-willian under jose until one of them dropped dead. And in case someone did drop dead, we played Hazard-cesc-willian with a pivot of rambo/mikel-matic.

How can anyone label cuadrado the worst buy after 311 minutes of PL action is beyond me. Whats worse is that these 311 minutes happened over the course of 12 games, which means he got 25 minutes per game. And as far as I remember, most of these appearances were when we were a slender lead ahead and needed to defend for our lives.

On the other hand we have a headless chicken in pedro who has had a WHOLE season with us and has done nothing. Cant dribble, finishing is pathetic. And while we are on the subject, I would rather take Moses over Pedro next season. Dont people realise how utterly shit shit Pedro has been. He has failed to be called even average in a season where we are 10th.

Also, for his "good form" before injury, it was against the worst teams in the league. So lets not exaggerate. Put in Moses/Cuadrado/Musonda against Newcastle and the way they defended that day and each of them would get a brace too.

1. Villa are the worst team in the league.

2. Newcastlemay be down near the bottom but they won at White Hart Lane, drew at Old Trafford and outplayed Arsenal at The Emirates and were desperately unlucky to lose.

While we should be beating Newcastle at home, as those results/performances above show it still ain't the type of team we can just best by turning up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlueLion.

BlueLion. 21,491

Posted
Posted

Might as well keep him. Lightweight, yes, but a decent squad option who can provide cover across the three attacking midfield positions, and at RB at a push. Deserves a shot, a proper shot, at least. 336 minutes under Mourinho isn't enough to judge him fairly by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kellzfresh

kellzfresh 7,229

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Stats said:

4-2-3-1. Muller plays behind Lewa. Options on wing are only Costa, Ribery, Robben and Coman. Robben will be injured 3/4 of the season anyway and is getting on as is Ribery. I don't think he will have any interest in joining us.

You forgot about gotze. I know Ancelloti doesn't rotate as much as Guardiola so we'll see how this plays out next season. 

But the general point I was trying to make was we can still sign top players. As long as we have a top coach who will make the call to convince the player, it's possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter