Jump to content

Juan Cuadrado


Liuxas
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There's a lot of posts on this thread about his dribbling, so i decided to check Chances Created so far this season, and compare to our AM's (feel free to check more reliable sources)

Schurrle 0.4 created a game.

Hazard 2.6

Willian 1.0

Oscar 1.6

Cuadrado 2.1

- We all know CC stats can be a bit misleading, but it does give you an idea. For example, no one can argue Schurrle is a player who creates many chances for others.

They might be attacking midfielders but they are different kind of attacking midfielders, playing different roles within a system. So, that stat is definitely misleading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of all rationales and weighing of arguments, i deeply feel this guy will make our right flank work. In an exciting manner as well.

We were a bit sterile on that flank imo and Cuadrado does inject directness, taking on a man, going deep, making penetrating runs....

I'm sold :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of all rationales and weighing of arguments, i deeply feel this guy will make our right flank work. In an exciting manner as well.

We were a bit sterile on that flank imo and Cuadrado does inject directness, taking on a man, going deep, making penetrating runs....

I'm sold :-)

we live in hope RW hasnt been sorted since we had Robben and Duff to interchange

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give him a chance alright, despite not believing him much, but you convinced me he isn't a lost cause as much as Willian is (scoring and assisting wise).

When I meant he's worse than Schurrle I didn't mean as a player, but a fitting player in the system. In theory Schurrle was exactly the kind of player we needed, but his inconsistency and lately his illness and the aftermath of that were a big downfall, but still I think we needed a player that was goal-directed. Hazard isn't much yet, Oscar has too many off days and Willian doesn't deserve a comment on his goal scoring ability. So someone fast, with simple and direct approach, seeking the goal and making runs behind the defense is exactly what we need with one dribble already in the team, a slow #10 in pace (Cesc) and a slow #10 in outcomes (Oscar).

If we keep slowing down our attack one way (dribbles) or the other (slowness, passiveness), it will only get worse. Of course, many times dribbles don't slow down the attack but they can't compare to a player running down the channels and presenting himself in a direct way to score a goal.

A good team is a mix of different things that brings some balance, I swear I don't get why you guys want a RW that is a dribbler, a #10 that is a dribbler and a striker that is a dribbler (reading Willian's, Cesc's, Oscar's and Costa's critics that's the main idea you get about dribbles, take ons, hold up and link up play). The lack of balance today is that Hazard has to produce creatively for all the AMs, as we can't count consistently on Oscar because we never know which version of him will show up and Willian's contribution on posts is actually higher than his contribution on goals and assists - literally. So instead of finding someone that would give us the same as Schurrle, except more consistently, we have a mix of Hazard and Willian. I'm not convinced it will work, but I'm less convinced he'll be a Willian. That's as much progress I can make about him unless he makes a Costa here - or a Fabregas - and scores and/or assists in an incredible rate right from the go. Until then, I still feel that while not being as bad as I initially thought, he isn't the answer to our problems and may make our side even less balanced, slowing down the play even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They might be attacking midfielders but they are different kind of attacking midfielders, playing different roles within a system. So, that stat is definitely misleading.

Yeah I know, but that was more to prove he's not just a player who dribbles all game. And I included our players to see how his numbers stack up, not as a straight comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cuadrado's mother: "My son always liked football, since he was very small" #CFC (via @CaracaolDeportes)

Cuadrado's mother: "My son when he was small, was a forward, top scorer and then changed to another position" #CFC (via @CaracolDeportes)

Cuadrado's mother: "The first gift from my son was when he told me that he would fix my house" #CFC (via @CaracolDeportes) ...Signed a gem.

Cuadrado's mother: "God you had saved this award from Chelsea for his effort" #CFC (via @CaracolDeportes)

Juan Cuadrado was just FOUR when he hid under the bed as gunmen murdered his father. #CFC (Mirror)

Cuadrado's mother: "Perhaps the death of his dad made him grow up quicker.” #CFC (Mirror)

Cuadrado's mother on whether her son at that point would give up dream of playing: "No, he was persistent and even more. Never give up" #CFC

--

Holy shit, that third last tweet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was precisely my point - cuadrado was a pacey player in a slow league.

That might be the case, but I personally think defences are better in Italy (on the whole).

Willian's stats (whatever they were) shouldn't be taken into any consideration. The Ukraine league is a walk in the park for Shakhtar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You