Rumoured Ezequiel Lavezzi

[BlueLion. 21,491]

whats the problem with a short term/stop gap signing. we have hazard-oscar-willian-cesc as the long term (atleast foreseeable future) players. if we indeed get an offer for schurrle (30mil euros) then an 8mil deal for lavezzi who is not only better than schurrle but even better than our current first team starter in willian, then i seriously dont see a problem.

(all this is only after we have gone all in for reus and cant get him).

Salah is obviously leaving, Schurrle is inconsistent beyond belief and Willian doesn't set the world alight all the while. Lavezzi would be a cracking option for a couple of years/or if we eventually sign Reus.

[Jase 43,479]

whats the problem with a short term/stop gap signing. we have hazard-oscar-willian-cesc as the long term (atleast foreseeable future) players. if we indeed get an offer for schurrle (30mil euros) then an 8mil deal for lavezzi who is not only better than schurrle but even better than our current first team starter in willian, then i seriously dont see a problem.

(all this is only after we have gone all in for reus and cant get him).

If we are gonna get a short term/stop gap signing, then get someone good or decent. But would Lavezzi improve us? Not in my books.

[Special Juan 28,091]

If we are gonna get a short term/stop gap signing, then get someone good or decent. But would Lavezzi improve us? Not in my books.

Lavezzi would be an upgrade on both Willian and Schurrle.

[ILoveLamp 270]

Over-rated player. Inconsistent, and NOT an upgrade on Willian or Schurrle in my opinion.

No thanks.

[didierforever 7,349]

If we are gonna get a short term/stop gap signing, then get someone good or decent. But would Lavezzi improve us? Not in my books.

Lavezzi is a good option, probably the best available to us right now after reus. And his price tag is in single digit which is pretty good deal.

In my opinion, he is a better option than either of willian and schurrle. He is a work horse so fits rigjt in with jose's philosophy and definitelt more direct and a better dribbler than willian.

[Jase 43,479]

Lavezzi is a good option, probably the best available to us right now after reus. And his price tag is in single digit which is pretty good deal.

Didn't know Lavezzi only cost £8 and not £8, 000, 000.

In my opinion, he is a better option than either of willian and schurrle. He is a work horse so fits rigjt in with jose's philosophy and definitelt more direct and a better dribbler than willian.

He may be all that but his form and performances in the last couple of years have not convinced me that he'll be a good buy.

[Jase 43,479]

Lavezzi would be an upgrade on both Willian and Schurrle.

Have people been watching the wrong Lavezzi? If the current Lavezzi is still the Lavezzi of Napoli, then I would probably agree with that. But right now, he's not even playing well and has hardly set the world alight at PSG. An upgrade? Not a chance. If anything, they are all almost similar in their limitation and inconsistency.

[Spike 12,049]

Didn't know Lavezzi only cost £8 and not £8, 000, 000.

He may be all that but his form and performances in the last couple of years have not convinced me that he'll be a good buy.

You are so devoid of humour it makes my bones ache. The least funniest staff member strikes again.

- Spike out.

[DYC. 7,542]

Decent player at this level at best. A couple of fine performances against Chelsea years back doesn't change that. He's not an upgrade on the current options, so a no for me.

[Jase 43,479]

You are so devoid of humour it makes my bones ache. The least funniest staff member strikes again.

- Spike out.

Good to know...

[Spike 12,049]

Good to know...

You love the attention.

[iseah100 5,612]

Not better than Shirley

[The Skipper 20,609]

This would be a pathetic signing tbh.

[LAB 1,030]

No need for Lavezzi. Willian is better in my opinion. He is quite old too.

[Polo7 3,496]

No need for Lavezzi. Willian is better in my opinion. He is quite old too.

And when Willian is either injured or being rested we have.....?