👕 Chelsea Kits Thread

[Chelsea4 1,521]

 

[FabHazard 655]

2 minutes ago, xPetrCechx said:

Nah...

i would not mind having UA as sponsor as long as we are getting more money

[Vytis33 1,162]

Bring on the Swoosh!

[Beigl 1,387]

i would not mind having UA as sponsor as long as we are getting more money

I would prefer Puma over Under Amour. I mean the brand isn't bad and their sport shirts are quality, but I think they suit 'smaller' teams like Spurs better.

[the wes 7,212]

Doesn't it matter whos the new sponsor deal is if they pay huge money for it I don't care who it is  

[We Hate Scouse 10,286]

Under Armour were the other brand to pitch to the board. Not sure if there has been more, I'll see what I can find out.

[Henrique 9,133]

I hope its Puma New Balance or Under Armor. Nike make the most boring kits available.

[the wes 7,212]

31 minutes ago, Despiadado.Maleante said:

Ffs something is really wrong with the his club.

It was the right move utd get £75m a year of adidas we were getting £30m a year that's not fair we deserve far more money 

[Captain Ahmed 528]

Lacoste or  Tommy Hilfiger

[MichaelDance 552]

1 hour ago, Tautvix said:

We must back to top as quickly as possible... Could be a vital few years for this football club.

 

So glad we are rid of them scumbags Adidas:

Quote

They signed the £30m-a-year deal in June 2013 and were surprised when the company secured a £75m-a-year deal with Manchester United 12 months later. They believe they have been one of the world's most successful clubs and the current adidas deal did not reflect their market value.
- http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11668/10278052/chelsea-and-adidas-agree-to-end-partnership-six-years-early-in-2017

If they paid £75m a year with United why did they offer us £30M when we won the BPL?

[MichaelDance 552]

6 minutes ago, the wes said:

It was the right move utd get £75m a year of adidas we were getting £30m a year that's not fair we deserve far more money 

Hear hear we won the BPL and get less than a club who didn't make it to the top 3.

[DavidEU 2,023]

19 minutes ago, MichaelDance said:

Hear hear we won the BPL and get less than a club who didn't make it to the top 3.

United have a far bigger fan base than us, it's not an insult, it's just a fact. Isn't really anything to do with trophies is it, it's business. 

Id be very surprised if we got anywhere near Uniteds £75m a season. 

[MichaelDance 552]

2 minutes ago, DavidEU said:

United have a far bigger fan base than us, it's not an insult, it's just a fact. Isn't really anything to do with trophies is it, it's business. 

Id be very surprised if we got anywhere near Uniteds £75m a season. 

Well it is and it isn't I agree with you. But if United don't get Champions League football twice in a row they loose 30%.

Quote

United receive £75m a year from adidas but that is cut by 30 per cent to £52m if they fail to qualify for the Champions League two seasons in a row

Still more than we got / get.

[the wes 7,212]

Well I think it's a smart move from the board we should get £50m a year for a kit deal 

[BlueLyon 9,359]

Fuck they will ruin every damn thing that is good about chelsea. I get its just a kit and we will get more money, but we will probably end up with new balance or under armour or some shit that will make us look like clownish 3rd tier club. 

First yokohama then this. What is this bullshit. And we dont even spend the damn fucking money we get on players that would get us back to the top. 

I hope we get nike now. Anything else would be disaster. UA is making spurs kits like shit, nb is even worse. Puma is puma. Nike is only one that remains and while their kits are similar, at least they make them simple and classy and have good reputation in football world. 

All happy with hazard goal vs liverpool than I hear this shit. Season cant get any worse ffs.

[the wes 7,212]

27 minutes ago, BlueLyon said:

Fuck they will ruin every damn thing that is good about chelsea. I get its just a kit and we will get more money, but we will probably end up with new balance or under armour or some shit that will make us look like clownish 3rd tier club. 

First yokohama then this. What is this bullshit. And we dont even spend the damn fucking money we get on players that would get us back to the top. 

I hope we get nike now. Anything else would be disaster. UA is making spurs kits like shit, nb is even worse. Puma is puma. Nike is only one that remains and while their kits are similar, at least they make them simple and classy and have good reputation in football world. 

All happy with hazard goal vs liverpool than I hear this shit. Season cant get any worse ffs.

The daily mail are reporting that the next kit deal is Nike 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3585244/Chelsea-s-2016-17-kit-deal-adidas-mutually-agreeing-end-partnership-prematurely.html

[BlueLyon 9,359]

3 minutes ago, the wes said:

The daily mail are reporting that the next kit deal is Nike 

Thats good. I would love Umbro as well, but they probably cant afford that much money.

Im very nostalgic, getting back to Umbro would be amazing too. But if the Nike is true, I wont complain realy. As long its not one of those like UA or NB.

[the wes 7,212]

2 minutes ago, BlueLyon said:

Thats good. I would love Umbro as well, but they probably cant afford that much money.

Im very nostalgic, getting back to Umbro would be amazing too. But if the Nike is true, I wont complain realy. As long its not one of those like UA or NB.

Sportsmail understands that the west London outfit have lined up Nike as their new kit partner and will buyout adidas' current contract worth up to £30milion-per-annum - six years early.